Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3209978.3210204acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Auto-completion for Question Answering Systems at Bloomberg

Published: 27 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The Bloomberg Terminal is the leading source of information and news in the finance industry. Through hundreds of functions that provide access to a vast wealth of structured and semi-structured data, the terminal is able to satisfy a wide range of information needs. Users can find what they need by constructing queries, plotting charts, creating alerts, and so on. Until recently, most queries to the terminal were constructed through dedicated GUIs. For instance, if users wanted to screen for technology companies that met certain criteria, they would specify the criteria by filling out a form via a sequence of interactions with GUI elements such as drop-down lists, checkboxes, radio and toggle buttons, etc. To facilitate information retrieval in the terminal, we are equipping it with the ability to understand and answer queries expressed in natural language. Our QA (question answering) systems map structurally complex questions like the above to a logical meaning representation which can then be translated to an executable query language (such as SQL or SPARQL). At that point we can execute the queries against a suitable back end, obtain the results, and present them to the users. Adding a natural-language interface to a data repository introduces usability challenges of its own, chief amongst them being this: How can the user know what the system can and cannot understand and answer (without needing to undergo extensive training)? We can unpack this question into two separate parts: 1) How can we convey the full range of the system's abilities? 2) How can we convey its limitations? We use auto-complete as a tool to help meet both challenges. Specifically, the first question pertains to the general issue of discoverability: We want at least some of the suggested completions to act as vehicles for discovering data and functionality of which users may have not been previously aware. The second question pertains to expectation management. Naturally, no QA system can attain perfect performance; limiting factors include representational shortcomings and various kinds of incompleteness of the underlying data sources, as well as NLP technology limitations. We want to stop generating completions as a signal indicating that we are not able to understand and/or answer what is being typed.

References

[1]
Hannah Bast and Elmar Haussmann . 2015. More accurate question answering on Freebase. In CIKM 2015. 299--304.
[2]
H. Bast and Ingmar Weber . 2006. Type less, find more: fast autocompletion search with a succinct index SIGIR 2006. 364--371.
[3]
Sumit Bhatia, Debapriyo Majumdar, and Prasenjit Mitra . 2011. Query suggestions in the absence of query logs. In SIGIR 2011. 795--804.
[4]
Fei Cai and Maarten de Rijke . 2016. A survey of query auto completion in information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval Vol. 10, 4 (2016), 273--363.
[5]
Mandar Joshi, Uma Sawant, and Soumen Chakrabarti . 2014. Knowledge graph and corpus driven segmentation and answer inference for telegraphic entity-seeking queries. In EMNLP 2014. 1104--1114.
[6]
Bhaskar Mitra and Nick Craswell . 2015. Query auto-completion for rare prefixes. In CIKM 2015. 1755--1758.
[7]
Bhaskar Mitra, Milad Shokouhi, Filip Radlinski, and Katja Hofmann . 2014. On user interactions with query auto-completion. In SIGIR 2014. 1055--1058.
[8]
Denis Savenkov and Eugene Agichtein . 2017. EviNets: Neural networks for combining evidence signals for factoid question answering ACL 2017, Volume 2: Short Papers. 299--304.
[9]
Milad Shokouhi . 2013. Learning to personalize query auto-completion. In SIGIR 2013. 103--112.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Efficient Arabic Query Auto-Completion for Question Answering at a University2022 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)10.1109/ACIT57182.2022.9994190(1-9)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR '18: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval
June 2018
1509 pages
ISBN:9781450356572
DOI:10.1145/3209978
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. auto-complete
  2. auto-completion
  3. question answering

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

SIGIR '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 86 of 409 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Efficient Arabic Query Auto-Completion for Question Answering at a University2022 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)10.1109/ACIT57182.2022.9994190(1-9)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2022

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media