Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3205929.3205933acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

GaRSIVis: improving the predicting of self-interruption during reading using gaze data

Published: 15 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Gaze pattern data provides a promising opportunity to create a predictive model of self-interruption during reading that could support active interventions to keep a reader's attention at times when self-interruptions are predicted to occur. We present two systems designed to help analysts create and improve such a model. We present GaRSIVis, (Gaze Reading Self-Interruption Visualizer), that integrates a visualization front-end suitable for data cleansing and a prediction back-end that can be run repeatedly as the input data is iteratively improved. It allows analysts refining the predictive model to filter out unwanted parts of the gaze data that should not be used in the prediction. It relies on data gathered by GaRSILogger, which logs gaze data and activity associated with interruptions during on-screen reading. By integrating data cleansing and our prediction results in our visualization, we enable analysts using GaRSIVis to come up with a comprehensible way of understanding self-interruption from gaze related features.

References

[1]
Tanja Blascheck, Kuno Kurzhals, Michael Raschke, Michael Burch, Daniel Weiskopf, and Thomas Ertl. 2014. State-of-the-Art of Visualization for Eye Tracking Data. In EuroVis - STARs. The Eurographics Association. 20141173
[2]
Michael Bostock, Vadim Ogievetsky, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. D3 Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (Dec. 2011), 2301--2309.
[3]
Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 175--182. https: //
[4]
Victor M. González and Gloria Mark. 2004. "Constant, Constant, Multi-tasking Craziness": Managing Multiple Working Spheres. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 113--120.
[5]
Jaemin Jo, Bohyoung Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2015. EyeBookmark: Assisting Recovery from Interruption During Reading. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2963--2966.
[6]
Ioanna Katidioti, Jelmer P. Borst, Marieke K. van Vugt, and Niels A. Taatgen. 2016. Interrupt me: External interruptions are less disruptive than self-interruptions. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (Oct. 2016), 906--915.
[7]
Nilli Lavie. 2010. Attention, Distraction, and Cognitive Control Under Load. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19, 3 (2010), 143--148.
[8]
Mark Murphy. 2016. Interruptions At Work Are Killing Your Productivity. Forbes (Oct. 2016).
[9]
Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos, David Cournapeau, Matthieu Brucher, Matthieu Perrot, and Édouard Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (Nov. 2011), 2825--2830.
[10]
Bonita Sharif, Michael Falcone, and Jonathan I. Maletic. 2012. An Eye-tracking Study on the Role of Scan Time in Finding Source Code Defects. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 381--384.
[11]
Meng-Jung Tsai, Huei-Tse Hou, Meng-Lung Lai, Wan-Yi Liu, and Fang-Ying Yang. 2012. Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education 58, 1 (Jan. 2012), 375--385.
[12]
Hidetake Uwano, Masahide Nakamura, Akito Monden, and Ken-ichi Matsumoto. 2006. Analyzing Individual Performance of Source Code Review Using Reviewers' Eye Movement. In Proceedings of the 2006 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ETRA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133--140.
[13]
Qiuzhen Wang, Sa Yang, Manlu Liu, Zike Cao, and Qingguo Ma. 2014. An eye-tracking study of website complexity from cognitive load perspective. Decision Support Systems 62 (June 2014), 1--10.

Index Terms

  1. GaRSIVis: improving the predicting of self-interruption during reading using gaze data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ETVIS '18: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Eye Tracking and Visualization
    June 2018
    57 pages
    ISBN:9781450357876
    DOI:10.1145/3205929
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. eye tracking
    2. log visualization
    3. reading tasks
    4. self-interruption

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ETRA '18

    Upcoming Conference

    ETRA '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 328
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)50
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media