Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3356392.3365222acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Understanding Movement in Context with Heterogeneous Data

Published: 05 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Movement data, as captured by myriad sensors, has been growing exponentially. Hence, multidisciplinary approaches for analyzing movement has become feasible. Though, movement pertains to a large variety of domains and applications, the focus of this position paper is understanding human movement (mobility) in various forms. We position maps as heterogeneous, multidimensional and digital representation of reality and advocate their role in contextualizing movement. We overview the main problems for analyzing human mobility with special attention to movement in context, leveraging heterogeneous data. We review the state-of-the-art in solving these problems and describe remaining open problems and challenges for future work. Finally, we offer a view of existing as well as future mapping and location services that could enable these.

References

[1]
S. P. A. Alewijnse, K. Buchin, M. Buchin, S. Sijben, and M. A. Westenberg. 2018. Model-Based Segmentation and Classification of Trajectories. Algorithmica 80, 8 (2018), 2422--2452.
[2]
M. Buchin, S. Dodge, and B. Speckmann. 2014. Similarity of trajectories taking into account geographic context. J. of Spatial Information Science 9 (2014), 101--124.
[3]
M. Buchin, A. Driemel, M. J. van Kreveld, and V. Sacristán Adinolfi. 2011. Segmenting trajectories: A framework and algorithms using spatiotemporal criteria. J. of Spatial Information Science 3 (2011), 33--63.
[4]
C. Culnane, B. I. P. Rubinstein, and V. Teague. 2019. Stop the Open Data Bus, We Want to Get Off. arXiv:cs.CR/1908.05004
[5]
B. Custers, M. van de Kerkhof, W. Meulemans, B. Speckmann, and F. Staals. 2019. Maximum Physically Consistent Trajectories. In Proc. 2019 ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS. to appear.
[6]
P. Desai, S. W Loke, A. Desai, and J. Singh. 2011. Multi-agent based vehicular congestion management. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. (IV). IEEE, 1031--1036.
[7]
S. Dodge. 2019. A Data Science Framework for Movement. Geographical Analysis to appear (2019), 1--21.
[8]
S. Dodge, R. Weibel, S. C. Ahearn, M. Buchin, and J. A. Miller. 2016. Analysis of movement data. Int. J. of GIS 30, 5 (2016), 825--834.
[9]
A. Graser. 2019. MovingPandas: Efficient Structures for Movement Data in Python. GI_Forum 1 (2019), 54--68.
[10]
C. Gschwend and P. Laube. 2012. Challenges of Context-Aware Movement Analysis - Lessons Learned about Crucial Data Requirements and Pre-Processing. In Proc. 20th GIS Research UK Annual Conference. 241--246.
[11]
I. Kostitsyna, M. van Kreveld, M. Löffler, B. Speckmann, and F. Staals. 2015. Trajectory Grouping Structure under Geodesic Distance. In Proc. 31st Int. Symp. on Comput. Geom. 674--688.
[12]
J. Krumm. 2007. Inference Attacks on Location Tracks. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Pervasive Computing (LNCS 4480). 127--143.
[13]
P. Laube. 2014. Computational Movement Analysis. Springer Publishing Co., Inc.
[14]
J. A. Long. 2016. Kinematic interpolation of movement data. Int. J. of GIS 30, 5 (2016), 854--868.
[15]
K. Ouyang, R. Shokri, D. S. Rosenblum, and W. Yang. 2018. A Non-Parametric Generative Model for Human Trajectories. In Proc. 27th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. 3812--3817.
[16]
L. Pappalardo, G. Barlacchi, F. Simini, and R. Pellungrini. 2019. scikit-mobility: An open-source Python library for human mobility analysis and simulation. arXiv e-prints (Jul 2019), arXiv:1907.07062.
[17]
M. Rahmani, E. Jenelius, and H. N Koutsopoulos. 2014. Floating car and camera data fusion for non-parametric route travel time estimation. In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 1286--1291.
[18]
K. Siła-Nowicka, J. Vandrol, T. Oshan, J. A. Long, U. Demšar, and A. S. Fotheringham. 2016. Analysis of human mobility patterns from GPS trajectories and contextual information. Int. J. of GIS 30, 5 (2016), 881--906.
[19]
M. Wright and R. Horowitz. 2016. Fusing loop and GPS probe measurements to estimate freeway density. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 12 (2016), 3577--3590.
[20]
J. Zhang, Y. Zheng, J. Sun, and D. Qi. 2019. Flow Prediction in Spatio-Temporal Networks Based on Multitask Deep Learning. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering to appear (2019), 1--11.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)The 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computing with Multifaceted Movement Data (MOVE++ 2019)SIGSPATIAL Special10.1145/3383653.338365611:3(9-11)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2020

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Movement in Context with Heterogeneous Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MOVE'19: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computing with Multifaceted Movement Data
    November 2019
    25 pages
    ISBN:9781450369510
    DOI:10.1145/3356392
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 November 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Movement data
    2. context
    3. maps
    4. trajectories

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SIGSPATIAL '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    MOVE'19 Paper Acceptance Rate 5 of 8 submissions, 63%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 5 of 8 submissions, 63%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)The 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computing with Multifaceted Movement Data (MOVE++ 2019)SIGSPATIAL Special10.1145/3383653.338365611:3(9-11)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media