Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3303772.3303805acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Motivated Information Seeking and Graph Comprehension Among College Students

Published: 04 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Learning Analytics Dashboards (LADs) are predicated on the notion that access to more academic information can help students regulate their academic behaviors, but what is the association between information seeking preferences and help-seeking practices among college students? If given access to more information, what might college students do with it?
We investigated these questions in a series of two studies. Study 1 validates a measure of information-seeking preferences---the Motivated Information-Seeking Questionnaire (MISQ)----using a college student sample drawn from across the country (n = 551). In a second study, we used the MISQ to measure college students' (n=210) performance-avoid (i.e., avoiding seeming incompetent in relation to one's peers) and performance-approach (i.e., wishing to outperform one's peers) information seeking preferences, their help-seeking behaviors, and their ability to comprehend line graphs and bar graphs---two common graphs types for LADs.
Results point to a negative relationship between graph comprehension and help-seeking strategies, such as attending office hours, emailing one's professor for help, or visiting a study center---even after controlling for academic performance and demographic characteristics. This suggests that students more capable of readings graphs might not seek help when needed. Further results suggest a positive relationship between performance-approach information-seeking preferences, and how often students compare themselves to their peers.
This study contributes to our understanding of the motivational implications of academic data visualizations in academic settings, and increases our knowledge of the way students interpret visualizations. It uncovers tensions between what students want to see, versus what it might be more motivationally appropriate for them to see. Importantly, the MISQ and graph comprehension measure can be used in future studies to better understand the role of students' information seeking tendencies with regard to their interpretation of various kinds of feedback present in LADs.

