Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313574acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PrivIdEx: Privacy Preserving and Secure Exchange of Digital Identity Assets.

Published: 13 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

User's digital identity information has privacy and security requirements. Privacy requirements include confidentiality of the identity information itself, anonymity of those who verify and consume a user's identity information and unlinkability of online transactions which involve a user's identity. Security requirements include correctness, ownership assurance and prevention of counterfeits of a user's identity information. Such privacy and security requirements, although conflicting, are critical for identity management systems enabling the exchange of users' identity information between different parties during the execution of online transactions. Addressing all such requirements, without a centralized party managing the identity exchange transactions, raises several challenges. This paper presents a decentralized protocol for privacy preserving exchange of users' identity information addressing such challenges. The proposed protocol leverages advances in blockchain and zero knowledge proof technologies, as the main building blocks. We provide prototype implementations of the main building blocks of the protocol and assess its performance and security.

References

[1]
E. Androulaki, S. Cocco, and C. Ferris. 2018. Private and confidential transactions with Hyperledger Fabric. https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/cl-blockchain-private-confidential-transactions-hyperledger-fabric-zero-knowledge-proof/Accessed: 1-Nov-2018.
[2]
M. Andrychowicz, S. Dziembowski, and D. Malinowski. 2014. Secure Multiparty Computations on Bitcoin. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
[3]
E. Ben-Sasson, I. Bentov, Y. Horesh, and M. Riabzev. 2018. Scalable, transparent, and post-quantum secure computational integrity. In Cryptology ePrint Archive: Listing for 2018.
[4]
E. Ben-Sasson, A. Chiesa, C. Garman, M. Green, I. Miers, E. Tromer, and M. Virza. 2014. Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
[5]
David Birch. 2016. Putting identity on the blockchain.http://www.chyp.com/putting-identity-on-the-blockchain-part-1-find-a-problem/.
[6]
D. Boneh. 1998. Twenty Years of Attacks on the RSA Cryptosystem. https://crypto.stanford.edu/%7Edabo/pubs/papers/RSA-survey.pdfAccessed: 22-Sept-2018.
[7]
Luis T.A.N. Brandao, N. Christin, G. Danezis, and Anonymous.2015. Toward Mending Two Nation-Scale Brokered Identification Systems. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies.
[8]
B. Bunz, J. Bootle, D. Boneh, A. Poelstra, P. Wuille, and G. Maxwell. 2018. Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
[9]
J. Camenisch and A. Lysyanskaya. 2001. An Efficient System for Non-Transferable Anonymous Credentials with Optional Anonymity Revocation. In Proceedings of EUROCRYPT '01. 93-118.
[10]
R. Beaulieu et. al. 2013. The Simon and Speck Families of Lightweight Block Ciphers. https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/404.pdfAccessed: 22-Sept-2018.
[11]
Open Identity Exchange. {n. d.}. OIX - Open Identity Exchange. https://www.openidentityexchange.org/Accessed: 22-Nov-2017.
[12]
Hyperledger Fabric. 2018. A Blockchain Platform for the Enterprise. https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.3/Accessed: 16-Oct-2018.
[13]
R. Gennaro, S. Jarecki, H. Krawczyk, and T. Rabin. 2007. Secure Distributed Key Generation Protocol. In J Cryptology.
[14]
R. Gennaro, C. Gentry B. Parno, and M. Raykova. 2013. Quadratic Span Programs and Succinct NIZKs without PCPs. In EUROCRYPT.
[15]
GOV.UK. 2018. Introducing GOV.UK Verify. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify/introducing-govuk-verifyAccessed: 22-Sept-2018.
[16]
H. Gunasinghe, A. Kundu, E. Bertino, H. Krawczyk, K. Singh, S. Chari, and D. Su. 2019. PrivIdEx: Privacy Preserving and Secure Exchange of Digital Identity Assets. https://www.cerias.purdue.edu/assets/pdf/bibtex_archive/2019-01.pdfAccessed: 15-Feb-2019.
[17]
Ahmed Kosba. 2017. jsnark. https://github.com/akosba/jsnarkAccessed: 22-Nov-2017.
[18]
A. Kosba, A. Miller, and E. Shi. 2014. Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
[19]
S. Nakamoto. 2008. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
[20]
Nat. 2010. Is Expressing Levels Enough for LOA2+?https://nat.sakimura.org/2010/09/03/is-expressing-levels-enough-for-loa2/Accessed: 22-Sept-2018.
[21]
United States Postal Office. 2014. FCCX Briefing. https://csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/events/ispab-june-2014-meeting/documents/ispab_jun2014_fccx-briefing_glair.pdfAccessed: 22-Sept-2018.
[22]
OpenID. 2017. Welcome to OpenID Connect. http://openid.net/connect/Accessed: 22-Nov-2017.
[23]
scipr lab. 2017. C++ library for zkSNARKs. https://github.com/scipr-lab/libsnarkAccessed: 22-Nov-2017.
[24]
Prabath Siriwardena. 2017. A Deeper Look Into Bitcoin Internals. https://medium.facilelogin.com/pay-with-bitcoin-to-play-with-a-fidget-spinner-86b7b43414c0Accessed: 22-Sept-2018.
[25]
Prabath Siriwardena. 2017. Identity on Blockchain (Part I). https://medium.facilelogin.com/identity-on-blockchain-part-i-a59d7abe75c0Accessed: 22-Sept-2018.
[26]
sovrin. 2017. Identity For All. https://sovrin.org/Accessed: 22-Nov-2017.
[27]
European Union. 2016. General Data Protection Regulation. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679Accessed: 22-Sept-2018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Blockchain-driven decentralized identity managementInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2024.10402661:7Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Systematic review: Comparing zk‐SNARK, zk‐STARK, and bulletproof protocols for privacy‐preserving authenticationSECURITY AND PRIVACY10.1002/spy2.401Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Survey on Digital Sovereignty and Identity: From Digitization to DigitalizationACM Computing Surveys10.1145/361640056:3(1-36)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
May 2019
3620 pages
ISBN:9781450366748
DOI:10.1145/3308558
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Blockchain
  2. Counterfeit elimination
  3. Decentralized identity asset exchange
  4. Privacy preserving
  5. Unlinkability
  6. ZK-SNARK

