Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3341525.3387422acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

CS in Schools: Developing a sustainable Coding Programme in Australian Schools

Published: 15 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Digital technology is compulsory in schools in most states at most year levels in Australia. However, a recent survey of over 400 Australian schools in 2019 found that 96% have had difficulty hiring qualified technology teachers and 39% of schools have reduced the amount of technology education they offer. We have observed that there is a shortage of teachers who feel qualified to teach coding. To address this problem, we launched CS in Schools (see https://csinschools.com), a successful in-class professional development programme for teachers that helps schools build a robust digital technology capability in their students. Our programme matches pedagogy with content expertise, by matching a volunteer computing professional with a secondary school teacher, and helping that teacher develop their coding skills in the classroom over a six month period. This experience paper describes the approach we took in piloting our programme with 10 teachers in~8 schools who taught over 1,100 students in 2019. We also describe our current scale-up in 2020 to work with around 60 teachers, around 40 volunteers, over 25 schools, and more than 6,000 students. Our goal is to work with hundreds of schools in 2021.

References

[1]
Rodger W. Bybee, Joseph A Taylor, April Gardner, Pamela Van Scotter, J. Carlson Powell, Anne Westbrook, and Nancy Landes. 2006. The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS 5 (2006), 88--98.
[2]
Design and Technology Teachers' Association of Australia. 2019. Technologies Teacher Shortage Survey: National Overview 2019. https://www.dattaaustralia.com/technologiesteachershortage.
[3]
Laura M Desimone, Andrew C Porter, Michael S Garet, Kwang Suk Yoon, and Beatrice F Birman. 2002. Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational evaluation and policy analysis 24, 2 (2002), 81--112.
[4]
Deloitte Access Economics. 2019. ACS Australia's Digital Pulse 2019| Booming today, but how can we sustain digital workforce growth? https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/australias-digital-pulse.html.
[5]
Dan Garcia, Brian Harvey, and Tiffany Barnes. 2015. The beauty and joy of computing. ACM Inroads6, 4 (2015), 71--79.
[6]
Joanna Goode. 2007. If You Build Teachers, Will Students Come?The Role of Teachers in Broadening Computer Science Learning for Urban Youth. Journal of Educational Computing Research 36, 1 (2007), 65--88.
[7]
Nathaniel Granor, Leigh Ann DeLyser, and Kevin Wang. 2016. TEALS: Teacher professional development using industry volunteers. In Proceedings of the 47thACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, 60--65.
[8]
Thomas R Guskey and Michael Huberman. 1995. Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices. ERIC.
[9]
Mark Guzdial and Elliot Soloway. 2002. Teaching the Nintendo generation to program. Commun. ACM 45 (04 2002), 17--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/505248.505261
[10]
V. Darleen Opfer and David Pedder. 2011. The lost promise of teacher professional development in England. European Journal of Teacher Education 34, 1(2011), 3--24.
[11]
Anthony Papini, Leigh Ann DeLyser, Nathaniel Granor, and Kevin Wang. 2017.Preparing and Supporting Industry Professionals as Volunteer High School Computer Science Co-instructors. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 441--446.
[12]
Alexander Repenning. 2018. Scale or Fail. Commun. ACM 61, 5 (April 2018), 40--42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3199603
[13]
David C. Webb, Alexander Repenning, and Kyu Han Koh. 2012. Toward an Emergent Theory of Broadening Participation in Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA,173--178. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157191
[14]
Paul R. Weldon. 2015. The Teacher Workforce in Australia: Supply, Demand and Data Issues. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Introducing Computational Thinking at Vocational High SchoolsProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588818(68-74)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Classifying the Characteristics of Effective Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for Computer Science Teachers in the 16-18 SectorACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/358227523:2(1-30)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
  • (2022)Computer Science in Schools: A Literature Mapping of Professional Development for In-Service Teachers2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766599(164-173)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. CS in Schools: Developing a sustainable Coding Programme in Australian Schools

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
    June 2020
    615 pages
    ISBN:9781450368742
    DOI:10.1145/3341525
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 June 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. K-12 education
    2. broadening participation
    3. teacher professional development

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ITiCSE '20
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)105
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Introducing Computational Thinking at Vocational High SchoolsProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588818(68-74)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Classifying the Characteristics of Effective Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for Computer Science Teachers in the 16-18 SectorACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/358227523:2(1-30)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
    • (2022)Computer Science in Schools: A Literature Mapping of Professional Development for In-Service Teachers2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766599(164-173)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2022
    • (2021)Programming for Children and Teenagers in BrazilProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432554(411-417)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
    • (2021)Changing Teacher Perceptions about Computational Thinking in Grades 1-6, through a National Training ProgramProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432542(260-266)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media