Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3366424.3383107acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Unbiased Learning to Rank: Counterfactual and Online Approaches

Published: 20 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

This tutorial is about Unbiased Learning to Rank, a recent research field that aims to learn unbiased user preferences from biased user interactions. We will provide an overview of the two main families of methods in Unbiased Learning to Rank: Counterfactual Learning to Rank (CLTR) and Online Learning to Rank (OLTR) and their underlying theory. First, the tutorial will start with a brief introduction to the general Learning to Rank (LTR) field and the difficulties user interactions pose for traditional supervised LTR methods. The second part will cover Counterfactual Learning to Rank (CLTR), a LTR field that sprung out of click models. Using an explicit model of user biases, CLTR methods correct for them in their learning process and can learn from historical data. Besides these methods, we will also cover practical considerations, such as how certain biases can be estimated. In the third part of the tutorial we focus on Online Learning to Rank (OLTR), methods that learn by directly interacting with users and dealing with biases by adding stochasticity to displayed results. We will cover cascading bandits, dueling bandit techniques and the most recent pairwise differentiable approach. Finally, in the concluding part of the tutorial, both approaches are contrasted, highlighting their relative strengths and weaknesses, and presenting future directions of research. For LTR practitioners our comparison gives guidance on how the choice between methods should be made. For the field of Information Retrieval (IR) we aim to provide an essential guide on unbiased LTR to understanding and choosing between methodologies.

