Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3209281.3209283acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Towards the open government ecosystem: open government based on artificial intelligence for the development of public policies

Published: 30 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

This article presents the results of the analysis of the open government initiative in the city of SÃo Paulo. The theoretical-methodological structure built in the doctoral research promoted the evolution of the debate about openness through the debate of the ecosystem of open government with multiple actors. In addition, the results indicate the need for the evolution of open government strategies to an ecosystem capable of integrating multiple parties in the development of public policies, for this, it is necessary to invest in "collaborative data" between civil society, private organizations and the government sector. The new support for decision-making and evidence is reinforced by political algorithm and artificial intelligence devices as software. In addition, we have awakened to the need for an emerging framework of regulation, ethics, inclusion, transparency and open governance for "political algorithms."

References

[1]
Macintosh, Ann; Whyte, A. 2008. Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 2, N. 1, p. 16--30.
[2]
Clarke, A. & Francoli, M. 2014. What's in a Name? A Comparison of 'Open Government' Definitions across Seven Open Government Partnership Members. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 6 (1): 248--266.
[3]
Cruz-Rubio, C. N. (2015). What is (and what is not) Open government? A conceptual discussion. Eunomía. Journal in culture of Legality No. 8, March -- August 2015, p. 37--53.
[4]
Chatwin, M.; Godwin, A. 2017. Beyond Ambiguity: Conceptualizing Open Government through a Human Systems Framework. JeDEM 9(1): 52--78.
[5]
Wirtz, Bernd & Birkmeyer, Steven. (2015). Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration. 38. 1--16.
[6]
Harrison, T.M., Pardo, T.A., Cook, M. 2012. Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda. Future Internet 4, 4, 900--928.
[7]
Zuiderwijk, Anneke et al. 2014. Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data: Guest Editors' Introduction. J. THEOR. APPL. ELECTRON. COMMER. RES., ALCA, v. 9, n. 2, p. i--xiii, Mayo.
[8]
Najafabadi, Mahdi & Luna-Reyes, Luis. 2017. Open Government Data Ecosystems: A Closed-Loop Perspective. 10.24251/HICSS.2017.327.
[9]
Just, N. & Latzer, M. 2016. Governance by Algorithms: Reality Construction by Algorithmic Selection on the Internet. Accepted manuscript forthcoming in Media, Culture & Society.
[10]
Luna-Reyes, Luis & Picazo-Vela, Sergio & LUNA, Dolores & GIL-GARCIA, J. Ramon. 2016. Creating Public Value through Digital Government: Lessons on Inter-Organizational Collaboration and Information Technologies. 2840--2849.
[11]
Hancock, Matt. 2015. Artificial intelligence: opportunities and implications for the future of decision making. Governemnt Office for Science. UK.
[12]
Susha, Iryna & Janssen, Marijn & Verhulst, Stefaan. 2017. Data Collaboratives as a New Frontier of Cross-Sector Partnerships in the Age of Open Data: Taxonomy Development. HICSS.2017.325.
[13]
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M. & Davis, C. 2014. Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems. In: Information Polity. 19, 1-2, p. 17--3317 p.
[14]
Jones, Peter. 2017. The futures of Canadian governance: Foresight competencies for public administration in the digital era: THE FUTURES OF CANADIAN GOVERNANCE. Canadian Public Administration. 60. 657--681.
[15]
Clarke, A., Lindquist, E., Roy, J. 2017. Understanding governance in the digital era: An agenda for public administration research in Canada. Canadian Public Administration 60(4):457--475.
[16]
Gascó, Mila & G. Martin, E & Reggi, Luigi & Pyo, S & Luna-Reyes, Luis. 2017. Citizen Co-production through Open Data: Cases of Citizen Training and Engagement. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. 562--563.
[17]
Verhulst, Stefaan. 2017. How the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Collective Intelligence Could Enhance Their Impact on Society. Blog. The Medium Blog.
[18]
Burns, R., Dalton, C., M. & Thatcher, J., E. 2017: Critical Data, Critical Technology in Theory and Practice, The Professional Geographer.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Human-centered artificial intelligence for the public sector: The gate keeping role of the public procurement professionalProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.308200(1084-1092)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Examining How GDPR Challenges Emerging TechnologiesJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.023710(237-275)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
  • (2020)Examining How GDPR Challenges Emerging TechnologiesJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.1.023710:1(237-275)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
May 2018
889 pages
ISBN:9781450365260
DOI:10.1145/3209281
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 May 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. open government
  2. open government ecosystem
  3. participation
  4. public policy

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

dg.o '18

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Human-centered artificial intelligence for the public sector: The gate keeping role of the public procurement professionalProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.308200(1084-1092)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2020)Examining How GDPR Challenges Emerging TechnologiesJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.2020.023710(237-275)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
  • (2020)Examining How GDPR Challenges Emerging TechnologiesJournal of Information Policy10.5325/jinfopoli.10.1.023710:1(237-275)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
  • (2018)Analysis of standard vocabulary use of the open government data: the case of the public data portal of KoreaQuality & Quantity10.1007/s11135-018-0829-zOnline publication date: 14-Dec-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media