Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3369740.3369788acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdcnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

bioMCS: A Bio-inspired Collaborative Data Transfer Framework over Fog Computing Platforms in Mobile Crowdsensing

Published: 19 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Mobile crowdsensing (MCS) leverages the participation of active citizens and establishes a cost-effective sensing infrastructure using their devices. The MCS platform allocates sensing tasks, for which individual user reports are collected to enable decision making. Task sensing and communication not only consume user's device energy, but also spawn redundant data leading to network congestion and issues in data management at the platform's end. MCS, being a building block of sustainable smart city applications, must ensure judicious utilization of device energy and network resources. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a bio-inspired data transfer framework, bioMCS, deployed over a fog computing platform and capable of enforcing collaborative sensing among proximate users. bioMCS achieves energy efficiency and robustness through the topological properties of a biological network called transcriptional regulatory network. It employs collaborative sensing to further restrict device energy overhead by taking advantage of energy efficient device-to-device communications like Wi-Fi direct data transfer via group owner. We evaluate our framework through extensive simulation-based experiments and demonstrate that the bioMCS framework achieves better energy and network efficiency compared to individual user-centric data transfer mechanism.

References

[1]
F Montori, PP Jayaraman, A Yavari, A Hassani, and D Georgakopoulos. The curse of sensing: Survey of techniques and challenges to cope with sparse and dense data in mobile crowd sensing for internet of things. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 49:111--125, 2018.
[2]
B Guo, Z Wang, Z Yu, Y Wang, NY Yen, R Huang, and X Zhou. Mobile crowd sensing and computing: The review of an emerging human-powered sensing paradigm. ACM Computing Surveys, 48(1):7, 2015.
[3]
RP Barnwal, N Ghosh, SK Ghosh, and SK Das. Ps-sim: A framework for scalable data simulation and incentivization in participatory sensing-based smart city applications. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 57:64--77, 2019.
[4]
D Camps-Mur, A Garcia-Saavedra, and P Serrano. Device-to-device communications with wifi direct: Overview and experimentation. IEEE Wireless Communications, 20(3):96--104, 2013.
[5]
P Vitello, A Capponi, C Fiandrino, P Giaccone, D Kliazovich, U Sorger, and P Bouvry. Collaborative data delivery for smart city-oriented mobile crowdsensing systems. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pages 1--6. IEEE, 2018.
[6]
TR Sorrells and AD Johnson. Making sense of transcription networks. Cell, 161(4):714--723, 2015.
[7]
T Schaffter, D Marbach, and D Floreano. Genenetweaver: in silico benchmark generation and performance profiling of network inference methods. Bioinformatics, 27(16):2263--2270, 2011.
[8]
B Kamapantula, A Abdelzaher, P Ghosh, M Mayo, E Perkins, and SK Das. Leveraging the robustness of genetic networks: A case study on bio-inspired wireless sensor network topologies. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 5(3):323--339, 2014.
[9]
A Nazi, M Raj, M Di Francesco, P Ghosh, and SK Das. Deployment of robust wireless sensor networks using gene regulatory networks: An isomorphism-based approach. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 13:246--257, 2014.
[10]
A Nazi, M Raj, M Di Francesco, P Ghosh, and SK Das. Efficient communications in wireless sensor networks based on biological robustness. International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), pages 161--168, 2016.
[11]
S Roy, VK Shah, and SK Das. Design of robust and efficient topology using enhanced gene regulatory networks. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, 4(2):73--87, 2018.
[12]
S Roy, V Shah, and S Das. Characterization of e. coli gene regulatory network and its topological enhancement by edge rewiring. In 9th International Conference on Bio-inspired Information and Communications Technologies, pages 391--398, 2016.
[13]
S Roy, M Raj, P Ghosh, and SK Das. Role of motifs in topological robustness of gene regulatory networks. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC, Paris, France, pages 1--6, 2017.
[14]
S Roy, N Ghosh, and SK Das. biosmartsense: A bio-inspired data collection framework for energy-efficient qoi-aware smart city applications. In IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), Kyoto, Japan, March, 2019.
[15]
X-Y Li, P-J Wan, Y Wang, and O Frieder. Sparse power efficient topology for wireless networks. In 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 3839--3848. IEEE, 2002.
[16]
C Yu, B Lee, and HY Youn. Energy efficient routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless communications and mobile computing, 3(8):959--973, 2003.
[17]
D Hasenfratz, O Saukh, S Sturzenegger, and L Thiele. Participatory air pollution monitoring using smartphones. Mobile Sensing, 1:1--5, 2012.
[18]
I Schweizer, R Bärtl, A Schulz, F Probst, and M Mühläuser. Noisemap-real-time participatory noise maps. In 2nd international Workshop on Sensing Applications on Mobile Phones, pages 1--5. Citeseer, 2011.
[19]
K Han, C Zhang, and J Luo. Taming the uncertainty: Budget limited robust crowdsensing through online learning. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 24(3):1462--1475, 2016.
[20]
L Wang, D Zhang, Z Yan, H Xiong, and B Xie. Effsense: A novel mobile crowdsensing framework for energy-efficient and cost-effective data uploading. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 45(12):1549--1563, 2015.
[21]
ND Lane, Y Chon, L Zhou, Y Zhang, F Li, D Kim, G Ding, F Zhao, and H Cha. Piggyback crowdsensing (pcs): Energy efficient crowdsourcing of mobile sensor data by exploiting smartphone app opportunities. In 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, page 7. ACM, 2013.
[22]
J Liu, L Bic, H Gong, and S Zhan. Data collection for mobile crowdsensing in the presence of selfishness. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2016(1):82, 2016.
[23]
P Bellavista, A Corradi, L Foschini, and R Ianniello. Scalable and cost-effective assignment of mobile crowdsensing tasks based on profiling trends and prediction: The participact living lab experience. Sensors, 15(8):18613--18640, 2015.
[24]
PP Jayaraman, JB Gomes, H Nguyen, ZS Abdallah, S Krishnaswamy, and A Zaslavsky. Scalable energy-efficient distributed data analytics for crowdsensing applications in mobile environments. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2(3):109--123, 2015.
[25]
W Sherchan, PP Jayaraman, S Krishnaswamy, A Zaslavsky, S Loke, and A Sinha. Using on-the-move mining for mobile crowdsensing. In IEEE 13th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, pages 115--124. IEEE, 2012.
[26]
C Fiandrino, F Anjomshoa, B Kantarci, D Kliazovich, P Bouvry, and JN Matthews. Sociability-driven framework for data acquisition in mobile crowdsensing over fog computing platforms for smart cities. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 2(4):345--358, 2017.
[27]
H Zhang, Y Wang, and CC Tan. Wd2: An improved wifi-direct group formation protocol. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM MobiCom workshop on Challenged networks, pages 55--60. ACM, 2014.
[28]
UB Menegato, LS Cimino, S Delabida, Medeiros FA, JC Lima, and RAR Oliveira. Dynamic clustering in wifi-direct technology. In 12th ACM international symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access, pages 25--29. ACM, 2014.
[29]
A Laha, X Cao, W Shen, X Tian, and Y Cheng. An energy efficient routing protocol for device-to-device based multihop smartphone networks. In IEEE International conference on Communications (ICC), pages 5448--5453. IEEE, 2015.
[30]
V Arnaboldi, MGG Campana, and F Delmastro. Context-aware configuration and management of wifi-direct groups for real opportunistic networks. In IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Ad hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), pages 266--274. IEEE, 2017.
[31]
RR Roy. Random walk mobility. In Handbook of Mobile Ad hoc Networks for Mobility Models, pages 35--63. Springer, 2011.
[32]
VA Davies et al. Evaluating mobility models within an ad hoc network. Master's thesis, Citeseer, 2000.
[33]
A Nazi, M Raj, M Di Francesco, P Ghosh, and SK Das. Efficient communications in wireless sensor networks based on biological robustness. In IEEE Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), pages 161--168. IEEE, 2016.
[34]
F Pedregosa, G Varoquaux, A Gramfort, V Michel, B Thirion, O Grisel, M Blondel, P Prettenhofer, R Weiss, V Dubourg, and et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(Oct):2825--2830, 2011.
[35]
MEJ Newman. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23):8577--8582, 2006.
[36]
M Nikolić. Measuring similarity of graph nodes by neighbor matching. Intelligent Data Analysis, 16(6):865--878, 2012.
[37]
N Matloff. Introduction to discrete-event simulation and the simpy language. Dept of Computer Science. University of California at Davis., 2.
[38]
V Latora and M Marchiori. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical Review Letters, 87(19):198701, 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Smart connected farms and networked farmers to improve crop production, sustainability and profitabilityFrontiers in Agronomy10.3389/fagro.2024.14108296Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Reinforcement Learning-Based Optimization Framework for Application Component Migration in NFV Cloud-Fog EnvironmentsIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2022.321772320:2(1866-1883)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)Bio-Inspired Design of Biosensor NetworksEncyclopedia of Sensors and Biosensors10.1016/B978-0-12-822548-6.00131-X(86-102)Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICDCN '20: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking
January 2020
460 pages
ISBN:9781450377515
DOI:10.1145/3369740
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 February 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Collaborative sensing
  2. Fog computing
  3. Mobile crowdsensing
  4. Smart city applications
  5. Transcriptional regulatory network

