Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3306446.3340819acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesopencollabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Open data policy development: how can municipalities take account of residents' perspectives?

Published: 20 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

In many countries, governments encourage municipalities to develop open data policies and subsequently open up data. Municipal open data policies are often supply-driven and not based on residents' wishes. Municipalities lack insight into residents' perspectives on opening up municipal data and often do not know how to take them into account when developing their open data policies. This paper aims to reveal residents' perspectives on municipal open data policies and provide recommendations for municipalities on how to account for them when developing future open data policies. Using Q-methodology and applying it to the municipality of Delft in the Netherlands, we elicited the perspective of four main groups of residents on the development of the municipal open data policy as follows: 1) 'the oblivious residents', 2) 'the distrustful residents', 3) 'the trusting, passive residents', and 4) 'the open data advocates'. We found that all residents considered transparency important for the quality of public administration, and that municipal transparency is currently lacking. We then provide recommendations for policy makers responsible for municipal open data policies and suggest directions for open data theory development concerning municipal open data policy.

References

[1]
M. Akkermans. Sociaaleconomische trends. ICT-vaardigheden van Nederland. 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2017 from: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/_pdf/2016/30/2016st06-ict-vaardigheden-van-nederlanders.pdf
[2]
S. Alawadhi, A. Aldama-Nalda, H. Chourabi, J. R. Gil-Garcia, S. Leung, S. Mellouli, et al., "Building understanding of smart city initiatives," in International Conference on Electronic Government, Kristiansand, Norway, 2012, pp. 40--53.
[3]
Algemene Rekenkamer. Trendrapport open data 2014. 2014. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from: https://www.rekenkamer.nl/publicaties/rapporten/2014/03/27/trendrapport-open-data
[4]
Algemene Rekenkamer. Trendrapport open data 2015. 2015. Retrieved November 23, 2017 from: https://www.rekenkamer.nl/publicaties/rapporten/2015/03/31/trendrapport-open-data-2015
[5]
A. Ali- Eldin, A. Zuiderwijk, and M. Janssen, "Opening more data. A new privacy risk scoring model for open data " presented at the 7th International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design, Barcelona, Spain, 2017.
[6]
J. Bates. 2012. "This is what modern deregulation looks like" : co-optation and contestation in the shaping of the UK's Open Government Data Initiative. Journal of Community Informatics 8, 2:
[7]
A. Benlian, D. Hilkert, and T. Hess. 2015. How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors' perspective. Journal of Information Technology 30, 3: pp. 209--228.
[8]
L. B. Bingham, T. Nabatchi, and R. O'Leary. 2005. The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public administration review of Policy Research 65, 5: pp. 547--558.
[9]
S. R. Brown. 1993. A primer on Q methodology. Operant subjectivity 16, 3/4: pp. 91--138.
[10]
J. Bruijn, E. Heuvelhof, R. Veld, and C. Prins, Procesmanagement: over procesmanagement en besluitvorming. Amsterdam: Boom Uitgevers Amsterdam, 2002.
[11]
Capgemini. Trends in veiligheid 2015. Digitale dienstverlening in het veiligheidsdomein. 2015. Retrieved November 23, 2017 from: https://www.trendsinveiligheid.nl/publicaties2015
[12]
Y. Charalabidis, A. Zuiderwijk, C. Alexopoulos, M. Janssen, T. Lampoltshammer, and E. Ferro, The World of Open Data: Concepts, Methods, Tools and Experiences: Springer, 2018.
[13]
A. T. Chatfield and C. G. Reddick. 2017. A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments. Government Information Quarterly 34, 2: pp. 231--243.
[14]
City of Chicago. Open Data Executive Order (No. 2012-2). 2012. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from: https://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/narr/foia/open_data_executiveorder.html
[15]
City of New York. Open data policy and technical standards manual. 2016. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from: https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doitt/downloads/pdf/nyc_open_data_tsm.pdf
[16]
P. Conradie and S. Choenni. 2014. On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly 31, supplement 1: pp. S10--S17.
[17]
S. Dawes and N. Helbig, "Information strategies for open government: challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency," presented at the 9th International Conference on e-Government, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010.
[18]
Delft. Open Delft. Een toekomstvaste strategie voor Delft in transitie naar maximale openheid. 2016. Retrieved November 2, 2017 from: http://ris.delft.nl/document.php?m=1&fileid=295228&f=5ea3d4b26ab0a923489f30d8e356e336&attachment=0&c=61762
[19]
European Commission. Digital agenda: Commission's open data strategy, questions & answers. 2011. Retrieved October 27, 2014 from: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/11/891&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
[20]
European Commission. Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the Re-use of Public Sector Information 2013. Retrieved April 7, 2015 from: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:175:0001:0008:EN:PDF
[21]
European Commission. EU implementation of the G8 Open Data Charter. 2013. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from: http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=3489
[22]
J. Fox. 2007. The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in practice 17, 4--5: pp. 663--671.
