Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3206157.3206161acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Gender-Aware Gamified Scaffolding of Mathematics for the Middle School Level

Published: 09 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Coined the "leaky pipeline", young women entering college enroll significantly less in STEM majors than do their male peers. Researchers have attributed these leaks in part, to gender-influenced perceived competencies (self-efficacy) and pedagogical biases that lead to inadequate preparation for the requisite advanced mathematics in a wide range of STEM core subject areas. This paper presents our work in progress of a gamified scaffolding for mathematics. With grounding in constructionist theory, this approach targets young females at the 7th grade level by providing a pedagogical augmentation of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM).

References

[1]
Bunchball, I. 2010. Gamification 101: An introduction to the use of game dynamics to influence behavior. White paper, page 9.
[2]
Burger, W. F. and Shaughnessy, J. M. 1986. Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for research in mathematics education, 17(1): 31--48.
[3]
Cleary, T. J. and Chen, P. P. 2009. Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5):291--314.
[4]
Cobb, P. and Jackson, K. 2011. Assessing the quality of the common core state standards for mathematics. Educational Researcher, 40(4):183--185.
[5]
Core, C. 2010. Common core state standards initiative.
[6]
Czocher, J. A. 2013. Toward a description of how engineering students think mathematically. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.
[7]
Deterding, S. Dixon, D. Khaled, R. and Nacke, L. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, pages 9--15. ACM.
[8]
Dicheva, D. Dichev, C. Agre, G. and Angelova, G. 2015. Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3):75.
[9]
Dickhauser, O. and Meyer, W. 2006. Gender differences in young children's math ability attributions. Psychology Science, 48(1):3.
[10]
Dubinsky, E. and McDonald, M. A. 2001. Apos: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level, pages 275--282. Springer.
[11]
Fiske, S. T. Dasgupta, N. and Stout, J. G. 2014. Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Steming the tide and broadening participation in stem careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1):21--29.
[12]
Harp, L. 1993. Dollars and sense: Reformers seek to rethink school financing to make it a powerful lever of change. Education Week, March, 31:9--14.
[13]
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. Duncan, R. G. and Chinn, C. A. 2007. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2):99--107.
[14]
Inkpen, K. Upitis, R. Klawe, M. Lawry, J. Anderson, A. Ndunda, M. Sedighian, K. Leroux, S. and Hsu, D. 1994. We have never-forgetful flowers in our garden: Girls' responses to electronic games. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 13:383--383.
[15]
Jarosz, B. and Mather, M. June 2017. Losing ground: Young women's well-being across generations in the United States. Population Bulletin, 72(1).
[16]
Jumaat, N. F. and Tasir, Z. 2014. Instructional scaffolding in online learning environment: A meta-analysis. In Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), 2014 International Conference on, pages 74--77. IEEE.
[17]
Ke, F. 2008. A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51(4):1609--1620.
[18]
L'Allier, J. J. 1997. Frame of reference: NetG's map to the products, their structure and core beliefs. NetG. Recuperado de http://www. netg. com/research/whitepapers/frameref. asp.
[19]
Pea, R. D. 2004. The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3):423--451.
[20]
Perels, F. Dignath, C. and Schmitz, B. 2009. Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1):17--31.
[21]
Powell, S. R. Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. 2013. Reaching the mountaintop: Addressing the common core standards in mathematics for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1):38--48.
[22]
Renchler, R. S. et al. 1993. Poverty and learning.
[23]
Rieber, L. P. 1996. Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2):43--58.
[24]
Sadler, P. M. Sonnert, G. Hazari, Z. and Tai, R. 2012. Stability and volatility of stem career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3):411--427.
[25]
Vygotsky, L. 1978. Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3):34--41.
[26]
Wigfield, A. and Eccles, J. S. 2000. Expectancy--value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1):68--81.
[27]
Zichermann, G. and Cunningham, C. 2011. Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Using of divergent problems based on teacher scaffolding levels to grow of advanced mathematical thinking of senior high school studentsJournal of Physics: Conference Series10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/0220931567(022093)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2020

Index Terms

  1. A Gender-Aware Gamified Scaffolding of Mathematics for the Middle School Level

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICBDE '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Big Data and Education
    March 2018
    146 pages
    ISBN:9781450363587
    DOI:10.1145/3206157
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Florida: University of Florida

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 09 March 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Constructionist Theory
    2. Gamification
    3. Learning Objects

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICBDE '18

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Using of divergent problems based on teacher scaffolding levels to grow of advanced mathematical thinking of senior high school studentsJournal of Physics: Conference Series10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/0220931567(022093)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media