Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3374135.3385274acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personalized Feedback Emails: A Case Study on Online Introductory Computer Science Courses

Published: 25 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The absence of face-to-face interaction between instructors and students in online courses has been the focus of discussion in many research papers. To compensate for this defect, the concept of Personalized Feedback Email (PFE) was introduced in two undergraduate online courses at the University of Georgia. A distinct component of PFE is a grade forecast for each individual student projected visually in graphs. The quantitative and qualitative data collected from students made it possible to claim that PFE contributes to students' engagement in online courses and encourages the majority of them to do better in class. Given that the rate of contribution of each student in course activities is correlated with student's performance, we were able to show that students who find PFE motivating make higher contributions in class activities. PFE is especially capable of targeting students who stand in the middle of the grade-range and improves their contribution and performance. In this respect, PFE also has a considerable short-term effect. The extensive applications of this effect should be limited by the optimization of the number of PFEs. All this machinery is expected to enable the complex of decision-makers associated with students to adopt the most effective learning strategies. This study shows a drastic and positive change in the performance of students who alter their learning strategy after being exposed to their forecasted grades, which enhances the potential of supervised improvement. The accuracy of forecasting model will be crucial when forecast grades are expected early in the semester to identify at-risk students. Applying machine learning methods, particularly the Greedy Linear Regression, satisfies this expectation and increases the correlation coefficient of the forecasts to 0.98.

References

[1]
A. Anderson, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec. 2014. Engaging with Massive Online Courses. ACM, -. 687--698 pages.
[2]
C. G. Brinton, M. Chiang, S. Jain, H. Lam, Z. Liu, and F. M. F. Wong. 2014. Learning about Social Learning in MOOCs: From Statistical Analysis to Generative Model. IEEE transactions on Learning Technologies 7, 4 (2014), 346--359.
[3]
M. Bullen. 2007. Participation and Critical Thinking in Online University Distance Education. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance 13, 2 (2007), 1--32.
[4]
R.A. Croxton. 2014. The Role of Interactivity in Student Satisfaction and Persistence in Online Learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10, 2 (2014), 314.
[5]
D. Engle, C. Mankoff, and J. Carbrey. 2015. Coursera's Introductory Human Physiology Course: Factors that Characterize Successful Completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 16, 2 (2015).
[6]
J. Fluckiger, Y. T. Y. Vigil, R. Pasco, and K. Danielson. 2010. Formative Feedback: Involving Students as Partners in Assessment to Enhance Learning. College teaching 58, 4 (2010), 136--140.
[7]
A. Forsythe and S. Johnson. 2017. Thanks, but no-Thanks for the Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42, 6 (2017), 850--859.
[8]
S. Goggins and W. Xing. 2016. Building Models Explaining Student Participation Behavior in Asynchronous Online Discussion. Computers & Education 94 (2016), 241--251.
[9]
S. Kurkovsky, C. C. Whitehead, et al. 2005. Using Asynchronous Discussions to Enhance Student Participation in CS Courses. Vol. 37. ACM, na. 111--115 pages.
[10]
Y. Ma, C. Friel, and W. Xing. 2014. Instructional Activities in a Discussion Board forum of an e-Learning Management Ssystem. Springer, na. 112--116 pages.
[11]
D. FO. Onah, J. Sinclair, and R. Boyatt. 2014. Dropout Rates of Massive Open Online Courses: Behavioural Patterns. EDULEARN14 proceedings 1 (2014), 5825--5834.
[12]
G. Piccoli, R. Ahmad, and B. Ives. 2001. Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: A research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic IT Skills Training. MIS quarterly na, na (2001), 401--426.
[13]
J. Reeve and H. Jang. 2006. What Teachers Say and Do to Support Students' Autonomy During a Learning Activity. Journal of educational psychology 98, 1 (2006), 209.
[14]
P. Reimann. 2009. Time is Precious: Variable-and Event-Centred Approaches to Process Analysis in CSCL Research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4, 3 (2009), 239--257.
[15]
C. P. Rosé, R. Carlson, D. Yang, M. Wen, L. Resnick, P. Goldman, and J. Sherer. 2014. Social factors that contribute to attrition in MOOCs. ACM, na. 197--198 pages.
[16]
J. L. Shackelford and M. Maxwell. 2012. Sense of Community in Graduate Online Education: Contribution of Learner to Learner Interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 13, 4 (2012), 228--249.
[17]
G. Stahl, T.D. Koschmann, and D.D. Suthers. 2006. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. na, na.
[18]
S. Voghoei, N. Hashemi Tonekaboni, D. Yazdansepas, and H. R. Arabnia. 2019. University Online Courses: Correlation between Students' Participation Rate and Academic Performance. 6th Annual Conf. on Computational Science & Computational Intelligence, CSCI-ISED na, na (2019), na.
[19]
D. Wu and S. R. Hiltz. 2003. Online Discussions and Perceived Learning. AMCIS 2003 Proceedings na, na (2003), 86.
[20]
D. Yang, T. Sinha, D. Adamson, and C. P. Rosé. 2013. Turn on, Tune in, Drop out: Anticipating Student Dropouts in Massive Open Online Ccourses. Vol. 11. NIPS, Boston. 14 pages.
[21]
M. Zhu, Y. Bergner, Y. Zhang, R. Baker, Y. Wang, and L. Paquette. 2016. Longitudinal Engagement, Performance, and Social Connectivity: a MOOC Case Study using Exponential Random Graph Models. ACM, na. 223--230 pages.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The Placebo Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Human–Computer InteractionACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/352922529:6(1-32)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Piloting Natural Language Generation for Personalized Progress Feedback2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962555(1-8)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Professional Development Strategies and Recommendations for High School Teachers to Teach Computer Science OnlineComputers in the Schools10.1080/07380569.2022.212734340:2(133-151)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Personalized Feedback Emails: A Case Study on Online Introductory Computer Science Courses

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ACMSE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Southeast Conference
          April 2020
          337 pages
          ISBN:9781450371056
          DOI:10.1145/3374135
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 25 May 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions for this article.

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. Class Participation
          2. Data Analysis
          3. Feedback System
          4. Online Course
          5. Personalized Monitoring
          6. Student Success

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Conference

          ACM SE '20
          Sponsor:
          ACM SE '20: 2020 ACM Southeast Conference
          April 2 - 4, 2020
          FL, Tampa, USA

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 502 of 1,023 submissions, 49%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2023)The Placebo Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Human–Computer InteractionACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/352922529:6(1-32)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2023
          • (2022)Piloting Natural Language Generation for Personalized Progress Feedback2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962555(1-8)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
          • (2022)Professional Development Strategies and Recommendations for High School Teachers to Teach Computer Science OnlineComputers in the Schools10.1080/07380569.2022.212734340:2(133-151)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2022
          • (2022)Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature reviewComputers and Education: Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.caeai.2022.1000803(100080)Online publication date: 2022
          • (2021)Industrial Laser Welding Defect Detection and Image Defect Recognition Based on Deep Learning Model DevelopedSymmetry10.3390/sym1309173113:9(1731)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2021
          • (2021)Predicting Pressure Sensitivity to Luminophore Content and Paint Thickness of Pressure-Sensitive Paint Using Artificial Neural NetworkSensors10.3390/s2115518821:15(5188)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2021
          • (2020)Bidirectional Transformer based on online Text-based information to Implement Convolutional Neural Network Model For Secure Business Investment2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462170(322-329)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2020
          • (2020)A Concise Review of Transfer Learning2020 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)10.1109/CSCI51800.2020.00065(344-351)Online publication date: Dec-2020

          View Options

          Get Access

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media