References

[1]
Stephen J Aguilar, Steven Lonn, and Stephanie D Teasley. 2014. Perceptions and use of an early warning system during a higher education transition program. In LAK '14 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. New York, New York, USA, 113--117.
[2]
Kimberly E Arnold, Grace Lynch, Daniel Huston, Lorna Wong, Linda Jorn, and Christopher W Olsen. 2014. Building institutional capacities and competencies for systemic learning analytics initiatives. In LAK '14 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 257--260.
[3]
K E Arnold and M D Pistilli. 2012. Course Signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In LAK '12: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
[4]
Sanam Shirazi Beheshitha, Marek Hatala, Dragan Gaševic, and Srecko Joksimovic. 2016. The role of achievement goal orientations when studying effect of learning analytics visualizations. In the Sixth International Conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 54--63.
[5]
Robert Bodily and Katrien Verbert. 2017. Trends and issues in student-facing learning analytics reporting systems research. In the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 309--318.
[6]
John P Campbell, Peter B DeBlois, Oblinger, and Diana G. 2007. Academic Analytics: A New Tool for a New Era. Educause Review 42, 4 (July 2007), 1--10.
[7]
Shevawn B Eaton and John P Bean. 1995. An Approach/Avoidance Behavioral Model of College Student Attrition. Research in Higher Education 36, 6 (1995), 617--645.
[8]
Asmaa Elbadrawy, R Scott Studham, and George Karypis. 2015. Collaborative multi-regression models for predicting students' performance in course activities. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 103--107.
[9]
Andrew J Elliot. 2005. A Conceptual History of the Achievment Goal Construct. Handbook of Competence and Motivation (2005), 52--72.
[10]
Andrew J Elliot and Holly A McGregor. 2001. A 2 X 2 Achievment Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (2001), 501--519.
[11]
Elaine S Elliott and C S Dweck. 1988. Goals: An Approachto Motivationand Achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1 (1988), 5--12.
[12]
D Harrington. 2008. Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Scott Harrison, Renato Villano, Grace Lynch, and George Chen. 2015. Likelihood analysis of student enrollment outcomes using learning environment variables. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 141--145.
[14]
R K Henson and J Kyle Roberts. 2006. Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement 66, 3 (June 2006), 393--416.
[15]
Stuart A Karabenick. 2004. Perceived Achievement Goal Structure and College Student Help Seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology 96, 3 (2004), 569--581.
[16]
Stuart A Karabenick, Michael E Wooley, Jeanne M Friedel, Bridget V Ammon, Julianne Blazevski, Christina Rhee Bonney, Elizabeth De Groot, Melissa C Gilbert, Lauren Musu, Toni M Kempler, and Kristin L Kelly. 2007. Cognitive Processing of Self-Report Items in Educational Research: Do They Think What We Mean? Educational Psychologist 42, 3 (July 2007), 139--151.
[17]
Gregor Kennedy, Carleton Coffrin, Paula de Barba, and Linda Corrin. 2015. Predicting success. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 136--140.
[18]
Imran Khan and Abelardo Pardo. 2016. Data2U. In the Sixth International Conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 249--253.
[19]
Andrew E Krumm, R Joseph Waddington, Stephanie D Teasley, and Steven Lonn. 2014. A Learning Management System-Based Early Warning System for Academic Advising in Undergraduate Engineering. In Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, Johann Ari Larusson and Brandon White (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 103--119.
[20]
Fani Lauermann and Stuart A Karabenick. 2013. The meaning and measure of teachers' sense of responsibility for educational outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education 30 (Feb. 2013), 13--26.
[21]
S Lonn, Stephen J Aguilar, and S D Teasley. 2013. Issues, challenges, and lessons learned when scaling up a learning analytics intervention. In LAK '13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
[22]
Steven Lonn, Stephen J Aguilar, and Stephanie D Teasley. 2014. Investigating student motivation in the context of a learning analytics intervention during a summer bridge program. Computers in Human Behavior 47 (Aug. 2014), 1--8.
[23]
Robert C MacCallum, Michael W Browne, and Hazuki M Sugawara. 1996. Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods 2, 3 (1996), 130--149.
[24]
Carol Midgley, Ludmila Z Hruda, Eric M Anderman, Lynley Anderman, Kimberley E Freeman, Margaret Gheen, Avi Kaplan, Revathy Kumar, Michael J Middleton, Jeanne Nelson, Robert W Roeser, and Timothy Urdan. 2000. Manual for Patterns of Adaptive Learing Scales.
[25]
William L Miller, Ryan S Baker, Matthew J Labrum, Karen Petsche, Yu-Han Liu, and Angela Z Wagner. 2015. Automated detection of proactive remediation by teachers in reasoning mind classrooms. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 290--294.
[26]
Tamera B Murdock and Eric M Anderman. 2006. Motivational Perspectives on Student Cheating: Toward an Integrated Model of Academic Dishonesty. Educational Psychologist 41, 3 (Sept. 2006), 129--145.
[27]
SungJin Nam, Steven Lonn, Thomas Brown, Cinda-Sue Davis, and Darryl Koch. 2014. Customized course advising. In LAK '14 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 16--25.
[28]
Abelardo Pardo. 2014. Designing Learning Analytics Experiences. In Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, Johann Ari Larusson and Brandon White (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 15--38.
[29]
Abelardo Pardo, Feifei Han, and Robert A Ellis. 2016. Exploring the relation between self-regulation, online activities, and academic performance. In the Sixth International Conference. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 422--429.
[30]
Tony Perez, Jennifer G Cromley, and Avi Kaplan. 2014. The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology 106, 1 (2014), 315--329.
[31]
P R Pintrich. 2004. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. (2004).
[32]
G Siemens. 2013. Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 10 (Sept. 2013), 1380--1400.
[33]
B Thompson. 2004. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.
[34]
Alyssa Friend Wise, Yuting Zhao, and Simone Nicole Hausknecht. 2014. Learning Analytics for Online Discussions: Embedded and Extracted Approaches. Journal of Learning Analytics (Sept. 2014), 48--71.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Systematic Review of Studies on Decision-Making Systems for Teaching and Learning in K-12Technology Enhanced Learning for Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_4(49-63)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Using Motivation Theory to Design Equity-Focused Learning Analytics DashboardsTrends in Higher Education10.3390/higheredu20200152:2(283-290)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Experimental Evidence of Performance Feedback vs. Mastery Feedback on Students’ Academic MotivationLAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3506860.3506916(556-562)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Motivated Information Seeking and Graph Comprehension Among College Students

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    LAK19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge
    March 2019
    565 pages
    ISBN:9781450362566
    DOI:10.1145/3303772
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 March 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Higher Education
    2. Instrument Validation
    3. Motivation
    4. Non-cognitive factors
    5. Visualizations

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    LAK19

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Systematic Review of Studies on Decision-Making Systems for Teaching and Learning in K-12Technology Enhanced Learning for Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_4(49-63)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
    • (2023)Using Motivation Theory to Design Equity-Focused Learning Analytics DashboardsTrends in Higher Education10.3390/higheredu20200152:2(283-290)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Experimental Evidence of Performance Feedback vs. Mastery Feedback on Students’ Academic MotivationLAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3506860.3506916(556-562)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Past, present, and future directions of learning analytics research for students with disabilitiesJournal of Research on Technology in Education10.1080/15391523.2022.206779655:6(931-946)Online publication date: 9-May-2022
    • (2020)Using Information Visualization to Promote Students' Reflection on "Gaming the System" in Online LearningProceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3386527.3405924(37-49)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2020
    • (2020)Learning analytics dashboardsProceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge10.1145/3375462.3375504(35-40)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media