Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3301275.3302325acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

An intelligent assistant for mediation analysis in visual analytics

Published: 17 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Mediation analysis is commonly performed using regressions or Bayesian network analysis in statistics, psychology, and health science; however, it is not effectively supported in existing visualization tools. The lack of assistance poses great risks when people use visualizations to explore causal relationships and make data-driven decisions, as spurious correlations or seemingly conflicting visual patterns might occur. In this paper, we focused on the causal reasoning task over three variables and investigated how an interface could help users reason more efficiently. We developed an interface that facilitates two processes involved in causal reasoning: 1) detecting inconsistent trends, which guides users' attention to important visual evidence, and 2) interpreting visualizations, by providing assisting visual cues and allowing users to compare key visualizations side by side. Our preliminary study showed that the features are potentially beneficial. We discuss design implications and how the features could be generalized for more complex causal analysis.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p432-yen.mp4)

References

[1]
Zan Armstrong and Martin Wattenberg. 2014. Visualizing statistical mix effects and simpson's paradox. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 12 (2014), 2132--2141.
[2]
Reuben M Baron and David A Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology 51, 6 (1986), 1173.
[3]
Peter J Bickel, Eugene A Hammel, and J William O'Connell. 1975. Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley. Science 187, 4175 (1975), 398--404.
[4]
David Gotz, Shun Sun, and NanCao. 2016. Adaptive contextualization: Combating bias during high-dimensional visualization and data selection. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 85--95.
[5]
D Guber. 1999. Getting what you pay for: The debate over equity in public school expenditures. Journal of Statistics Education 7, 2 (1999).
[6]
Yue Guo, Carsten Binnig, and Tim Kraska. 2017. What you see is not what you get!: Detecting simpson's paradoxes during data exploration. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Human-In-the-Loop Data Analytics. ACM, 2.
[7]
Andrew F Hayes. 2009. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication monographs 76, 4 (2009), 408--420.
[8]
Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality. Cambridge university press.
[9]
Michael L Radelet and Glenn L Pierce. 1991. Choosing those who will die: Race and the death penalty in Florida. Fla. L. Rev. 43 (1991), 1.
[10]
Ken Ross. 2007. A mathematician at the ballpark: Odds and probabilities for baseball fans. Penguin.
[11]
Edward H Simpson. 1951. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) (1951), 238--241.
[12]
Peter Spirtes, Clark N Glymour, and Richard Scheines. 2000. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press.
[13]
Manasi Vartak, Sajjadur Rahman, Samuel Madden, Aditya Parameswaran, and Neoklis Polyzotis. 2015. ***See DB: efficient data-driven visualization recommendations to support visual analytics. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 8, 13 (2015), 2182--2193.
[14]
Emily Wall, Leslie M Blaha, Lyndsey Franklin, and Alex Endert. 2017. Warning, bias may occur: A proposed approach to detecting cognitive bias in interactive visual analytics. In IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).
[15]
Jun Wang and Klaus Mueller. 2016. The visual causality analyst: An interactive interface for causal reasoning. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 22, 1 (2016), 230--239.
[16]
Jun Wang and Klaus Mueller. 2017. Visual causality analysis made practical. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). IEEE.
[17]
Timothy D Wilson and Daniel T Gilbert. 2008. Explaining away: A model of affective adaptation. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, 5 (2008), 370--386.
[18]
Xinshu Zhao, John G Lynch Jr, and Qimei Chen. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research 37, 2 (2010), 197--206.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)CrowdIDEA: Blending Crowd Intelligence and Data Analytics to Empower Causal ReasoningProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581021(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

Index Terms

  1. An intelligent assistant for mediation analysis in visual analytics

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IUI '19: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
    March 2019
    713 pages
    ISBN:9781450362726
    DOI:10.1145/3301275
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 March 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. causal reasoning
    2. intelligent visualization tool
    3. mediation analysis

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    IUI '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    IUI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 71 of 282 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

    Upcoming Conference

    IUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)CrowdIDEA: Blending Crowd Intelligence and Data Analytics to Empower Causal ReasoningProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581021(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media