Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3369457.3369517acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Humanoid Robots as Teaching Assistants in an Arab School

Published: 10 January 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The proliferation of educational robots has led to an investigation of suitable roles that humanoids robots can take in the classroom. In the recent past, the focus has been on humanoids being used in student focused roles or as peer learners. Coupled with the seemingly absence of any case studies of educational robots in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) or the Arab world, we present a study where we employed the Nao robot as a teaching assistant in a local primary school in Abu Dhabi, UAE. The Nao robot was used to revise a topic in Mathematics and its efficacy in comparison to a human teaching assistant was measured through pre and post test scores, facial expressions and indirect verbal responses. Our results showed that while there no significant differences in test scores, the children were much more engaged when interacting with the Nao robot. We conclude with a positive outlook towards the implementation of humanoid robots in UAE classrooms.

References

[1]
Kasumi Abe, Chie Hieida, Muhammad Attamimi, Takayuki Nagai, Takayuki Shimotomai, Takashi Omori, and Natsuki Oka. 2014. Toward playmate robots that can play with children considering personality. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Human-agent interaction. ACM, 165--168.
[2]
Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad, Omar Mubin, and Joanne Orlando. 2016. Understanding behaviours and roles for social and adaptive robots in education: teacher's perspective. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on human agent interaction. ACM, 297--304.
[3]
Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad, Omar Mubin, and Joanne Orlando. 2017. Adaptive social robot for sustaining social engagement during long-term children--robot interaction. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 33, 12 (2017), 943--962.
[4]
Fady S Alnajjar, Abdulrahman Majed Renawi, Massimiliano Cappuccio, and Omar Mubin. 2019. A Low-Cost Autonomous Attention Assessment System for Robot Intervention with Autistic Children. In 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, 787--792.
[5]
Paul Baxter, Emily Ashurst, James Kennedy, Emmanuel Senft, Séverin Lemaignan, and Tony Belpaeme. 2015. The wider supportive role of social robots in the classroom for teachers. In 1st Int. Workshop on Educational Robotics at the Int. Conf. Social Robotics. Paris, France, Vol. 6.
[6]
Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy, Aditi Ramachandran, Brian Scassellati, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018. Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics 3, 21 (2018), eaat5954.
[7]
Fernando Garcia-Sanjuan, Javier Jaen, Vicente Nacher, and Alejandro Catala. 2015. Design and evaluation of a tangible-mediated robot for kindergarten instruction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. ACM, 3.
[8]
David Gouaillier, Vincent Hugel, Pierre Blazevic, Chris Kilner, Jérôme Monceaux, Pascal Lafourcade, Brice Marnier, Julien Serre, and Bruno Maisonnier. 2009. Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. In Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA'09. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 769--774.
[9]
Mohanad Halaweh. 2018. artificial intelligence government (Gov. 3.0): the UAE leading model. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 62 (2018), 269--272.
[10]
Michael Henderson, Neil Selwyn, and Rachel Aston. 2017. What works and why? Student perceptions of 'useful' digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education 42, 8 (2017), 1567--1579.
[11]
James Kennedy, Séverin Lemaignan, and Tony Belpaeme. 2016. The cautious attitude of teachers towards social robots in schools. In Robots 4 Learning Workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2016.
[12]
Jacqueline Kory Westlund, Goren Gordon, Samuel Spaulding, Jin Joo Lee, Luke Plummer, Marayna Martinez, Madhurima Das, and Cynthia Breazeal. 2016. Lessons from teachers on performing HRI studies with young children in schools. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. IEEE Press, 383--390.
[13]
Nikolaos Mavridis, Marina-Selini Katsaiti, Silvia Naef, Abdullah Falasi, Abdulrahman Nuaimi, Hamdan Araifi, and Ahmed Kitbi. 2012. Opinions and attitudes toward humanoid robots in the Middle East. AI & society 27, 4 (2012), 517--534.
[14]
Omar Mubin, Catherine J Stevens, Suleman Shahid, Abdullah Al Mahmud, and Jian-Jie Dong. 2013. A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning 1, 209--0015 (2013), 13.
[15]
Natalia Reich-Stiebert and Friederike Eyssel. 2016. Robots in the classroom: what teachers think about teaching and learning with education robots. In Intl Conf on Social Robotics. Springer, 671--680.
[16]
Maha Salem, Micheline Ziadee, and Majd Sakr. 2014. Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of politeness and culture on robot acceptance and anthropomorphization. In 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 74--81.
[17]
Sofia Serholt, Wolmet Barendregt, Asimina Vasalou, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Aidan Jones, Sofia Petisca, and Ana Paiva. 2017. The case of classroom robots: Teachers' deliberations on the ethical tensions. Ai & Society 32, 4 (2017), 613--631.
[18]
Amanda JC Sharkey. 2016. Should we welcome robot teachers? Ethics and Information Technology 18, 4 (2016), 283--297.
[19]
Softbank Robotics 2017. Softbank Robotics. https://www.ald.softbankrobotics.com/en/robots/nao.
[20]
Elizabeth Würtz. 2005. Intercultural communication on web sites: A cross-cultural analysis of web sites from high-contextcultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 1 (2005), 274--299.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Using Social Robotics to Identify Educational Behavior: A SurveyElectronics10.3390/electronics1319395613:19(3956)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Design and Implementation of Adam: A Humanoid Robotic Head with Social Interaction CapabilitiesApplied System Innovation10.3390/asi70300427:3(42)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
  • (2024)NAO vs. Pepper: Speech Recognition Performance AssessmentHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_12(156-167)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Humanoid Robots as Teaching Assistants in an Arab School

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '19: Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction
    December 2019
    631 pages
    ISBN:9781450376969
    DOI:10.1145/3369457
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • HFESA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society of Australia Inc.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Arab School
    2. Nao
    3. Social Robots
    4. Teaching Assistants

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    OZCHI'19
    OZCHI'19: 31ST AUSTRALIAN CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER-INTERACTION
    December 2 - 5, 2019
    WA, Fremantle, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Using Social Robotics to Identify Educational Behavior: A SurveyElectronics10.3390/electronics1319395613:19(3956)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Design and Implementation of Adam: A Humanoid Robotic Head with Social Interaction CapabilitiesApplied System Innovation10.3390/asi70300427:3(42)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
    • (2024)NAO vs. Pepper: Speech Recognition Performance AssessmentHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_12(156-167)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2023)A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications of Robots and Natural Language Processing in EducationElectronics10.3390/electronics1213286412:13(2864)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Exploring technology acceptance: Teachers' perspectives on robotics in teaching and learning in the UAEContemporary Educational Technology10.30935/cedtech/1364615:4(ep469)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Experimental Investigation of an Interactive Animatronic Robotic Head Connected to ChatGPT2023 5th International Conference on Bio-engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)10.1109/BioSMART58455.2023.10162099(1-4)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Pedagogical exploration and technological development of a humanoid robotic system for teaching to and learning in young childrenCogent Education10.1080/2331186X.2023.217918110:1Online publication date: 16-Feb-2023
    • (2022)A Survey on Recent Advances in Social RoboticsRobotics10.3390/robotics1104007511:4(75)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2022
    • (2022)Adolescents' Perceptions of the Role of Social Robots in Civic Participation: An Exploratory Study2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889636(826-830)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
    • (2022)A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and futureRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193156:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media