References

[1]
Aman Agarwal, Ivan Zaitsev, Xuanhui Wang, Cheng Li, Marc Najork, and Thorsten Joachims. 2019. Estimating Position Bias without Intrusive Interventions. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 474–482.
[2]
Qingyao Ai, Keping Bi, Cheng Luo, Jiafeng Guo, and W. Bruce Croft. 2018. Unbiased Learning to Rank with Unbiased Propensity Estimation. (2018), 385–394.
[3]
Ben Carterette and Praveen Chandar. 2018. Offline Comparative Evaluation with Incremental, Minimally-Invasive Online Feedback. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (SIGIR ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 705–714.
[4]
Olivier Chapelle and Yi Chang. 2011. Yahoo! Learning to Rank Challenge Overview. In Proceedings of the Learning to Rank Challenge. 1–24.
[5]
Aleksandr Chuklin, Ilya Markov, and Maarten de Rijke. 2015. Click models for web search. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 7, 3(2015), 1–115.
[6]
Nick Craswell, Onno Zoeter, Michael Taylor, and Bill Ramsey. 2008. An Experimental Comparison of Click Position-bias Models. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Palo Alto, California, USA) (WSDM ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 87–94.
[7]
Katja Hofmann, Shimon Whiteson, and Maarten de Rijke. 2013. Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Listwise and Pairwise Online Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval. Information Retrieval 16, 1 (Feb 2013), 63–90.
[8]
Rolf Jagerman, Harrie Oosterhuis, and Maarten de Rijke. 2019. To Model or to Intervene: A Comparison of Counterfactual and Online Learning to Rank from User Interactions. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Paris, France) (SIGIR’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331269
[9]
Thorsten Joachims. 2002. Optimizing Search Engines Using Clickthrough Data. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) (KDD ’02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133–142.
[10]
Thorsten Joachims. 2003. Evaluating Retrieval Performance using Clickthrough Data. In Text Mining, J. Franke, G. Nakhaeizadeh, and I. Renz (Eds.). Physica/Springer Verlag, 79–96.
[11]
Thorsten Joachims, Adith Swaminathan, and Tobias Schnabel. 2017. Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedback. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (WSDM ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 781–789.
[12]
Tie-Yan Liu. 2009. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 3, 3 (2009), 225–331.
[13]
Claudio Lucchese, Franco Maria Nardini, Rama Kumar Pasumarthi, Sebastian Bruch, Michael Bendersky, Xuanhui Wang, Harrie Oosterhuis, Rolf Jagerman, and Maarten de Rijke. 2019. Learning to Rank in Theory and Practice: From Gradient Boosting to Neural Networks and Unbiased Learning. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (Paris, France) (SIGIR’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1419–1420.
[14]
Harrie Oosterhuis. 2018. Learning to rank and evaluation in the online setting. 12th Russian Summer School in Information Retrieval (RuSSIR 2018).
[15]
Harrie Oosterhuis and Maarten de Rijke. 2017. Balancing Speed and Quality in Online Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management(Singapore, Singapore) (CIKM ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 277–286.
[16]
Harrie Oosterhuis and Maarten de Rijke. 2018. Differentiable Unbiased Online Learning to Rank. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Torino, Italy) (CIKM ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1293–1302.
[17]
Harrie Oosterhuis, Anne Schuth, and Maarten de Rijke. 2016. Probabilistic multileave gradient descent. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 661–668.
[18]
Zohreh Ovaisi, Ragib Ahsan, Yifan Zhang, Kathryn Vasilaky, and Elena Zheleva. 2020. Correcting for Selection Bias in Learning-to-rank Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.11358(2020).
[19]
Mark Sanderson. 2010. Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 4, 4 (2010), 247–375.
[20]
Anne Schuth, Harrie Oosterhuis, Shimon Whiteson, and Maarten de Rijke. 2016. Multileave Gradient Descent for Fast Online Learning to Rank. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (San Francisco, California, USA) (WSDM ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 457–466.
[21]
Xuanhui Wang, Michael Bendersky, Donald Metzler, and Marc Najork. 2016. Learning to Rank with Selection Bias in Personal Search. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(Pisa, Italy) (SIGIR ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 115–124.
[22]
Yisong Yue and Thorsten Joachims. 2009. Interactively Optimizing Information Retrieval Systems As a Dueling Bandits Problem. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) (ICML ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1201–1208.
[23]
Yisong Yue, Rajan Patel, and Hein Roehrig. 2010. Beyond Position Bias: Examining Result Attractiveness As a Source of Presentation Bias in Clickthrough Data. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (Raleigh, North Carolina, USA) (WWW ’10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1011–1018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Unbiased Learning to Rank: On Recent Advances and Practical ApplicationsProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3636451(1118-1121)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Privacy Preserved Federated Learning for Online Ranking System (OLTR) for 6G Internet TechnologyWireless Personal Communications10.1007/s11277-024-11206-zOnline publication date: 31-May-2024
  • (2023)Gamified Text Testing for Sustainable FairnessSustainability10.3390/su1503229215:3(2292)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Unbiased Learning to Rank: Counterfactual and Online Approaches
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW '20: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020
    April 2020
    854 pages
    ISBN:9781450370240
    DOI:10.1145/3366424
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 April 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    WWW '20
    Sponsor:
    WWW '20: The Web Conference 2020
    April 20 - 24, 2020
    Taipei, Taiwan

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Unbiased Learning to Rank: On Recent Advances and Practical ApplicationsProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3636451(1118-1121)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Privacy Preserved Federated Learning for Online Ranking System (OLTR) for 6G Internet TechnologyWireless Personal Communications10.1007/s11277-024-11206-zOnline publication date: 31-May-2024
    • (2023)Gamified Text Testing for Sustainable FairnessSustainability10.3390/su1503229215:3(2292)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Recent Advancements in Unbiased Learning to RankProceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation10.1145/3632754.3632942(145-148)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Causal Collaborative FilteringProceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3578337.3605122(235-245)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
    • (2023)A Deep Generative Recommendation Method for Unbiased Learning from Implicit FeedbackProceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3578337.3605114(87-93)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Recent Advances in the Foundations and Applications of Unbiased Learning to RankProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3594247(3440-3443)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Safe Deployment for Counterfactual Learning to Rank with Exposure-Based Risk MinimizationProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3591760(249-258)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
    • (2022)Reaching the End of UnbiasednessProceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval10.1145/3539813.3545137(264-274)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Offline Evaluation of Ranked Lists using Parametric Estimation of PropensitiesProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3532032(622-632)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media