research-article

Product line adoption in industry: an experience report from the railway domain

Authors:

Muhammad Abbas,

Robbert Jongeling,

Claes Lindskog,

Eduard Paul Enoiu,

Mehrdad Saadatmand,

Daniel SundmarkAuthors Info & Claims

SPLC '20: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Systems and Software Product Line: Volume A - Volume A

Article No.: 3, Pages 1 - 11

https://doi.org/10.1145/3382025.3414953

Published: 19 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The software system controlling a train is typically deployed on various hardware architectures and must process various signals across those deployments. The increase of such customization scenarios and the needed adherence of the software to various safety standards in different application domains has led to the adoption of product line engineering within the railway domain. This paper explores the current state-of-practice of software product line development within a team developing industrial embedded software for a train propulsion control system. Evidence is collected using a focus group session with several engineers and through inspection of archival data. We report several benefits and challenges experienced during product line adoption and deployment. Furthermore, we identify and discuss improvement opportunities, focusing mainly on product line evolution and test automation.

References

[1]

Muhammad Abbas. 2020. Variability Aware Requirements Reuse Analysis. In The 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE '20 Companion). ACM. http://www.es.mdh.se/publications/5734-

[2]

Jonatas Ferreira Bastos, Paulo Anselmo da Mota Silveira Neto, Eduardo Santana de Almeida, and Silvio Romero de Lemos Meira. 2011. Adopting software product lines: a systematic mapping study. In 15th Annual Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE 2011). IET, 11--20.

[3]

Jonatas Ferreira Bastos, Paulo Anselmo da Mota Silveira Neto, Pádraig O'Leary, Eduardo Santana de Almeida, and Silvio Romero de Lemos Meira. 2017. Software product lines adoption in small organizations. Journal of Systems and Software 131 (2017), 112--128.

Digital Library

[4]

Veronika Bauer. 2015. Challenges of structured reuse adoption---Lessons learned. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. Springer, 24--39.

Digital Library

[5]

Kent Beck, Mike Beedle, Arie Van Bennekum, Alistair Cockburn, Ward Cunningham, Martin Fowler, James Grenning, Jim Highsmith, Andrew Hunt, Ron Jeffries, et al. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://agilemanifesto.org

[6]

Damir Bilic, Daniel Sundmark, Wasif Afzal, Peter Wallin, Adnan Causevic, and Christoffer Amlinger. 2018. Model-Based Product Line Engineering in an Industrial Automotive Context: An Exploratory Case Study. In International Systems and Software Product Line Conference. ACM, 56--63.

Digital Library

[7]

Damir Bilic, Daniel Sundmark, Wasif Afzal, Peter Wallin, Adnan Causevic, Christoffer Amlinger, and Dani Barkah. 2020. Towards a Model-Driven Product Line Engineering Process: An Industrial Case Study. In Proceedings of the 13th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference on Formerly known as India Software Engineering Conference. 1--11.

Digital Library

[8]

Günter Böckle, Jesús Bermejo Muñoz, Peter Knauber, Charles W Krueger, Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite, Frank van der Linden, Linda Northrop, Michael Stark, and David M Weiss. 2002. Adopting and institutionalizing a product line culture. In International Conference on Software Product Lines. Springer, 49--59.

[9]

Glenn A Bowen et al. 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal 9, 2 (2009), 27.

[10]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.

[11]

Rosanna L Breen. 2006. A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 30, 3 (2006), 463--475.

[12]

Cagatay Catal. 2009. Barriers to the adoption of software product line engineering. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 34, 6 (2009), 1--4.

Digital Library

[13]

Krzysztof Czarnecki and Michał Antkiewicz. 2005. Mapping Features to Models: A Template Approach Based on Superimposed Variants. In Generative Programming and Component Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 422--437.

[14]

Frank Dordowsky and Walter Hipp. 2009. Adopting Software Product Line Principles to Manage Software Variants in a Complex Avionics System. In Proceedings of the 13th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC '09). Carnegie Mellon University, USA, 265--274.

Digital Library

[15]

M. A. Jabar, M. B. Zarei, F. Sidi, and N. F.M. Sani. 2013. A review of software product line adoption. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 57, 1 (2013), 88--94.

[16]

Meena Jha and Liam O'Brien. 2009. Identifying Issues and Concerns in Software Reuse in Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Reuse: Formal Foundations of Reuse and Domain Engineering (ICSR '09). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 181--190.

