Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3289600.3290991acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

The Local Closure Coefficient: A New Perspective On Network Clustering

Published: 30 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The phenomenon of edge clustering in real-world networks is a fundamental property underlying many ideas and techniques in network science. Clustering is typically quantified by the clustering coefficient, which measures the fraction of pairs of neighbors of a given center node that are connected. However, many common explanations of edge clustering attribute the triadic closure to a head node instead of the center node of a length-2 path; for example, a friend of my friend is also my friend. While such explanations are common in network analysis, there is no measurement for edge clustering that can be attributed to the head node. Here we develop local closure coefficients as a metric quantifying head-node-based edge clustering. We define the local closure coefficient as the fraction of length-2 paths emanating from the head node that induce a triangle. This subtle difference in definition leads to remarkably different properties from traditional clustering coefficients. We analyze correlations with node degree, connect the closure coefficient to community detection, and show that closure coefficients as a feature can improve link prediction.

References

[1]
Dblp network dataset -- KONECT, Apr. 2017.
[2]
N. K. Ahmed, R. A. Rossi, J. B. Lee, X. Kong, T. L. Willke, R. Zhou, and H. Eldardiry. Learning role-based graph embeddings. arXiv, 2018.
[3]
L. Akoglu, M. McGlohon, and C. Faloutsos. Oddball: Spotting anomalies in weighted graphs. In PAKDD, 2010.
[4]
L. Akoglu, H. Tong, and D. Koutra. Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2015.
[5]
P. S. Bearman and J. Moody. Suicide and friendships among american adolescents. Am. J. Public Health, 2004.
[6]
A. R. Benson, D. F. Gleich, and J. Leskovec. Higher-order organization of complex networks. Science, 2016.
[7]
E. Cozzo, M. Kivel"a, M. De Domenico, A. Solé-Ribalta, A. Arenas, S. Gómez, M. A. Porter, and Y. Moreno. Structure of triadic relations in multiplex networks. New Journal of Physics, 17(7):073029, 2015.
[8]
D. Easley and J. Kleinberg. Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[9]
G. Fagiolo. Clustering in complex directed networks. Physical Review E, 76(2):026107, 2007.
[10]
S. Fortunato. Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep, 2010.
[11]
B. K. Fosdick, D. B. Larremore, J. Nishimura, and J. Ugander. Configuring random graph models with fixed degree sequences. SIAM Review, 60(2):315--355, 2018.
[12]
M. Girvan and M. E. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. PNAS, 2002.
[13]
D. F. Gleich and C. Seshadhri. Vertex neighborhoods, low conductance cuts, and good seeds for local community methods. In KDD, 2012.
[14]
R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In WWW, 2004.
[15]
F. Harary et al. On the notion of balance of a signed graph. The Michigan Mathematical Journal, 1953.
[16]
F. Heider. Attitudes and cognitive organization. The J. of Psychology, 1946.
[17]
K. Henderson, B. Gallagher, T. Eliassi-Rad, H. Tong, S. Basu, L. Akoglu, D. Koutra, C. Faloutsos, and L. Li. Rolx: structural role extraction & mining in large graphs. In KDD, 2012.
[18]
M. O. Jackson and B. W. Rogers. Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks? American Economic Review, 97(3):890--915, 2007.
[19]
L. G. Jeub, P. Balachandran, M. A. Porter, P. J. Mucha, and M. W. Mahoney. Think locally, act locally: Detection of small, medium-sized, and large communities in large networks. Physical Review E, 91(1):012821, 2015.
[20]
E. M. Jin, M. Girvan, and M. E. J. Newman. Structure of growing social networks. PRE, 2001.
[21]
M. Kaiser. Mean clustering coefficients: the role of isolated nodes and leafs on clustering measures for small-world networks. New J. Phys., 2008.
[22]
B. Klimt and Y. Yang. Introducing the enron corpus. In CEAS, 2004.
[23]
T. LaFond, J. Neville, and B. Gallagher. Anomaly detection in networks with changing trends. In ODD$^2$ Workshop, 2014.
[24]
J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Microscopic evolution of social networks. In KDD, 2008.
[25]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Signed networks in social media. In CHI, 2010.
[26]
J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In KDD, 2005.
[27]
J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graph evolution: Densification and shrinking diameters. TKDD, 2007.
[28]
D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link-prediction problem for social networks. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2007.
[29]
R. Milo, N. Kashtan, S. Itzkovitz, M. E. J. Newman, and U. Alon. On the uniform generation of random graphs with prescribed degree sequences. arXiv, 2003.
[30]
A. Mislove, H. S. Koppula, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Growth of the flickr social network. In WOSN, 2008.
[31]
M. E. Newman. Assortative mixing in networks. PRL, 2002.
[32]
M. E. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. PRE, 2001.
[33]
M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev., 2003.
[34]
T. Opsahl and P. Panzarasa. Clustering in weighted networks. Social networks, 31(2):155--163, 2009.
[35]
P. Panzarasa, T. Opsahl, and K. M. Carley. Patterns and dynamics of users' behavior and interaction: Network analysis of an online community. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2009.
[36]
A. Paranjape, A. R. Benson, and J. Leskovec. Motifs in temporal networks. In WSDM, 2017.
[37]
M. A. Porter, P. J. Mucha, M. E. J. Newman, and C. M. Warmbrand. A network analysis of committees in the U.S. House of Representatives. PNAS, 2005.
[38]
A. Rapoport. Spread of information through a population with socio-structural bias: I. assumption of transitivity. The Bull. of Math. Biophysics, 1953.
[39]
E. Ravasz and A.-L. Barabási. Hierarchical organization in complex networks. PRE, 2003.
[40]
E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabási. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science, 2002.
[41]
P. Robles, S. Moreno, and J. Neville. Sampling of attributed networks from hierarchical generative models. In KDD, 2016.
[42]
D. M. Romero and J. M. Kleinberg. The directed closure process in hybrid social-information networks, with an analysis of link formation on twitter. In ICWSM, 2010.
[43]
S. E. Schaeffer. Graph clustering. Computer Science Review, 2007.
[44]
C. Seshadhri, T. G. Kolda, and A. Pinar. Community structure and scale-free collections of erdHo s-rényi graphs. PRE, 2012.
[45]
S. N. Soffer and A. Vázquez. Network clustering coefficient without degree-correlation biases. PRE, 2005.
[46]
A. L. Traud, P. J. Mucha, and M. A. Porter. Social structure of facebook networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2012.
[47]
A. Vázquez. Growing network with local rules: Preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy, and degree correlations. PRE, 2003.
[48]
A. Vázquez, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani. Large-scale topological and dynamical properties of the internet. PRE, 2002.
[49]
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social network analysis: Methods and applications, volume 8. Cambridge university press, 1994.
[50]
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 1998.
[51]
Z.-X. Wu and P. Holme. Modeling scientific-citation patterns and other triangle-rich acyclic networks. PRE, 2009.
[52]
J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Defining and evaluating network communities based on ground-truth. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2015.
[53]
H. Yin, A. R. Benson, and J. Leskovec. Higher-order clustering in networks. Physical Review E, 97(5):052306, 2018.
[54]
H. Yin, A. R. Benson, J. Leskovec, and D. F. Gleich. Local higher-order graph clustering. In KDD, 2017.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Network Evolution Model with Preferential Attachment at Triadic Formation StepMathematics10.3390/math1205064312:5(643)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
  • (2024)DeSCo: Towards Generalizable and Scalable Deep Subgraph CountingProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3635788(218-227)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Estimating the parameters of epidemic spread on two-layer random graphs: a classical and a neural network approachJournal of Statistical Theory and Practice10.1007/s42519-024-00405-318:4Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The Local Closure Coefficient: A New Perspective On Network Clustering

