Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3341525.3387412acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a Holistic Reservoir of Research-Based PCK Segments of K-12 Computer Science Teachers

Published: 15 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Computer science education (CSE) at the K-12 level is becoming increasingly more prevalent. Consequently, there is an urgent need for competent CS teachers; hence, also for effective training programs. The pedagogical content knowledge of CS teachers (CS-PCK) plays an important role in teachers' training. To effectively incorporate CS-PCK into teachers' training, a CS-PCK resource, which relies on the "wisdom of practice" of experienced teachers as well as the body of research on CS education would be of great value. Such a resource should consist of reliable, coherent, and self-contained CS-PCK segments, which can be used in relevant contexts with little processing and adaptation. Such a resource can also serve in-service teachers, developers of teaching materials, as well as others dealing with K-12 CS education. Constructing such a reservoir requires: 1) an effective procedure for obtaining reliable CS-PCK segments, and 2) a method for organizing CS-PCK segments that reflects their content and attributes. Herein we describe one part of a large research project on CS-PCK. In a previous publication, we reported on a method for extracting research-based CS-PCK segments from experienced teachers and established its effectiveness, thus satisfying the first requirement. The current paper concerns the second requirement. We will describe and demonstrate our innovative method for devising an incremental structure that can contain CS-PCK segments, obtained from either experienced teachers or from the CS education research literature.

References

[1]
Michal Armoni. 2011. Looking at secondary teacher preparation through the lens of computer science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11, 4, Article 23, 38 pages.
[2]
Elena Bender, Peter Hubwieser, Niclas Schaper, Melanie Margaritis, Marc Berges, Laura Ohrndorf, Johannes Magenheim, and Sigrid Schubert. 2015. Towards a competency model for teaching computer scienc. Journal of Education, 90, 4, 519--532.
[3]
Ofra Brandes, and Michal Armoni. 2019. Using action research to distill research-based segments of pedagogical content knowledge of K-12 computer science teachers. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 485--491.
[4]
Malte Buchholz, Mara Saeli, and Carsten Schulte. 2013. PCK and reflection in computer science teacher education. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 8--16.
[5]
Linda Darling-Hammond, Ruth Chung Wei, Alethea Andree, Nikole, Richardson, and Stelios Orphanos. 2009. Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad. National Staff Development Council.
[6]
Esther M. van Dijk. 2009. Teachers' views on understanding evolutionary theory: A PCK-study in the framework of the ERTE-model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 259--267.
[7]
Esther M. van Dijk, and Ulrich Kattmann. 2007. A research model for the study of science teachers' PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 885--897.
[8]
Judith Gal-Ezer, and David Harel. 1999. Curriculum and course syllabi for a high-school CS program. Computer Science Education, Vol. 9, 2, 114--147.
[9]
Judith Gal-Ezer, and Ela Zur. 2004. The efficiency of algorithms - misconceptions. Computers and Education, 42, 3, 215--226.
[10]
Andoni Garritz, Clara Alvarado, Florentina Cañada, and Vicente Mellado. 2013. PCK by CoRes and PaP-eRs for teaching acids and bases at high school. In Proceedings of the NARST-2013 Conference, 1--49.
[11]
Pamela L. Grossman. 1990. The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA and Teachers College Press, London, UK.
[12]
Bruria Haberman, Ela Lev, and Dorothy Langley. 2003. Action research as a tool for promoting teacher awareness of students' conceptual understanding. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35, 3, 144--148?.
[13]
John A.C. Hattie. 2003. Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? In Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us, Proceedings of the Australian Council for Educational Research, 1--17.
[14]
David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer. 1992. Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, Vol. 30, 141--158.
[15]
Kenneth, R. Howey, and Pamela L. Grossman. 1989. A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 5, 24--31
[16]
Aleata Hubbard. 2018. Pedagogical content knowledge in computing education: a review of the research literature. Computer Science Education, 28, 2, 117--135.
[17]
Peter Hubwieser, Johannes Magenheim, Andreas Mühling, and Alexander Ruf. 2013. Towards a conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge for computer science. In Proceedings of the 9th International Computing Education Research Conference, 1--8.
[18]
Joseph Keating, Rosario Diaz-Greenberg, Mark Baldwin, and Jacqueline Thousand. 1998. A collaborative action research model for teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Educion, 49, 5, 381--390.
[19]
Herman Koppelman. 2008. Pedagogical content knowledge and educational cases in computer science: an exploration. In Proceedings of the Informing Science & IT Education Conference, 125--133.
[20]
Klaus Krippendorff. 2004. Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38, 6, 787--800.
[21]
Dan Leyzberg, and Christopher Moretti. 2017. Teaching CS to CS teachers: Addressing the need for advanced content in K-12 professional development. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 369--374.
[22]
John Loughran, Pamela Mulhall, and Amanda Berry. 2004. In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Sience Teaching, 41, 4, 370--391.
[23]
Shirley Magnusson, Joseph Krajcik, and Hilda Borko. 1999. Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Julie Gess-Newsom, and Norman G. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and Science Education. 95--132. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
[24]
Lauren Margulieux, Tuba A. Ketenci, and Adrienne Decker. 2019. Review of measurements used in computing education research and suggestions for increasing standardization. Computer Science Education, 29, 1, 49--78.
[25]
Pillipp Mayring. 2004. Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, 1?, 159--176.
[26]
Monica M. McGill, and Adrienne Decker. 2018. Defining requirements for a repository to meet the needs of K-12 computer science educators, researchers, and evaluators. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1--9.
[27]
Jacob Perrenet, Jan Friso Groote, and Eric Kaasenbrood. 2005. Exploring students' understanding of the concept of algorithm: levels of abstraction?. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37, 3?, 64--68.
[28]
Mara Saeli. 2012. Teaching Programming for Secondary School: a Pedagogical Content Knowledge Based Approach. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
[29]
Mara Saeli, Jacob Perrenet, Wim M. G. Jochem, and Bert Zwaneveld. 2011. Teaching programming in secondary school: a pedagogical content knowledge perspective. Informatics in Education, 10, 1, 73--88.
[30]
Lee S. Shulman. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 2, 4--14.
[31]
Lee S. Shulman. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1, 1--21.
[32]
Lee S. Shulman. 2002. Truth and consequences? Inquiry and policy in research on teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 3, 248--253.
[33]
Lee S. Shulman. 2007. Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36, 9, 560--563.
[34]
Dina Tirosh, and Ruth Stavy. 1999. Intuitive rules: A way to explain and predict students' reasoning. In Forms of Mathematical Knowledge?, 51--66. Springer, Dordrecht.
[35]
Aman Yadav, and Marc Berges. 2019. Computer science pedagogical content knowledge: Characterizing teacher performance. Transactions On Computer Science Education, 19, 3, Article 29, 24 pages.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A study on students' views toward K-12 computer science teaching careerProceedings of the 2021 ACM Southeast Conference10.1145/3409334.3452075(190-193)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
June 2020
615 pages
ISBN:9781450368742
DOI:10.1145/3341525
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CS-PCK
  2. K-12
  3. PCK
  4. repository
  5. teachers

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 27 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)A study on students' views toward K-12 computer science teaching careerProceedings of the 2021 ACM Southeast Conference10.1145/3409334.3452075(190-193)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media