Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3284179.3284185acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Approaches of Learning and Computational Thinking in Students that get into the Computer Sciences Career

Published: 24 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The way in which the student processes the information, codifies it and recovers it, constitutes its learning approach. The learning process differentiates two qualitative ways of dealing with this process: the deep approach and the superficial approach. The use of each approach depends on the context. However, the adoption of a deep learning approach is positively related to the academic performance. Computational Thinking is defined as a competence of the XXI century, which allows solving problems from a computational point of view, and there is a variety of instruments that allow to measure it, and to know the state in which the evaluated student is. In this paper, we verified the existence of the positive significant relationship between the learning approach and computational thinking in students entering the career of Computer Sciences. By applying Pearson correlation test to verify the relationship between Learning Approaches and Computational Thinking, we found that both variables have homogeneous behaviors and that students show similar conditions. Men are in better conditions than women on the evaluated aspects of the Computational Thinking, Also, we found a significantly positive relationship between Computational Thinking and the Learning Approach (r = 0,882). This result shows that the learning approaches that students' practice are linked to the computational thinking they demonstrate. According to the results, the teachers of this career must develop active and deep methodological strategies due to the predisposition in these students.

References

[1]
M. Lopez & A. Lopez. (2013). Learning Approaches: Theoretical and Introduction. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 64, 131--153.
[2]
E. Corominas, M. Tesouro & J. Teixidó. (2006). Vinculación de los enfoques de aprendizaje con los intereses profesionales y los rasgos de personalidad. Aportaciones a la innovación del proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje en la educación superior. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 24, 443--473
[3]
J. Biggs, D. Kember & D. Y. P. Leung. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133--149.
[4]
M. Guillermo & S. Contreras. (2014). El constructo Enfoques de Aprendizaje: un análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones en español en los últimos 20 años. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 66, 129--150.
[5]
F. Hernández., P. García, & J. Maquilón. (2005). Análisis del cuestionario de procesos de estudio-2 factores de Biggs en estudiantes universitarios españoles. Revista Fuentes, 6.
[6]
M. Soler. (2015). Enfoques de enseñanza y enfoques de aprendizaje: posibles relaciones entre sí y con el logro académico de los estudiantes en evaluaciones externas. Universidad Pedagogica Nacional.
[7]
J. L. González Geraldo, B. Del Rincón Igea & D. Del Rincón Igea. (2011). Estructura latente y consistencia interna del R-SPQ-2F: reinterpretando los enfoques de aprendizaje en el EEES. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 29(2), 277--293.
[8]
B. Gargallo López, P. Garfella Esteban & C. Pérez Pérez. (2006). Enfoques de aprendizaje y pensamiento computacional en estudiantes universitarios. Bordón, 58(3), 45--61.
[9]
M. Soler & L. Romero. (2014). Análisis de los enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes de jornada nocturna en relación con actividades lúdicas y recreativas. Ludica Pedagógica, 19(1), 101--109.
[10]
I. F. Ramírez-Martínez, G. Gallardo-Matienzo, A. Mita-Arancibia & J. F. Escanero-Marcén. (2015). Estrategias de aprendizaje según los enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes del internado rotatorio de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca (Sucre, Bolivia), 18(1), 15--25.
[11]
J. M. Wing. 2006. Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM 49, 3, 33--35.
[12]
F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2016. What computational thinking is. Journal of Information Technology Research 9, 3, v-viii.
[13]
M. Román González. (2016). Tesis Doctoral "Codigoalfabetización y Pensamiento Computacional en Educación Primaria y Secundaria: Validación de un instrumento y evaluación de programas". Programa de Doctorado En Educación. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. Disponible en http://espacio.uned.es/fez/eserv/tesisuned:Educacion-Mroman/ROMAN_GONZALEZ_Marcos_Tesis.pdf
[14]
J. B. Biggs & K. F. Collis. Evaluating the Quality of Learning. The SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic Press, 1982.
[15]
M. V. Covington & J. M. Kimberly. (2001). Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Motivation: An Approach / Avoidance Reformulation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 157--176.
[16]
H. Oviedo & A. Campo-Arias. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Metodología de Investigación y Lectura Crítica de Estudios, XXXIV(4), 572--580.
[17]
N. Entwistle. (2005). Contrasting Perspectives on Learning. The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education, 3--22. Retrieved from http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/institute-academic-development/learning-teaching/staff/advice/researching/publications/experience-of-learning
[18]
A. Freiberg & M. M. Fernández. (2016). Enfoques de Aprendizaje según el R-SPQ-2F: Análisis de sus propiedades psicométricas en estudiantes universitarios de Buenos Aires. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 25(2), 307--329.
[19]
K. Villalba, S. Castro, C. Deco, C. Bender & F. García Peñalvo. (2017). A recommender system of open educational resources based on the purpose of learning. In Proceedings del Twelfth Latin American Conference of Learning Technologies (LACLO). IEEE.
[20]
F. J. García-Peñalvo and J. A. Mendes. 2018. Exploring the computational thinking effects in pre-university education. Computers in Human Behavior 80, 407--411.
[21]
F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2016. A brief introduction to TACCLE 3 -- Coding European Project. In 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE 16), F.J. García-Peñalvo and J.A. Mendes Eds. IEEE, USA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing implicit computational thinking in game‐based learning: A logical puzzle game studyBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1344355:5(2357-2382)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Development of Computational Thinking through STEM Activities for the Promotion of Gender EqualitySustainability10.3390/su15161233515:16(12335)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Use of Technological Resources for the Development of Computational Thinking Following the Steps of Solving Problems in Engineering Students Recently Entering CollegeEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1303027913:3(279)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Approaches of Learning and Computational Thinking in Students that get into the Computer Sciences Career

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
    October 2018
    1072 pages
    ISBN:9781450365185
    DOI:10.1145/3284179
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 October 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Career of Computer Sciences
    2. Computational Thinking
    3. Learning Approach

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    TEEM'18

    Acceptance Rates

    TEEM'18 Paper Acceptance Rate 151 of 243 submissions, 62%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Assessing implicit computational thinking in game‐based learning: A logical puzzle game studyBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1344355:5(2357-2382)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Development of Computational Thinking through STEM Activities for the Promotion of Gender EqualitySustainability10.3390/su15161233515:16(12335)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Use of Technological Resources for the Development of Computational Thinking Following the Steps of Solving Problems in Engineering Students Recently Entering CollegeEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1303027913:3(279)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Self-Efficacy to Train Computational Thinking Skills in Pre-Service Teachers*2023 XIII International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV)10.1109/JICV59748.2023.10565688(1-4)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
    • (2022)Latin American Women and Computer Science: A Systematic Literature MappingIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2021.311546065:3(356-372)Online publication date: Aug-2022
    • (2021)Study Behavior in Computing Education—A Systematic Literature ReviewACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/346912922:1(1-40)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
    • (2021)Enhancing computational thinking skills in informatics in secondary education: the case of South KoreaEducational Technology Research and Development10.1007/s11423-021-10035-269:5(2869-2893)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2021
    • (2020)Developing computational thinking with a module of solved problemsComputer Applications in Engineering Education10.1002/cae.2221429:3(506-516)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2020
    • (2018)Computational thinking and programming education principlesProceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3284179.3284184(14-17)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2018

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media