Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3386367.3431668acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Slicing 5G fronthaul networks using programmable switches

Published: 24 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Slicing is a critical technology in 5G, as it allows operators to slice a physical network into multiple virtual networks, each dedicated to a different use case/Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) [2]. Network slicing enables network operators to deploy a tailored set of resources for specific use cases or MVNO. For example, high performance reliable hardware is required only for ultra-reliable low-latency (uRLLC) use cases such as autonomous vehicle networks. Such tailoring of services reduces costs for network operators. Further, 5G systems can now be deployed more quickly due to virtualization provided by slicing, thereby enabling faster time-to-market. To this end, there exists a large body of work that introduces slicing in different parts of the cellular network (see Fig. 1). PRAN [12] and FlexRAN [13] provide slicing in the Radio Access Network (RAN) while Orion [14] provides slicing for the frontend (wireless spectrum). The fronthaul connects the frontend base station to the RAN and carries digitized radio signals between the two parts of the cellular network. However, to the best of our knowledge, there exists no work on slicing in the fronthaul. This severely limits the benefits of slicing in the RAN and the frontend (see §1.1).

References

[1]
3GPP TR 38.802. 2017. Study on New Radio Access Technology Physical Layer Aspects. (2017).
[2]
3GPP. 2016. TS 28.500: Management Concept, Architecture and Requirements for Mobile Network that include Virtualized Network Functions. (2016).
[3]
3GPP. 2017. TS 36.213 v14.2.0: E-UTRA Physical Layer Procedures. (2017).
[4]
CPRI Consortium et al. 2019. eCPRI Specification V2.0.
[5]
D. Eisenbud et al. 2016. Maglev: A fast and reliable software network load balancer. In NSDI.
[6]
G. Garcia-Aviles et al. 2018. POSENS: A practical open source solution for end-to-end network slicing. IEEE Wireless Communications (2018).
[7]
M. Kuźniar et al. 2015. What you need to know about SDN flow tables. In PAM.
[8]
N. Budhdev et al. 2020. Poster: IsoRAN: Isolation and Scaling for 5G RAN via User-Level Data Plane Virtualization. In IFIP Networking.
[9]
P. Kannan et al. 2019. Precise time-synchronization in the data-plane using programmable switching ASICs. In SOSR.
[10]
R. Miao et al. 2017. Silkroad: Making Stateful Layer-4 Load Balancing Fast and Cheap Using Switching ASICs. In SIGCOMM.
[11]
Umesh A. et al. 2019. Overview of O-RAN Fronthaul Specification. NTT Docomo Technical Journal (2019).
[12]
W. Wu et al. 2014. PRAN: Programmable Radio Access Networks. In HotNets.
[13]
X. Foukas et al. 2016. FlexRAN: A Flexible and Programmable Platform for Software- Defined Radio Access Networks. In CoNEXT.
[14]
X. Foukas et al. 2017. Orion: RAN slicing for a flexible and cost-effective multiservice mobile network architecture. In MOBICOM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Programmable Data Plane Applications in 5G and Beyond Architectures: A Systematic ReviewSensors10.3390/s2315695523:15(6955)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2023
  • (2022)ShapeShifter: Resolving the Hidden Latency Contention Problem in MEC2022 IEEE/ACM 7th Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC)10.1109/SEC54971.2022.00026(237-251)Online publication date: Dec-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CoNEXT '20: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies
November 2020
585 pages
ISBN:9781450379489
DOI:10.1145/3386367
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 5G cellular networks
  2. network scheduler
  3. programmable switches
  4. slicing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Singapore Ministry of Education

Conference

CoNEXT '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 198 of 789 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

CoNEXT '24

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Programmable Data Plane Applications in 5G and Beyond Architectures: A Systematic ReviewSensors10.3390/s2315695523:15(6955)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2023
  • (2022)ShapeShifter: Resolving the Hidden Latency Contention Problem in MEC2022 IEEE/ACM 7th Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC)10.1109/SEC54971.2022.00026(237-251)Online publication date: Dec-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media