[23]
C. P. Geiger and J. von Lucke. 2012. Open government and (linked) (open) (government) (data). Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government 4, 2: pp. 265--278.
[24]
Gemeente Amsterdam City Data. Beschikbaarheid en kwaliteit data. 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2017 from: https://data.amsterdam.nl/#?mpb=topografie&mpz=11&mpv=52.3731081:4.8932945&pgn=content-detail&pgi=item1&pgt=beleid
[25]
Gemeente Amsterdam City Data. Privacy en informatiebeveiliging. 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2017 from: https://data.amsterdam.nl/#?mpb=topografie&mpz=11&mpv=52.3731081:4.8932945&pgn=content-detail&pgi=item0&pgt=beleid
[26]
Gemeente Amsterdam City Data. Technisch beheer en werkwijze. 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2017 from: https://data.amsterdam.nl/#?mpb=topografie&mpz=11&mpv=52.3731081:4.8932945&pgn=content-detail&pgi=item2&pgt=beleid
[27]
M. Gill, "Filtering down: Open data in smaller scaled Canadian municipalities," MA, Community, Culture, and Global Studies, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, Canada, 2016.
[28]
M. Gill and J. Corbett. 2017. Downscaling: Understanding the influence of open data initiatives in smaller and mid-sized cities in British Columbia, Canada. The Canadian Geographer 61, 2: pp. 346--359.
[29]
S. G. Grimmelikhuijsen, Transparency and trust: an experimental study of online disclosure and trust in Government. Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2012.
[30]
J. Gurin, Open data now. The secret to hot startups, Smart investing, savvy marketing, and fast innovation. New York: Mc Graw Hill Education, 2014.
[31]
M. Gurstein. 2011. Open data: empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday 16, 2: p. n.p.
[32]
S. Hartholt. Open data nog amper gebruikt door overheid. 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from: http://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/digitaal/nieuws/open-data-nog-amper-gebruikt-door-overheid.9470852.lynkx
[33]
A. Heise and F. Naumann. 2012. Integrating open government data with stratosphere for more transparency. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 14, pp. 45--56.
[34]
HM Government. Making Open Data Real: A Public Consultation. 2011. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78884/Open-Data-Consultation.pdf
[35]
U. Holtgrewe. 2014. New new technologies: the future and the present of work in information and communication technology. New technology, work and employment 29, 1: pp. 9--24.
[36]
N. Huijboom and T. van den Broek. 2011. Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice 12, 1: pp. 4--16.
[37]
P. T. Jaeger and J. C. Bertot. 2010. Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly 27, 4: pp. 371--376.
[38]
M. Janssen and J. van den Hoven. 2015. Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly 32, 4: pp. 363--368.
[39]
T. Jetzek, M. Avital, and N. Bjorn-Andersen, "The generative mechanisms of open government data," presented at the 21st European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2013.
[40]
T. Jetzek, M. Avital, and N. Bjørn-Andersen, "Generating Sustainable Value from Open Data in a Sharing Society," in Creating Value for All Through IT, ed: Springer, 2014, pp. 62--82.
[41]
M. Kassen. 2013. A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the Chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly 30, 4: pp. 508--513.
[42]
G. Lee and Y. H. Kwak. 2012. An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29, 4: pp. 492--503.
[43]
Maatschappelijke Coalitie voor een Open Overheid. Manifest 'Onze Overheid, Onze Informatie!'. 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from: http://open-overheid.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/onze-overheid-onze-informatie.pdf
[44]
S. Martin, M. Foulonneau, S. Turki, and M. Ihadjadene. 2013. Risk Analysis to Overcome Barriers to Open Data. Electronic Journal of e-Government 11, 1: pp. 348--359.
[45]
A. Meijer and M. P. R. Bolívar. 2016. Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences 82, 2: pp. 392--408.
[46]
R. Meijer, P. Conradie, and S. Choenni. 2014. Reconciling contradictions of open data regarding transparency, privacy, security and trust. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9, 2: pp. I--XIII.
[47]
Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. Open overheid in actie. Actieplan 2016--2017. 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from: http://open-overheid.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/actieplan-open-overheid-2016-2017-2.pdf
[48]
Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. Quick scan impact Wet open overheid (Woo). 2016. Retrieved November 23, 2017 from: https://kennisopenbaarbestuur.nl/media/254331/quick-scan-impact-wet-open-overheid.pdf
[49]
New York City. New York City launches "Open Data for All" initiative. 2015. Retrieved November 2, 2017 from: http://statescoop.com/new-york-city-launches-open-data-initiative/
[50]
E. Nordell, "Open Government and Open Data: A qualitative study of three Swedish municipalities," Master thesis, Archives and Information Science, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, 2015.
[51]
K. O'Hara, "Transparency, Open Data and Trust in Government: Shaping the Infosphere," presented at the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, Evanston, U.S.A., 2012.
[52]
B. Obama. Digital Government. Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People. 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2017 from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/egov/digital-government/digital-government-strategy.pdf
[53]
B. Obama. Memorandum for the Heads of executive Departments and Agencies: Transparency and Open Government. 2009. Retrieved December 14, 2017 from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2009/m09-12.pdf
