Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3368756.3368977acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmartcityappConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancement wireless network stability based on spatial dependency

Published: 02 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The famous Ad hoc network is a part of the IoT environment in which MANET network present as good solution in many IoT applications. Different categories of routing protocol developed in it, such as proactive and reactive protocols. However, The mobility concept has an impact on the evolution of network performances. In this paper we will work on one of the best proactive protocol in MANET, OLSR. In OLSR routing protocol, the mobility influences the choice of MultiPoint Relay (MPR). Therefore, our goal is to propose and implement the algorithm based on Average Spatial Dependency metric "ASD" that will enhance MPR selection procedure in Mobile environment. Each node exchange these values with its neighbors using the control messages of OLSR routing protocol (Hello messages). Furthermore, if the nodes have equal reachability, the node with the highest ASD value will be selected as MPR. In our simulation, we used the NS3 simulator and the Manhattan mobility model to simulate a smart city environment. Through the data obtained from simulation, it was found that the network performance in mobility network can be enhanced, with regard especially to packet loss, end-to-end delay and Throughput.

References

[1]
Hicham Amraoui, Ahmed Habbani, and Abdelmajid Hajami. 2016. Mobility quantification for MultiPoint Relays selection algorithm in Mobile Ad hoc Networks. In 2016 5th International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS). IEEE, 278--283.
[2]
M. Appiah. 2016. The impact of mobility models on the performance of mobile ad hoc network (MANET). In 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering (ICACCE). 208--213.
[3]
Nils Aschenbruck, Raphael Ernst, Elmar Gerhards-Padilla, and Matthias Schwamborn. [n.d.]. BonnMotion: a mobility scenario generation and analysis tool. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 51.
[4]
Fan Bai, Narayanan Sadagopan, and Ahmed Helmy. 2003. IMPORTANT: A framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of RouTing protocols for Adhoc NeTworks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37428), Vol. 2. IEEE, 825--835.
[5]
Josh Broch, David A. Maltz, David B. Johnson, Yih-Chun Hu, and Jorjeta Jetcheva. [n.d.]. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. ACM, 85--97.
[6]
Ahmed Helmy FanBai. [n.d.]. A survey of mobility models in wireless Ad Hoc Networks. ([n. d.]).
[7]
Thomas R. Henderson, Mathieu Lacage, George F. Riley, Craig Dowell, and Joseph Kopena. [n.d.]. Network simulations with the ns-3 simulator. 14, 14 ([n. d.]), 527.
[8]
AY Khan, S Rashid, and A Iqbal. 2005. Mobility vs. predictive MPR selection for mobile ad hoc networks using OLSR. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies, 2005. IEEE, 52--57.
[9]
T. Luo and T. Murase. 2017. User cooperative mobility for QoS improvement in ad-hoc networks. In 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications Networking Conference (CCNC). 276--279.
[10]
Ali Ouacha, Noureddine Lakki, Jamal El Abbadi, Ahmed Habbani, Bachir Bouamoud, and Mohammed Elkoutbi. 2013. Reliable MPR selection based on link lifetime-prediction method. In 2013 10th IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, SENSING AND CONTROL (ICNSC). IEEE, 11--16.
[11]
K. Park, H. Kim, and S. Lee. 2015. Mobility State Based Routing Method in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Services. 473--474.
[12]
C. Pathak, A. Shrivastava, and A. Jain. 2016. Ad-hoc on demand distance vector routing protocol using Dijkastra's algorithm (AODV-D) for high throughput in VANET (Vehicular Ad-hoc Network). In 2016 11th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS). 355--359.
[13]
Subir Kumar Sarkar, T. G. Basavaraju, and C. Puttamadappa. 2016. Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Principles, Protocols, and Applications, Second Edition. (2016).
[14]
Mohammed Souidi, Ahmed Habbani, Halim Berradi, and Fatna El Mahdi. 2018. Geographic forwarding rules to reduce broadcast redundancy in mobile ad hoc wireless networks. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2018), 1--11.
[15]
Mohammed Souidi, Ahmed Habbani, Halim Berradi, and Bilal Essaid. 2017. Node localization to optimize the MPR selection in smart mobile communication. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Smart Digital Environment. ACM, 8--13.
[16]
T. Sudhakar and H. H. Inbarani. 2017. Spatial group mobility model scenarios formation in mobile ad hoc networks. In 2017 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI). 1--5.
[17]
R. T. Tandazo, S. C. Carrión, P. L. Gonzalez, and K. M. Cueva. 2015. Evaluation of mobility models to mobile networks in emergency and rescue scenarios AVM, UPM, pursue, waypoint and brownian. In 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 1--6.
[18]
F. Tang, M. Guo, S. Guo, and C. Xu. 2016. Mobility Prediction Based Joint Stable Routing and Channel Assignment for Mobile Ad Hoc Cognitive Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 27, 3 (March 2016), 789--802.
[19]
Y. Yayeh, H. Lin, G. Berie, A. B. Adege, L. Yen, and S. Jeng. 2018. Mobility prediction in mobile ad-hoc network using deep learning. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI). 1203--1206.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Security in MANETs: The Blockchain IssueAdvanced Communication Systems and Information Security10.1007/978-3-030-61143-9_18(219-232)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SCA '19: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications
October 2019
788 pages
ISBN:9781450362894
DOI:10.1145/3368756
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. IoT
  2. MANET
  3. OLSR
  4. mobility
  5. smart environment
  6. spatial dependency

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SCA2019

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Security in MANETs: The Blockchain IssueAdvanced Communication Systems and Information Security10.1007/978-3-030-61143-9_18(219-232)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media