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSDM '19: Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
      January 2019
      874 pages
      ISBN:9781450359405
      DOI:10.1145/3289600
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 30 January 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. closure coefficient
      2. clustering
      3. clustering coefficient
      4. community detection
      5. link prediction
      6. networks

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      WSDM '19

      Acceptance Rates

      WSDM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 511 submissions, 16%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

      Upcoming Conference

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)201
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Network Evolution Model with Preferential Attachment at Triadic Formation StepMathematics10.3390/math1205064312:5(643)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2024
      • (2024)DeSCo: Towards Generalizable and Scalable Deep Subgraph CountingProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3635788(218-227)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Estimating the parameters of epidemic spread on two-layer random graphs: a classical and a neural network approachJournal of Statistical Theory and Practice10.1007/s42519-024-00405-318:4Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Central limit theorem for the average closure coefficientActa Mathematica Hungarica10.1007/s10474-024-01416-z172:2(543-569)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Exploring the Threshold Effects in User-User Networks: Insights from MovieLens DataAdvanced Intelligent Technologies and Sustainable Society10.1007/978-981-97-3210-4_31(385-394)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
      • (2023)Randomized graph cluster randomizationJournal of Causal Inference10.1515/jci-2022-001411:1Online publication date: 25-May-2023
      • (2023)Economic geography of innovation: The effect of gender-related aspects of co-inventor networks on country and regional innovationPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.028884318:7(e0288843)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2023
      • (2023)SubAnom: Efficient Subgraph Anomaly Detection Framework over Dynamic Graphs2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023.00154(1178-1185)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
      • (2023)A Network Science Perspective of Graph Convolutional Networks: A SurveyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.326879711(39083-39122)Online publication date: 2023
      • (2023)Topic Discovery in Scientific LiteratureComputer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1007/978-981-99-2356-4_38(481-491)Online publication date: 13-May-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media