Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3239060.3239079acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where Autonomous Buses Might and Might Not Bridge the Gaps in the 4 A's of Public Transport Passenger Needs: a Review

Published: 23 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In the domain of public transport, automation provides several advantages which can lead to better services for the customers. For tapping the full potential of future automated public transport services, passenger requirements have to be thoroughly considered in order to avoid shortcomings discouraging future users to remain or become customers and to support the role of public transit as sustainable backbone of transport.
This paper assesses the potential of autonomous bus services with respect to four categories of passenger requirements described as the "4 A's of Public Transport Passenger Needs": availability, affordability, accessibility, and acceptability. Based on a review of currently discussed scenarios of automation, benefits and risks regarding the specific needs of different passenger groups are explored for these four categories. Finally, open issues which require special attention or further research are identified.

References

[1]
I. Borges. 2012. The added value of accessible public transport for all in the context of demographic ageing. AGE Presentation at XXIII World Road Congress, Paris, France. August 21, 2012.
[2]
ERTRAC, 2017. Automated Driving Roadmap, Available at: http://www.ertrac.org/uploads/images/ERTRAC_Automated_Driving_2017.pdf.
[3]
P. Fröhlich, A. Millonig, L. Diamond, M. Gruber, Ch. Zinner, W. Ponweiser, K. Schwieger, S. Seer, M. Tscheligi. 2017. Reading the Mind of a Bus: Challenges for Transparent Interaction with Automated Vehicles. 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2017), Vienna, Austria. September 4-7, 2017, 4 p.
[4]
GOAL. 2012. Older People and Public Transport. Deliverable 4.1, GOAL project from http://www.goal-project.eu/.
[5]
K. Markvica, N. Haufe, A. Millonig. 2016. Using Milieu-Based Communication Strategies For Changing Mobility Behaviour Towards Low Energy Modes. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Behaviour and Energy Efficiency, M.A.R. Lopes, Antunes C. Henggeler, Martins A. Gomes, L. Silva (eds.), (Behave 2016). INESC Coimbra & ADENE, Coimbra, Portugal.
[6]
pteg - Passenger Transport Executives Group. 2010. Transport and Social Inclusion: Have we made the connections in our cities? pteg, Wellington House, Leeds, May 2010.
[7]
K. Rehrl and C. Zankl, 2018, Digibus: Results from the first Self-Driving Shuttle Trial on a Public Road in Austria. In: Proceedings of 7th Transport Research Arena TRA 2018, April 16-19, 2018, Vienna, Austria.
[8]
C. Rohr, L. Ecola, J. Zmud, F. Dunkerley, J. Black, E. Baker. 2016. Travel in Britain in 2035: Future scenarios and their implications for technology innovation. In Innovate UK from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1377.html.
[9]
B. Shrestha, A. Millonig, N. Hounsell, M. McDonald. 2017. Review of Public Transport Needs of Older People in European Context. In Journal of Population Ageing (2017) 10: 343.
[10]
SOHJOA, 2016. SOHJOA Robot Bus Project. Available at: http://sohjoa.fi/.
[11]
TPF, 2017. The very first automated public passenger transportation service. Available at: http://www.tpf.ch/en/-/une-navette-automatisee-pour-desservir-le-marly-innovation-center.
[12]
Trapeze, 2017. Verkehrsbetriebe Schaffhausen fahren autonom. Available at: http://www.trapezegroup.de/news/verkehrsbetriebe-schaffhausen-fahren-autonom.
[13]
S. Trommer, V. Kolarova, E. Frädrich et al. 2016. Autonomous driving - The impact of vehicle automation on mobility behavior. From https://www.ifmo.de/publications.html?t=45.
[14]
J. Urry. 2016. What is the future. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, Malden, MA.
[15]
F. Vallet, J. Puchinger, A. Millonig. 2018. Utiliser des personas pour raconter la mobilité en 2030. At Conférence "lères Rencontres Francophones Transport Mobilité (RFTM)", 6-8 Jun 2018, Lyon, France.
[16]
M. van Hagen, A. Pruyn, M. Galetzka and J. Kramer. 2009. Waiting is Becoming Fun! The Influence of Advertising and Infotainment on the Waiting Experience. In Proceedings of the European Transport Congress, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, Oct. 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)`Baymax' or `RoboCop'? Exploring Different Feminine Avatar Personalities for Shared Automated VehiclesProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3670682(256-268)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Customized HMI as a Key to increased Acceptance? Implications of an Online Survey assessing Relationships of Experience, Trust and Information InterestAdjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3685034(117-122)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Robots in autonomous buses: Who hosts when no human is there?Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3641115(1278-1280)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Where Autonomous Buses Might and Might Not Bridge the Gaps in the 4 A's of Public Transport Passenger Needs: a Review

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AutomotiveUI '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      September 2018
      374 pages
      ISBN:9781450359467
      DOI:10.1145/3239060
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 23 September 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Automation
      2. autonomous buses
      3. passenger needs
      4. public transport

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      AutomotiveUI '18
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)83
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)`Baymax' or `RoboCop'? Exploring Different Feminine Avatar Personalities for Shared Automated VehiclesProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202410.1145/3670653.3670682(256-268)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Customized HMI as a Key to increased Acceptance? Implications of an Online Survey assessing Relationships of Experience, Trust and Information InterestAdjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3685034(117-122)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Robots in autonomous buses: Who hosts when no human is there?Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3641115(1278-1280)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Human or robot? Exploring different avatar appearances to increase perceived security in shared automated vehiclesJournal on Multimodal User Interfaces10.1007/s12193-024-00436-xOnline publication date: 30-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Unlocking the Full Spectrum of User Perspectives on Automated Mobility Using the ‘Supertesters’ MethodShared Mobility Revolution10.1007/978-3-031-71793-2_8(121-141)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2024
      • (2023)Perceived Opportunities and Challenges of Autonomous Demand-Responsive Transit Use: What Are the Socio-Demographic Predictors?Sustainability10.3390/su15151183915:15(11839)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
      • (2023)Fifty shades of frustration: Intra- and interindividual variances in expressing frustrationTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.00494(436-452)Online publication date: Apr-2023
      • (2023)Explore public acceptance of autonomous buses: An integrated model of UTAUT, TTF and trustTravel Behaviour and Society10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.01031(120-130)Online publication date: Apr-2023
      • (2023)Sustainable Urban MobilityHandbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_418-1(1-23)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2023
      • (2022)INEQUALITY OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES IN LITHUANIAN MUNICIPALITIESMokslas - Lietuvos ateitis10.3846/mla.2022.1718014(1-9)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media