Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3291078.3291087acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Survey of Blended Learning for EGP Writing Supported by MOOCs and Juku

Published: 05 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The lack of English writing practices and efficient feedback, the problematic writing pedagogy and ineffective writing strategies all together negatively impact the quality of EGP writing in China. Therefore, it is imperative to change the way EGP writing is taught and learned. The present study introduces a blended EGP writing model supported by MOOCs and Juku and investigates students' perceptions of and attitudes towards it through a questionnaire survey and a semi-structured interview. The results of the questionnaire survey and the interview suggest that the students highly appreciated the blended EGP writing model which could benefit them in various ways. Firstly, knowledge, skills and strategies of English writing can be delivered efficiently and authentic English can be learned in the supportive and technology-enhanced learning environment of MOOCs; secondly, Juku can be used both as a useful online writing tool for writing multiple drafts and as an efficient essay grader providing multiple feedback; thirdly, the collaborative learning in class contributes to the consolidation of knowledge, the solution to writing problems and a higher level of student engagement with the interactive and supportive learning atmosphere.

References

[1]
Chinese Ministry of Education. 2015. The Guideline for College English Teaching (Draft Exposure). Retrieved from: https://wenku.baidu.com/view/875e41dc43323968001c9293.html
[2]
Sang, Y. 2017. Investigate the "issues" in Chinese students' English writing and their "reasons": revisiting the recent evidence in Chinese academia. International Journal of Higher Education.6,3 (Apr.2017),1--11.
[3]
You, X. Y. 2004.New directions in EFL writing: a report from China. J.Second Lang Writ. 13,4 (Dec. 2004):253--256.
[4]
Chen, Q. B. 2016. Reconstruction of the teaching model of college English writing in the Big Data era. Foreign Language Research. 190, 3(May 2016), 129--132.
[5]
Zheng, C., and Chang, C. E. 2014. Communication or show-off: a study of the confusion in meaning-structure relationship in undergraduate English writing. Modern Foreign Languages. 37,4(Aug. 2014), 513--524.
[6]
Laksmi, E. D. 2006. "Scaffolding" students' writing in EFL class: implementing process approach. TEFLIN Journal. 17,2(Aug. 2006), 144--156.
[7]
Kupetz, R., and Ziegenmeyer, B. 2005. Blended learning in a teacher training course: integrated interactive e-learning and contact learning. ReCALL. 17,2(Nov. 2005), 179--196.
[8]
Thorne, K. 2003. Blended learning: How to Integrate Online and Traditional Learning. London: Kogan Page.
[9]
Shih, R. C. 2010. Blended learning using video-based blogs: public speaking for English as second language students. Australas. J. Educ.Tec. 26,6 (Aug.2010), 883--897.
[10]
Saritepeci, M, et al. 2015. The effect of blended learning environments on student motivation and student engagement: a study on social studies course. Egit. Bilim. 40,177(Feb. 2015), 203--216.
[11]
Shih, R. C. 2011.Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australas. J. Educ.Tec. 27,5(Jul.2011), 829--845.
[12]
Glance, D. G., Forsey, M., and Riley, M. 2013. The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday. 18,5(May 2013).
[13]
Bárcena, E., Read, T., Martín-Monje, E., and Castrillo, M.D. 2014. Analysing student participation in foreign language MOOCs: a case study. In Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit (Lausanne, Switzerland, Feb. 10-12, 2014).Open Education Europa.11--17.
[14]
Chacón-Beltrán, R. 2014. Massive online open courses and language learning: the case for a beginners' English course. Procd. Soc. Behv. 141 (Aug. 2014), 242--246.
[15]
Sokolik, M. 2014. What constitutes an effective language MOOC? In Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries, E. Martín-Monje and E. Bárcena. De Gruyter Open, Warsaw/Berlin, 16--30.
[16]
Graham, S. and Sandmel. K. 2011. The process writing approach: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104,6 (Oct.2011), 396--407.
[17]
Burstein, J. Chodorow, M and Leacock, C. 2004.Automated essay evaluation: the Criterion online writing service. AI Mag. 25, 3(Fall 2004), 27--35.
[18]
Gao, W. Q. 2017. Application of Automated Essay Scoring System in College English Writing Instruction: An Empirical Study Based on Juku (www.pigai.org). Master's Thesis. China University of Geosciences.
[19]
Goldstein, A. and Carr, P.1996. Can Students Benefit from Process Writing? NAEPfacts. 1,3(Apr.1996), 1--6.

Index Terms

  1. A Survey of Blended Learning for EGP Writing Supported by MOOCs and Juku

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEEL '18: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning
    November 2018
    224 pages
    ISBN:9781450365772
    DOI:10.1145/3291078
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 November 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. EGP writing
    2. Juku
    3. MOOCs
    4. blended learning
    5. in-class activities

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • Shanghai Polytechnic University

    Conference

    ICEEL 2018

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 62
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media