[54]
K. Okamoto. 2016. What is being done with open government data? An exploratory analysis of public uses of New York City open data. Webology 13, 1: pp. 1--12.
[55]
A. Olalere and J. Lazar. 2011. Accessibility of US federal government home pages: Section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements. Government Information Quarterly 28, 3: pp. 303--309.
[56]
Open Knowledge Foundation. Open Definition version 2.0. 2015. Retrieved February 17, 2015 from: http://opendefinition.org/od/
[57]
Open State Foundation. Open data voor infrastructuur en milieu. 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from: https://openstate.eu/nl/2016/11/open-data-voor-infrastructuur-en-milieu/
[58]
A. Peled. 2011. When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA open data program. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 11: pp. 2085--2094.
[59]
A. Purwanto, M. Janssen, and A. Zuiderwijk, "Towards an Open Government Data Success Model: A case study from Indonesia," presented at the 17th European Conference on Digital Government, Lisbon, Portugal, 2017.
[60]
M. Romer, A. Zuiderwijk, and M. Kroesen, "Perspectives of residents on the open data policy of the municipality of Delft, the Netherlands," ed. https://data.4tu.nl/repository/, 2017.
[61]
R. Sandoval-Almazán. 2013. Open Government Success Factors in Government Websites: The Mexican Experience. E-Government Success Factors and Measures: Theories, Concepts, and Methodologies pp. 235--251.
[62]
T. Schillemans, M. van Twist, and I. Vanhommerig. 2013. Innovations in accountability Learning through Interactive, Dynamic, and Citizen-Initiated Forms of Accountability. Public Performance & Management Review 3, pp. 407--435.
[63]
P. Schmolk. PQ methode manual. 2015. Retrieved July 28, 2017 from: http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/pqmanual.htm
[64]
Share-PSI 2.0. Deliverable 7.2 Stable Version of the Share-PSI 2.0 Best Practices. Share-PSI 2.0 Standards for Open Data and Public Sector Information. 2016. Retrieved October 20, 2017 from: http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/bp/Share-PSI_D72
[65]
W. Stephenson. 1935. Correlating persons instead of tests. Journal of Personality 4, 1: pp. 17--24.
[66]
J. Stewart, Jr., D. M. Hedge, and J. P. Lester, Public policy: An evolutionary approach. Australia: Thomson Wadsworth, 2008.
[67]
I. Susha, "Participation in open government," Örebro university, 2015.
[68]
J. Tauberer. Open government data. 2012. Retrieved February 28, 2014 from: http://opengovdata.io/
[69]
J. Thorsby, G. Stowers, K. Wolslegel, and E. Tumbuan. 2017. Understanding the content and features of open data portals in American cities. Government Information Quarterly 34, 1: pp. 53--61.
[70]
B. Ubaldi, "Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives," OECD, Paris 2013.
[71]
E. Van Steenbergen. Privacy Amsterdamse burgers niet beschermd 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2017 from: https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/03/24/privacy-amsterdamse-burgers-niet-beschermd-a1408403
[72]
C. Veeckman and S. van der Graaf. 2015. The city as Living Laboratory: Empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review 5, 3: pp. 6--17.
[73]
Vereniging Nederlandse Gemeenten. Privacy. 2017. Retrieved May 3, 2017, 2017 from: https://vng.nl/onderwerpenindex/dienstverlening-en-informatiebeleid/informatieveiligheid-privacy/privacy
[74]
A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen. 2014. Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A comparison framework. Government Information Quarterly 31, 1: pp. 17--29.
[75]
A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2015. Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly 32, 4: pp. 429--440.
[76]
A. Zuiderwijk, C. Volten, M. Kroesen, and M. Gill. 2018. Motivation Perspectives on Opening up Municipality Data: Does Municipality Size Matter? Information 9, 11: p. 267.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Open Government Data from the Perspective of SMEs: A Case Study in IndonesiaJournal of Computing and Social Informatics10.33736/jcsi.4070.20221:1(1-13)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Information Technology Macro Trends Impacts on Cities: Guidelines for Urban PlannersHandbook of Smart Cities10.1007/978-3-030-69698-6_58(1493-1515)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Information Technology Macro Trends Impacts on Cities: Guidelines for Urban PlannersHandbook of Smart Cities10.1007/978-3-030-15145-4_58-1(1-24)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
OpenSym '19: Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Open Collaboration
August 2019
197 pages
ISBN:9781450363198
DOI:10.1145/3306446
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 August 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. OGD
  2. Q-methodology
  3. municipalities
  4. open data
  5. open government data
  6. perspective
  7. policy
  8. profile
  9. view

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

OpenSym '19

Acceptance Rates

OpenSym '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 23 submissions, 74%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 195 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Open Government Data from the Perspective of SMEs: A Case Study in IndonesiaJournal of Computing and Social Informatics10.33736/jcsi.4070.20221:1(1-13)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Information Technology Macro Trends Impacts on Cities: Guidelines for Urban PlannersHandbook of Smart Cities10.1007/978-3-030-69698-6_58(1493-1515)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2021
  • (2020)Information Technology Macro Trends Impacts on Cities: Guidelines for Urban PlannersHandbook of Smart Cities10.1007/978-3-030-15145-4_58-1(1-24)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media