Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3371158.3371234acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making

Published: 15 January 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Algorithmic (data-driven) decision making is increasingly being used to assist or replace human decision making in domains with high societal impact, such as banking (estimating creditworthiness), recruiting (ranking applicants), judiciary (offender profiling) and journalism (recommending news-stories). Consequently, in recent times, multiple research works have attempted to identify (measure) bias or unfairness in algorithmic decisions and propose mechanisms to control (mitigate) such biases. In this tutorial, we introduce the related literature to the cods-comad community. Moreover, going over the more prevalent works on fairness in classification or regression tasks, we explore fairness issues in decision making scenarios, where we need to account for preferences of multiple stakeholders. Specifically, we cover our own past and ongoing works on fairness in recommendation and matching systems. We discuss the notions of fairness in these contexts and propose techniques to achieve them. Additionally, we briefly touch upon the possibility of utilizing user interface of platforms (choice architecture) to achieve fair outcomes in certain scenarios. We conclude the tutorial with a list of open questions and directions for future work.

References

[1]
Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine Bias: there's software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it's biased against blacks. ProPublica (2016).
[2]
Asia J Biega, Krishna P Gummadi, and Gerhard Weikum. 2018. Equity of attention: Amortizing individual fairness in rankings. In ACM SIGIR.
[3]
Abhijnan Chakraborty, Saptarshi Ghosh, Niloy Ganguly, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2015. Can trending news stories create coverage bias? on the impact of high content churn in online news media. In Computation and Journalism Symposium.
[4]
Abhijnan Chakraborty, Aniko Hannak, Asia J Biega, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2017. Fair sharing for sharing economy platforms. In FATREC.
[5]
Abhijnan Chakraborty, Johnnatan Messias, Fabricio Benevenuto, Saptarshi Ghosh, Niloy Ganguly, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2017. Who makes trends? understanding demographic biases in crowdsourced recommendations. In AAAI ICWSM.
[6]
Abhijnan Chakraborty, Nuno Mota, Asia J Biega, Krishna P Gummadi, and Hoda Heidari. 2019. On the Impact of Choice Architectures on Inequality in Online Donation Platforms. In WWW.
[7]
Abhijnan Chakraborty, Gourab K Patro, Niloy Ganguly, Krishna P Gummadi, and Patrick Loiseau. 2019. Equality of voice: Towards fair representation in crowdsourced top-k recommendations. In ACM FAT.
[8]
Abhisek Dash, Anurag Shandilya, Arindam Biswas, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh, and Abhijnan Chakraborty. 2019. Summarizing User-generated Textual Content: Motivation and Methods for Fairness in Algorithmic Summaries. Proceedings of ACM Human Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019).
[9]
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness through awareness. In ACM ITCS.
[10]
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, Nati Srebro, et al. 2016. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In NeurIPS.
[11]
Robert David Hart. 2017. If you're not a white male, artificial intelligence's use in healthcare could be dangerous. Quartz (2017).
[12]
Claire Cain Miller. 2015. Can an algorithm hire better than a human. The New York Times 25 (2015).
[13]
Gourab K Patro, Abhijnan Chakraborty, Niloy Ganguly, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2019. Incremental Fairness in Two-Sided Market Platforms: On Updating Recommendations Fairly. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.10005 (2019).
[14]
Kevin Petrasic, Benjamin Saul, James Greig, Matthew Bornfreund, and Katherine Lamberth. 2017. Algorithms and bias: What lenders need to know. White & Case (2017).
[15]
Tom Sühr, Asia J Biega, Meike Zehlike, Krishna P Gummadi, and Abhijnan Chakraborty. 2019. Two-Sided Fairness for Repeated Matchings in Two-Sided Markets: A Case Study of a Ride-Hailing Platform. In ACM KDD.
[16]
Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2017. Fairness beyond disparate treatment & disparate impact: Learning classification without disparate mistreatment. In WWW.
[17]
Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Isabel Valera, Manuel Gomez Rogriguez, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2017. Fairness Constraints: Mechanisms for Fair Classification. In AISTATS.
[18]
Meike Zehlike, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, Sara Hajian, Mohamed Megahed, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2017. Fa ir: A fair top-k ranking algorithm. In ACM CIKM.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
CoDS COMAD 2020: Proceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD
January 2020
399 pages
ISBN:9781450377386
DOI:10.1145/3371158
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 January 2020

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Tutorial
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CoDS COMAD 2020
CoDS COMAD 2020: 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD
January 5 - 7, 2020
Hyderabad, India

Acceptance Rates

CoDS COMAD 2020 Paper Acceptance Rate 78 of 275 submissions, 28%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 197 of 680 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 320
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media