Digital Library

[17]

P. Knauber, D. Muthig, K. Schmid, and T. Widen. 2000. Applying Product Line Concepts in Small and Medium-Sized Companies. IEEE Software 17, 5 (2000), 88--95.

Digital Library

[18]

Jyrki Kontio, Johanna Bragge, and Laura Lehtola. 2008. The focus group method as an empirical tool in software engineering. In Guide to advanced empirical software engineering. Springer, 93--116.

[19]

Jyrki Kontio, Laura Lehtola, and Johanna Bragge. 2004. Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. In Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE'04. IEEE, 271--280.

[20]

Pasi Kuvaja, Jouni Similä, and Hanna Hanhela. 2008. Software product line adoption-guidelines from a case study. In IFIP Central and East European Conference on Software Engineering Techniques. Springer, 143--157.

[21]

Yan Li, Tao Yue, Shaukat Ali, and Li Zhang. 2019. Enabling automated requirements reuse and configuration. Software and Systems Modeling 18, 3 (2019), 2177--2211.

Digital Library

[22]

N. Matsuda. 2004. Problems and suggestions for adopting product line software engineering from modification style development. In 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference. 568--571.

Digital Library

[23]

Parastoo Mohagheghi and Reidar Conradi. 2003. Different aspects of product family adoption. In International Workshop on Software Product-Family Engineering. Springer, 429--434.

[24]

Jefferson Seide Molléri, Michael Felderer, Emilia Mendes, and Kai Petersen. 2019. Reasoning about Research Quality Alignment in Software Engineering. Journal of Systems and Software (2019).

[25]

Najam Nazar and TMJ Rakotomahefa. 2016. Analysis of a Small Company for Software Product Line Adoption-An Industrial Case Study. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering 8, 4 (2016), 313.

[26]

Mercy Njima and Serge Demeyer. 2019. An Exploratory Study on Migrating Single-Products towards Product Lines in Startup Contexts. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive Systems (VAMOS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Article 10, 6 pages.

Digital Library

[27]

Klaus Pohl, Günter Böckle, and Frank J van Der Linden. 2005. Software product line engineering: foundations, principles and techniques. Springer Science & Business Media.

[28]

Per Runeson and Martin Höst. 2009. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 14, 2 (2009), 131--164.

Digital Library

[29]

Holger Schlingloff, Peter M. Kruse, and Mehrdad Saadatmand. 2020. Excellence in Variant Testing. In Proceedings of the 14th International Working Conference on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive Systems (VAMOS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 2 pages.

Digital Library

[30]

K. Schmid and M. Verlage. 2002. The economic impact of product line adoption and evolution. IEEE Software 19, 4 (2002), 50--57.

Digital Library

[31]

D. Sellier, M. Mannion, G. Benguria, and G. Urchegui. 2007. Introducing Software Product Line Engineering for Metal Processing Lines in a Small to Medium Enterprise. In 11th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2007). 54--62.

[32]

Karma Sherif and Ajay Vinze. 2003. Barriers to adoption of software reuse: A qualitative study. Information & Management 41, 2 (2003), 159--175.

Digital Library

[33]

Williamson Silva, Igor Steinmacher, and Tayana Conte. 2019. Students' and instructors' perceptions of five different active learning strategies used to teach software modeling. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 184063--184077.

[34]

M. Staples and D. Hill. 2004. Experiences adopting software product line development without a product line architecture. In 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference. 176--183.

[35]

Stefan Strobl, Mario Bernhart, and Thomas Grechenig. 2010. An Experience Report on the Incremental Adoption and Evolution of an SPL in EHealth. In Proceedings of the 2010 ICSE Workshop on Product Line Approaches in Software Engineering (PLEASE '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 16--23.

Digital Library

[36]

M. Verlage and T. Kiesgen. 2005. Five years of product line engineering in a small company. In Proceedings. 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005. 534--543.

[37]

G. Zhang, L. Shen, X. Peng, Z. Xing, and W. Zhao. 2011. Incremental and iterative reengineering towards Software Product Line: An industrial case study. In 2011 27th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM). 418--427.

