Teaching projects and research objectives in SPL extraction
Pages 44 - 45
Abstract
This year at SPLC we present a teaching and research project where a group of master students analysed a variability-rich domain and extracted an SPL (The Robocode SPL). We present the results of such extraction augmented with an analysis and a quantification regarding the time and effort spent. The research objective was to get and share data about an end-to-end SPL extraction which is usually unavailable in industrial cases because of their large size, complexity, and duration. We provide all the material to replicate, reproduce or extend the case study so it can be easily reused for teaching by anyone in our community. However, we were asking ourselves how can we leverage such case study for teaching to pursue research objectives. In this position paper, we aim to outline our initial ideas that we want to enrich with the others' viewpoints during SPLTea. Towards planning the settings of future teaching projects around this Robocode SPL case study, which can be the timely research objectives that we can identify? Can we involve others in planning this project in their institutions to get further relevant results?
References
[1]
Sven Apel, Christian Kästner, and Christian Lengauer. 2009. FEATUREHOUSE: Language-independent, automated software composition. In 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2009, May 16--24, 2009, Vancouver, Canada, Proceedings. IEEE, 221--231.
[2]
Ken Hartness. 2004. Robocode: using games to teach artificial intelligence. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 19, 4 (2004), 287--291.
[3]
Jabier Martinez, Xhevahire Tërnava, and Tewfik Ziadi. 2018. Software Product Line Extraction from Variability-Rich Systems: The Robocode Case Study. In SPLC 2018. ACM.
[4]
Jackie O'Kelly and J. Paul Gibson. 2006. RoboCode & problem-based learning: a non-prescriptive approach to teaching programming. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2006, Bologna, Italy, June 26--28, 2006, Renzo Davoli, Michael Goldweber, and Paola Salomoni (Eds.). ACM, 217--221.
[5]
Martin Shepperd. 2018. Replication studies considered harmful. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results. ACM, 73--76.
[6]
Yehonatan Shichel, Eran Ziserman, and Moshe Sipper. 2005. GP-Robocode: Using Genetic Programming to Evolve Robocode Players. In Genetic Programming, 8th European Conference, EuroGP2005, Lausanne, Switzerland, March 30 - April 1, 2005, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 3447. Springer, 143--154.
[7]
Thomas Thüm, Christian Kästner, Fabian Benduhn, Jens Meinicke, Gunter Saake, and Thomas Leich. 2014. FeatureIDE: an extensible framework for feature-oriented software development. 79, 0 (2014), 70--85.
Index Terms
- Teaching projects and research objectives in SPL extraction
Recommendations
Software product line extraction from variability-rich systems: the robocode case study
SPLC '18: Proceedings of the 22nd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume 1The engineering of a Software Product Line (SPL), either by creating it from scratch or through the re-engineering of existing variants, it uses to be a project that spans several years with a high investment. It is often hard to analyse and quantify ...
Feature location benchmark with argoUML SPL
SPLC '18: Proceedings of the 22nd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume 1Feature location is a traceability recovery activity to identify the implementation elements associated to a characteristic of a system. Besides its relevance for software maintenance of a single system, feature location in a collection of systems ...
Fourth International Workshop on Software Product Line Teaching (SPLTea 2019)
SPLC '19: Proceedings of the 23rd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume AEducation has a key role to play for disseminating the constantly growing body of Software Product Line (SPL) knowledge. In a sense, every researcher in SPL should think about how to teach SPL. This workshop aims to explore and explain the current ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2018
101 pages
ISBN:9781450359450
DOI:10.1145/3236405
Copyright © 2018 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 10 September 2018
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Conference
SPLC '18
SPLC '18: 22nd International Systems and Software Product Line Conference
September 10 - 14, 2018
Gothenburg, Sweden
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 167 of 463 submissions, 36%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 56Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in