Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3287363acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Frequency of Instructor- and Student-Centered Teaching Practices in Introductory CS Courses

Published: 22 February 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Despite growing promotion of student-centered teaching, few studies have assessed how widely these practices have diffused throughout computer science (CS) higher education. Studies on teaching practices often treat instructor- and student-centered learning as being dichotomous. Recent research indicates that this reductionist model misinterprets what actually goes on in CS classrooms. For example, a recent study found that most CS faculty categorized their teaching practices as equally student-centered and instructor-centered. We contribute to this scholarship by reporting the results of a survey disseminated to 821 CS educators in 595 universities, colleges, and community colleges in the U.S. Participants were asked to report how frequently they employed several instructor- or student-centered teaching practices and tools during the most recent semester that they taught a specific course. Results indicate that when asked to reflect on specific behaviors within a certain timeframe, faculty reported using instructor-centered teaching practices, especially delivering content via lecture, more than student-centered practices. However, most faculty also reported using at least one student-centered technique, albeit less frequently, throughout the semester. This study found few differences across certain situational and demographic variables (e.g., institution type, tenure status, etc.). Faculty justify their teaching choices with concern for negative evaluations, desire for student learning, large enrollments, heavy teaching loads, and retaining underrepresented students.

References

[1]
Babbie, E.R. 1990. Survey research methods. Wadsworth Publishing Co.
[2]
Barker, L. and Gruning, J. 2014. The Student Prompt: Student Feedback and Change in Teaching Practices in Postsecondary Computer Science. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (Madrid, Spain, Oct. 2014), 1--8.
[3]
Barker, L., Hovey, C.L. and Gruning, J. 2015. What Influences CS Faculty to Adopt Teaching Practices? Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Kansas City, Missouri, March 4--7, 2015, 2015), 604--609.
[4]
Bell, T., Cockburn, A., Mckenzie, B. and Vargo, J. 2001. Flexible Delivery Damaging to Learning? Lessons from the Canterbury Digital Lectures Project. (2001).
[5]
Borrego, M., Cutler, S., Prince, M., Henderson, C. and Froyd, J.E. 2013. Fidelity of Implementation of Research-Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses. Journal of Engineering Education. 102, 3 (Jul. 2013), 394--425.
[6]
Braxton, J.M., Doyle, W.R., Hartley, H.V., Hirschy, A.S., Jones, W.A. and McLendon, M.K. 2013. Rethinking college student retention. Jossey-Bass.
[7]
Castells, M. 2009. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture Volume I. Wiley-Blackwell.
[8]
Dancy, M. and Henderson, C. 2010. Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics. 78, 10 (Oct. 2010), 1056--1063.
[9]
Dillman, D.A. 2007. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley.
[10]
Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D. and Christian, L.M. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley.
[11]
Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M.P. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111, 23 (Jun. 2014), 8410--8415.
[12]
Grissom, S., Fitzgerald, S., McCauley, R. and Murphy, L. 2017. Exposed! CS Faculty Caught Lecturing in Public: A Survey of Instructional Practices. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (New York, NY, USA, 2017), 261--266.
[13]
Hake, R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics students. American Journal of Physics. 66, 1 (1998), 64--73.
[14]
Henderson, C. and Dancy, M.H. 2007. Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 3, 2 (Sep. 2007), 020102.
[15]
Henderson, C. and Dancy, M.H. 2009. Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. 5, 2 (Dec. 2009), 020107.
[16]
Hovey, C.L., Barker, L. and Nagy, V. forthcoming. Survey Results on Why CS Faculty Adopt New Teaching Practices. Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, Minnesota, forthcoming).
[17]
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System: 2016. http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/.
[18]
Kaput, K. 2018. Evidence for Student-Centered Learning. Technical Report #ED581111. Education Evolving.
[19]
Laursen, S.L., Hassi, M.-L., Kogan, M. and Weston, T.J. 2014. Benefits for Women and Men of Inquiry-Based Learning in College Mathematics: A Multi-Institution Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 45, 4 (2014), 406--418.
[20]
National Academy of Engineering 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press.
[21]
National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US), and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline 2011. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. National Academies Press.
[22]
Obi-Okogbuo, J. 2015. Science, Technology, and Globalization: A Re-Appraisal in the Philosophy of Science and Technology. European Scientific Journal. 11, 14 (May 2015).
[23]
Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. 2005. How college affects students. Volume 2: A third decade of research. Jossey-Bass.
[24]
Porter, L., Guzdial, M., McDowell, C. and Simon, B. 2013. Success in Introductory Programming: What Works? Communications of the ACM. 56, 8 (Aug. 2013), 34--36.
[25]
Russell, J., VanHorne, S., Ward, A.S., Bettis, E.A., Sipola, M., Colombo, M. and Rocheford, M.K. 2016. Large Lecture Transformation: Adopting Evidence-Based Practices to Increase Student Engagement and Performance in an Introductory Science Course. Journal of Geoscience Education; Bellingham. 64, 1 (Feb. 2016), 37--51.
[26]
Shulman, L.S. 2005. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus. 134, 3 (Jun. 2005), 52--59.
[27]
Tourangeau, R. 2000. The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.
[28]
Walter, E.M., Henderson, C.R., Beach, A.L. and Williams, C.T. 2016. Introducing the Postsecondary Instructional Practices Survey (PIPS): A Concise, Interdisciplinary, and Easy-to-Score Survey. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 15, 4 (Dec. 2016), ar53.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Students Investigating Pedagogy: A Project for Learning about Learning in CSProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630933(505-511)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Contextual Influences on the Adoption of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices by Electrical and Computer Engineering FacultyIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2023.333847967:3(351-363)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Portraying the developing PCK of Dutch pre-service geography teachersInternational Research in Geographical and Environmental Education10.1080/10382046.2023.228165233:3(177-192)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2023

Index Terms

  1. Frequency of Instructor- and Student-Centered Teaching Practices in Introductory CS Courses

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    February 2019
    1364 pages
    ISBN:9781450358903
    DOI:10.1145/3287324
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 February 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. evidence-based practices
    2. faculty adoption
    3. instructional techniques and strategies
    4. lecturing
    5. signature pedagogies
    6. student-centered teaching
    7. undergraduate computing education

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    SIGCSE '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 169 of 526 submissions, 32%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE Virtual 2024
    1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
    December 5 - 8, 2024
    Virtual Event , NC , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)93
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Students Investigating Pedagogy: A Project for Learning about Learning in CSProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630933(505-511)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Contextual Influences on the Adoption of Evidence-Based Instructional Practices by Electrical and Computer Engineering FacultyIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2023.333847967:3(351-363)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Portraying the developing PCK of Dutch pre-service geography teachersInternational Research in Geographical and Environmental Education10.1080/10382046.2023.228165233:3(177-192)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2023

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media