Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3349611.3355549acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

I See What you See: Real Time Prediction of Video Quality from Encrypted Streaming Traffic

Published: 04 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

We address the problem of real-time QoE monitoring of HAS, from the ISP perspective, focusing in particular on video-resolution analysis. Given the wide adoption of end-to-end encryption, we resort to machine-learning models to predict different video resolution levels in a fine-grained scale, ranging from 144p to 1080p resolution, using as input only packet-level data. The proposed measurement system performs predictions in real time, during the course of an ongoing video-streaming session, with a time granularity as small as one second. We consider the particular case of YouTube video streaming. Empirical evaluations on a large and heterogeneous corpus of YouTube measurements demonstrate that the proposed system can predict video resolution with very high accuracy, and in real time. Different from state of the art, the prediction task is not bound to coarse-grained video quality classes and does not require chunk-detection approaches for feature extraction.

References

[1]
P. Casas et al., “YOUQMON: A System for On-line Monitoring of YouTube QoE in Operational 3G Networks”. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 41(2), 2013.
[2]
G. Dimopoulos et al., “Measuring Video QoE from Encrypted Traffic”. In ACM IMC Conference, 2016.
[3]
S. Egger et al., “Waiting Times in Quality of Experience for Web Based Services”. In QoMEX Conference, 2012.
[4]
P. Geurts et al., “Extremely Randomized Trees”. Machine Learning 63(1), 2006.
[5]
C. Gutterman et al., “Requet: Real-time QoE Detection for Encrypted YouTube Traffic”. In ACM MMSys Conference, 2019.
[6]
T. Hoßfeld et al., “Assessing Effect Sizes of Influence Factors Towards a QoE Model for HTTP Adaptive Streaming”. In QoMEX Conference, 2014.
[7]
T. Karagkioules et al., “A Public Dataset for YouTube's Mobile Streaming Client”. In TMA/MNM Workshop, 2018.
[8]
V. Krishnamoorthi et al., “BUFFEST: Predicting Buffer Conditions and Realtime Requirements of HTTP(S) Adaptive Streaming Clients”. In ACM MMSys Conference, 2017.
[9]
B. Lewcio et al., “Video Quality in Next Generation Mobile Networks - Perception of Time-varying Transmission”. In IEEE CQR Workshop, 2011.
[10]
T. Mangla et al., “eMIMIC: Estimating HTTP-based Video QoE Metrics from Encrypted Network Traffic”. In TMA Conference, 2018.
[11]
M. H. Mazhar et al., “Real-time Video Quality of Experience Monitoring for HTTPS and QUIC”. In IEEE INFOCOM Conference, 2018.
[12]
P. Ni et al., “Flicker Effects in Adaptive Video Streaming to Handheld Devices”. In ACM MM Conference, 2011.
[13]
I. Orsolic et al., “YouTube QoE Estimation Based on the Analysis of Encrypted Network Traffic Using Machine Learning”. In QoEMC Workshop, 2016.
[14]
R. Schatz et al., “Passive YouTube QoE Monitoring for ISPs”. In FINGNet Workshop, 2012.
[15]
M. Seufert et al., “A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 17(1), 2015.
[16]
S. Wassermann et al., “Machine Learning Models for YouTube QoE and User Engagement Prediction in Smartphones”. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 46(3), 2019.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Improving the Transfer of Machine Learning-Based Video QoE Estimation Across Diverse NetworksIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2023.332666421:3(2824-2836)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2023)A feature selection for video quality of experience modeling: A systematic literature reviewWIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1002/widm.149713:3Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Resolution Identification of Encrypted Video Streaming Based on HTTP/2 FeaturesACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/355189119:2(1-23)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
Internet-QoE'19: Proceedings of the 4th Internet-QoE Workshop on QoE-based Analysis and Management of Data Communication Networks
October 2019
50 pages
ISBN:9781450369275
DOI:10.1145/3349611
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. encrypted traffic
  2. http adaptive video streaming
  3. network monitoring
  4. qoe

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MobiCom '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 10 of 21 submissions, 48%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Improving the Transfer of Machine Learning-Based Video QoE Estimation Across Diverse NetworksIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2023.332666421:3(2824-2836)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2023)A feature selection for video quality of experience modeling: A systematic literature reviewWIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1002/widm.149713:3Online publication date: 3-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Resolution Identification of Encrypted Video Streaming Based on HTTP/2 FeaturesACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/355189119:2(1-23)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2022
  • (2021)A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques for Video Quality Prediction from Quality of Delivery MetricsElectronics10.3390/electronics1022285110:22(2851)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Characterizing the Relationship Between Application QoE and Network QoS for Real-Time ServicesProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Workshop on Network-Application Integration10.1145/3472727.3472800(20-25)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2021
  • (2021)SETA++: Real-Time Scalable Encrypted Traffic Analytics in Multi-Gbps NetworksIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2021.308509718:3(3244-3259)Online publication date: Sep-2021
  • (2021)AI in 5G Networks: Challenges and Use CasesCommunication Networks and Service Management in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning10.1002/9781119675525.ch5(101-122)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2021
  • (2020)RequetACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications10.1145/339449816:2s(1-28)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2020
  • (2020)ViCrypt to the Rescue: Real-Time, Machine-Learning-Driven Video-QoE Monitoring for Encrypted Streaming TrafficIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2020.303649717:4(2007-2023)Online publication date: Dec-2020
  • (2020)Accuracy vs. Cost Trade-off for Machine Learning Based QoE Estimation in 5G NetworksICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9148685(1-6)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media