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICDCN 2020

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Smart connected farms and networked farmers to improve crop production, sustainability and profitabilityFrontiers in Agronomy10.3389/fagro.2024.14108296Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Reinforcement Learning-Based Optimization Framework for Application Component Migration in NFV Cloud-Fog EnvironmentsIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2022.321772320:2(1866-1883)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)Bio-Inspired Design of Biosensor NetworksEncyclopedia of Sensors and Biosensors10.1016/B978-0-12-822548-6.00131-X(86-102)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2021)Transcriptional Regulatory Network Topology with Applications to Bio-inspired Networking: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/346826654:8(1-36)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Exploring Biological Robustness for Reliable Multi-UAV NetworksIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2021.307754418:3(2776-2788)Online publication date: Sep-2021
  • (2021)Adaptive Motif-based Topology Control in Mobile Software Defined Wireless Sensor Networks2021 IEEE 18th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)10.1109/CCNC49032.2021.9369601(1-6)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2021
  • (2021)bioMCS 2.0: A distributed, energy-aware fog-based framework for data forwarding in mobile crowdsensingPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.10138173(101381)Online publication date: Jun-2021
  • (2021)Enhancing mobile crowdsensing in Fog-based Internet of Things utilizing Harris hawks optimizationJournal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing10.1007/s12652-021-03344-013:9(4543-4558)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Optimal Data Collection for Mobile Crowdsensing Over Integrated Cellular and Opportunistic NetworksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30195378(157270-157283)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2020)bioSmartSense+: A bio-inspired probabilistic data collection framework for priority-based event reporting in IoT environmentsPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2020.10117967(101179)Online publication date: Sep-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media