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '19
WWW '19: The Web Conference
May 13 - 17, 2019
CA, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)57
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Blockchain-driven decentralized identity managementInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2024.10402661:7Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Systematic review: Comparing zk‐SNARK, zk‐STARK, and bulletproof protocols for privacy‐preserving authenticationSECURITY AND PRIVACY10.1002/spy2.401Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Survey on Digital Sovereignty and Identity: From Digitization to DigitalizationACM Computing Surveys10.1145/361640056:3(1-36)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Safety Warning! Decentralised and Automated Incentives for Disqualified Drivers Auditing in Ride-Hailing ServicesIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.310801222:3(1748-1762)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
  • (2023)A Systematic Literature Mapping on Using Blockchain Technology in Identity ManagementIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325651911(26004-26032)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Fair Data Marketing in HCNBlockchain-Based Data Security in Heterogeneous Communications Networks10.1007/978-3-031-52477-6_5(137-183)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Blockchain-Cloud Transparent Data Marketing: Consortium Management and FairnessIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2022.3150724(1-1)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Blockchain for Transparent Data Management Toward 6GEngineering10.1016/j.eng.2021.10.0028(74-85)Online publication date: Jan-2022
  • (2022)zkChain: A privacy‐preserving model based on zk‐SNARKs and hash chain for efficient transfer of assetsTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies10.1002/ett.470935:4Online publication date: 18-Dec-2022
  • (2020)Privacy-preserving AI Services Through Data DecentralizationProceedings of The Web Conference 202010.1145/3366423.3380106(190-200)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media