Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3350546.3352559acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Potential gain as a centrality measure

Published: 14 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Navigability is a distinctive features of graphs associated with artificial or natural systems whose primary goal is the transportation of information or goods. We say that a graph is navigable when an agent is able to efficiently reach any target node in by means of local routing decisions. In a social network navigability translates to the ability of reaching an individual through personal contacts. Graph navigability is well-studied, but a fundamental question is still open: why are some individuals more likely than others to be reached via short, friend-of-a-friend, communication chains? In this article we answer the question above by proposing a novel centrality metric called the potential gain, which, in an informal sense, quantifies the easiness at which a target node can be reached. We define two variants of the potential gain, called the geometric and the exponential potential gain, and present fast algorithms to compute them. The geometric and the potential gain are the first instances of a novel class of composite centrality metrics, i.e., centrality metrics which combine the popularity of a node in G with its similarity to all other nodes. As shown in previous studies, popularity and similarity are two main criteria which regulate the way humans seek for information in large networks such as Wikipedia. We give a formal proof that the potential gain of a node is always equivalent to the product of its degree centrality (which captures popularity) and its Katz centrality (which captures similarity).

References

[1]
S. Agreste, P. De Meo, E. Ferrara, S. Piccolo, and A. Provetti. 2015. Analysis of a Heterogeneous Social Network of Humans and Cultural Objects. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 45, 4(2015), 559–570.
[2]
S. Agreste, P. De Meo, E. Ferrara, S. Piccolo, and A. Provetti. 2015. Trust Networks: Topology, Dynamics, and Measurements. IEEE Internet Computing 19, 6 (2015), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2015.93
[3]
R. Alber, I. Albert, and G.L. Nakarado. 2004. Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. Physical review E 69, 2 (2004), 025103.
[4]
M. Benzi and C. Klymko. 2013. Total communicability as a centrality measure. Journal of Complex Networks 1, 2 (2013), 124–149.
[5]
M. Benzi and C. Klymko. 2015. On the limiting behavior of parameter-dependent network centrality measures. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 36, 2 (2015), 686–706.
[6]
Paolo Boldi. 2015. Large-scale Network Analytics: Diffusion-based Computation of Distances and Geometric Centralities. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, WWW 2015, Florence, Italy, May 18-22, 2015 - Companion Volume, Aldo Gangemi, Stefano Leonardi, and Alessandro Panconesi (Eds.). ACM, 1313. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2741703
[7]
Paolo Boldi, Alessandro Luongo, and Sebastiano Vigna. 2017. Rank monotonicity in centrality measures. Network Science 5, 4 (2017), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2017.21
[8]
Paolo Boldi and Sebastiano Vigna. 2014. Axioms for Centrality. Internet Mathematics 10, 3-4 (2014), 222–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427951.2013.865686
[9]
S. Brin and L. Page. 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems 30, 1-7 (1998), 107–117.
[10]
A. Broder, R. Kumar, F. Maghoul, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Stata, A. Tomkins, and J. Wiener. 2000. Graph structure in the Web. Computer Networks 33, 1-6 (2000), 309–320.
[11]
F. Chung, P. Horn, and A. Tsiatas. 2009. Distributing antidote using Pagerank vectors. Internet Mathematics 6, 2 (2009), 237–254.
[12]
D. Cvetkovic, P. Rowlinson, and S. Simic. 1997. Eigenspaces of graphs. Cambridge University Press.
[13]
P.S. Dodds, R. Muhamad, and D.J. Watts. 2003. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science 301, 5634 (2003), 827–829.
[14]
E. Estrada, N. Hatano, and M. Benzi. 2012. The physics of communicability in complex networks. Physics reports 514, 3 (2012), 89–119.
[15]
E. Estrada and J.A. Rodriguez-Velazquez. 2005. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Physical Review E 71, 5 (2005), 056103.
[16]
T. Fenner, M. Levene, and G. Loizou. 2008. Modelling the navigation potential of a Web page. Theoretical Computer Science 396, 1-3 (2008), 88–96.
[17]
S. Goel, R. Muhamad, and D.J. Watts. 2009. Social search in “Small-World”experiments. In Proc. of the International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2009). Madrid, Spain, 701–710.
[18]
D. Helic, M. Strohmaier, M. Granitzer, and R. Scherer. 2013. Models of human navigation in information networks based on decentralized search. In Proc. of the ACM conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM, Paris, France, 89–98.
[19]
N.J. Higham. 2008. Functions of matrices: theory and computation. Vol. 104. SIAM.
[20]
R. Horn and C. Johnson. 2013. Matrix analysis (2ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press.
[21]
H. Jeong, B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z. Oltvai, and A. Barabasi. 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 6804 (2000), 651.
[22]
L. Katz. 1953. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18, 1 (1953), 39–43.
[23]
J. Kleinberg. 2000. The small-world phenomenon: An algorithmic perspective. In Proc. of the ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC 2000). ACM, 163–170.
[24]
E. Leicht, P. Holme, and M. Newman. 2006. Vertex similarity in networks. Physical Review E 73, 2 (2006), 026120.
[25]
J. Leskovec, L. Adamic, and B. Huberman. 2007. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web 1, 1 (2007), 5.
[26]
J. Leskovec and E. Horvitz. 2008. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proc. of the International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2008. Beijing, China, 915–924.
[27]
M. Levene and R. Wheeldon. 2004. Navigating the World Wide Web. In Web Dynamics, M. Levene and A. Poulovassilis (Eds.). Springer, 117–151.
[28]
L. Lü, D. Chen, X. Ren, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and T. Zhou. 2016. Vital nodes identification in complex networks. Physics Reports 650(2016), 1–63.
[29]
M. Newman. 2001. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, 2 (2001), 404–409.
[30]
M. Newman. 2010. Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press.
[31]
O. Simsek and D. Jensen. 2008. Navigating networks by using homophily and degree. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 35(2008), 12758–12762.
[32]
G. Strang. 1993. Introduction to linear algebra. Vol. 3. Wellesley-Cambridge Press Wellesley, MA.
[33]
J. Travers and S. Milgram. 1967. The small world problem. Phychology Today 1, 1 (1967), 61–67.
[34]
Sebastiano Vigna. 2016. Spectral ranking. Network Science 4, 4 (2016), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2016.21
[35]
D. Watts and S. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393, 6684 (1998), 440.
[36]
R. West and J. Leskovec. 2012. Automatic Versus Human Navigation in Information Networks. In Proc. of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, (ISWMC 2012). Dublin, Ireland.
[37]
R. West, J. Pineau, and D. Precup. 2009. Wikispeedia: An Online Game for Inferring Semantic Distances between Concepts. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009). Pasadena, California, USA, 1598–1603.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Branching processes reveal influential nodes in social networksInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2023.119201644:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2020)Efficient Algorithm for the Identification of Node Significance in Complex NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29721078(28947-28955)Online publication date: 2020

Index Terms

  1. Potential gain as a centrality measure
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WI '19: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence
    October 2019
    507 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Centrality
    2. Graph Navigability
    3. Node Ranking in Graphs

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    WI '19

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 178 submissions, 66%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Branching processes reveal influential nodes in social networksInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2023.119201644:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
    • (2020)Efficient Algorithm for the Identification of Node Significance in Complex NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29721078(28947-28955)Online publication date: 2020

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media