Cited By

Yoshimura KYamauchi YTakahashi H(2023)Managing Variability of Logistics Robot SystemProceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3579027.3608995(234-241)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579027.3608995
Bashir SAbbas MFerrari ASaadatmand MLindberg P(2023)Requirements Classification for Smart Allocation: A Case Study in the Railway Industry2023 IEEE 31st International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE57278.2023.00028(201-211)Online publication date: Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE57278.2023.00028
Eggert MGünther KMaletschek JMaxiniuc AMann-Wahrenberg AFelfernig AFuentes L(2022)In three steps to software product linesProceedings of the 26th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3546932.3547003(170-177)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3546932.3547003
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Product line adoption in industry: an experience report from the railway domain
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development techniques
      1. Reusability
        Software product lines

Recommendations

A methodical approach to product line adoption
SPLC '14: Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference - Volume 1

The evolution of the U.S. Army's Live Training Transformation (LT2) product line of combat training systems, including the move by the Army to consolidate management of the product line under a single contracting team, has provided a natural experiment ...
Software product line adoption: guidelines from a case study
CEE-SET'08: Proceedings of the Third IFIP TC 2 Central and East European conference on Software engineering techniques

It is possible to proceed with software product line adoption only once without major reinvestments and loss of time and money. In the literature, reported experiences of using the adoption models are not to be found, and especially the suitability of ...
Introduction to Software Product Line Adoption
SPLC '06: Proceedings of the 10th International on Software Product Line Conference

The tremendous benefits of taking a software product line approach are well documented. Organizations have achieved significant reductions in cost and time to market and, at the same time, increased the quality of families of their software systems. ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SPLC '20: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Systems and Software Product Line: Volume A - Volume A

October 2020

323 pages

ISBN:9781450375696

DOI:10.1145/3382025

General Chair:
Roberto Erick Lopez-Herrejon
École de technologie supérieure, Canada

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

ITEA

Conference

SPLC '20

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT

SPLC '20: 24th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference

October 19 - 23, 2020

Quebec, Montreal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

SPLC '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 49 submissions, 35%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 167 of 463 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
227
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)41
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yoshimura KYamauchi YTakahashi H(2023)Managing Variability of Logistics Robot SystemProceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3579027.3608995(234-241)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579027.3608995
Bashir SAbbas MFerrari ASaadatmand MLindberg P(2023)Requirements Classification for Smart Allocation: A Case Study in the Railway Industry2023 IEEE 31st International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)10.1109/RE57278.2023.00028(201-211)Online publication date: Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE57278.2023.00028
Eggert MGünther KMaletschek JMaxiniuc AMann-Wahrenberg AFelfernig AFuentes L(2022)In three steps to software product linesProceedings of the 26th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3546932.3547003(170-177)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3546932.3547003
Six NHerbaut NLopez-Herrejon RSalinesi CFelfernig AFuentes L(2022)Using software product lines to create blockchain productsProceedings of the 26th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3546932.3547001(97-107)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3546932.3547001
Do Carmo Felix Tdos Santos TDa Silva Morais IBentes IDos Santos Miranda VPires FSantos FGiuntini F(2022)A Strategy to Lead with Multiple Dependencies in a Coding Branch Structure: A Case Study with Mobile Device Production2022 International Conference on Computer Technologies (ICCTech)10.1109/ICCTech55650.2022.00024(101-109)Online publication date: Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTech55650.2022.00024
Abbas MFerrari AShatnawi AEnoiu ESaadatmand MSundmark D(2022)On the relationship between similar requirements and similar softwareRequirements Engineering10.1007/s00766-021-00370-4Online publication date: 18-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-021-00370-4
Medeiros RDíaz O(2022)Assisting Mentors in Selecting Newcomers’ Next Task in Software Product Lines: A Recommender System ApproachAdvanced Information Systems Engineering10.1007/978-3-031-07472-1_27(460-476)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07472-1_27
Bucaioni ADi Silvestro FSingh ISaadatmand MMuccini H(2022)Model‐based generation of test scripts across product variants: An experience report from the railway industryJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.249834:11Online publication date: 5-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2498
Abbas MSaadatmand MEnoiu EMousavi MSchobbens P(2021)Requirements-driven reuse recommendationProceedings of the 25th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3461001.3472729(210-210)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3461001.3472729
Kenner AMay RKrüger JSaake GLeich TMousavi MSchobbens P(2021)Safety, security, and configurable software systemsProceedings of the 25th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A10.1145/3461001.3471147(148-159)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3461001.3471147
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents