research-article

Open access

Eight Observations and 24 Research Questions About Open Source Projects: Illuminating New Realities

Authors:

Matt Germonprez,

Georg J.P. Link,

Sean GogginsAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 2, Issue CSCW

Article No.: 57, Pages 1 - 22

https://doi.org/10.1145/3274326

Published: 01 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The rapid acceleration of corporate engagement with open source projects is drawing out new ways for CSCW researchers to consider the dynamics of these projects. Research must now consider the complex ecosystems within which open source projects are situated, including issues of for-profit motivations, brokering foundations, and corporate collaboration. Localized project considerations cannot reveal broader workings of an open source ecosystem, yet much empirical work is constrained to a local context. In response, we present eight observations from our eight-year engaged field study about the changing nature of open source projects. We ground these observations through 24 research questions that serve as primers to spark research ideas in this new reality of open source projects. This paper contributes to CSCW in social and crowd computing by delivering a rich and fresh look at corporately-engaged open source projects with a call for renewed focus and research into newly emergent areas of interest.

References

[1]

Altay Aksulu and Michael Wade. 2010. A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 11, 11 (2010).

[2]

Kelly Blincoe, Jyoti Sheoran, Sean Goggins, Eva Petakovic, and Daniela Damian. 2016. Understanding the popular users: following, affiliation influence and leadership on GitHub . Information and Software Technology, Vol. 70 (Feb. 2016), 30--39.

Digital Library

[3]

Kelly Blincoe, Giuseppe Valetto, and Sean Goggins. 2012. Proximity: a measure to quantify the need for developers' coordination. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1351--1360.

Digital Library

[4]

Kenneth E. Boulding. 1956. General systems theory-the skeleton of science. Management Science, Vol. 2, 3 (1956), 197--208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2627132

Digital Library

[5]

Henry Chesbrough. 2006. Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1--12.

[6]

Kevin Crowston, James Howison, and Hala Annabi. 2006. Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, Vol. 11, 2 (March 2006), 123--148.

[7]

Kevin Crowston, Qing Li, Kangning Wei, U. Yeliz Eseryel, and James Howison. 2007. Self-organization of teams for free/libre open source software development. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 49, 6 (2007), 564 -- 575.

Digital Library

[8]

Kevin Crowston, Kangning Wei, James Howison, and Andrea Wiggins. 2012. Free/libre open-source software development: what we know and what we do not know. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 44, 2 (Feb. 2012), 7:1--7:35.

Digital Library

[9]

Laura Dabbish, Colleen Stuart, Jason Tsay, and Jim Herbsleb. 2012. Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1277--1286.

Digital Library

[10]

Linus Dahlander. 2007. Penguin in a new suit: a tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 16, 5 (May 2007), 913--943.

[11]

Linus Dahlander, Lars Frederiksen, and Francesco Rullani. 2008. Online communities and open innovation. Industry and Innovation, Vol. 15, 2 (April 2008), 115--123.

[12]

Linus Dahlander and Mats G. Magnusson. 2005. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: observations from Nordic firms. Research Policy, Vol. 34, 4 (May 2005), 481--493.

[13]

Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction .MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Digital Library

[14]

Zakir Durumeric, James Kasten, David Adrian, J. Alex Halderman, Michael Bailey, Frank Li, Nicolas Weaver, Johanna Amann, Jethro Beekman, Mathias Payer, and Vern Paxson. 2014. The matter of Heartbleed. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference (IMC '14). ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 475--488.

Digital Library

[15]

Margaret S. Elliott and Walt Scacchi. 2008. Mobilization of software developers: the free software movement. Information Technology & People, Vol. 21, 1 (2008), 4--33.

[16]

Joseph Feller, Patrick Finnegan, Brian Fitzgerald, and Jeremy Hayes. 2008. From peer production to productization: a study of socially enabled business exchanges in open source service networks. Information Systems Research, Vol. 19, 4 (2008), 475 -- 493.

[17]

Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, R. Benjamin Shapiro, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2017. Growing their own: legitimate peripheral participation for computational learning in an online fandom community. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1375--1386.

Digital Library

[18]

Anna Filippova and Hichang Cho. 2015. Mudslinging and manners: unpacking conflict in free and open source software. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1393--1403.

Digital Library

[19]

Anna Filippova and Hichang Cho. 2016. The effects and antecedents of conflict in free and open source software development. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 705--716.

Digital Library

[20]

Stephen M. Fiore. 2008. Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: how the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, Vol. 39, 3 (June 2008), 251--277.

[21]

Brian Fitzgerald. 2006. The transformation of open source software. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, 3 (2006), 587 -- 598.

Digital Library

[22]

Jan Fook. 2011. Developing critical reflection as a research method. In Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching, Joy Higgs, Angie Titchen, Debbie Horsfall, and Donna Bridges (Eds.). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 55--64.

[23]

Pål Fugelli, Leif C. Lahn, and Anders I. Mørch. 2013. Shared prolepsis and intersubjectivity in open source development: expansive grounding in distributed work. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--144.

Digital Library

[24]

Jonas Gamalielsson and Björn Lundell. 2017. On licensing and other conditions for contributing to widely used open source projects: an exploratory analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9:1--9:14.

Digital Library

[25]

Robin Gandhi, Matt Germonprez, and Georg J.P. Link. 2018. Open data standards for open source software risk management routines: an examination of SPDX. In Proceedings of ACM GROUP '18 . ACM, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 219--229.

Digital Library

[26]

R. Stuart Geiger and David Ribes. 2011. Trace ethnography: following coordination through documentary practices. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Digital Library

[27]

Matt Germonprez, Julie E. Kendall, Kenneth E. Kendall, Lars Mathiassen, Brett Young, and Brian Warner. 2016. A theory of responsive design: a field study of corporate engagement with open source communities. Information Systems Research, Vol. 28, 1 (Nov. 2016), 64--83.

Digital Library

[28]

Sean Goggins, Giuseppe Valetto, Christopher Mascaro, and Kelly Blincoe. 2013b. Creating a model of the dynamics of socio-technical groups. User Modeling & User-Adapted Interaction, Vol. 23, 4 (Sept. 2013), 345--379.

Digital Library

[29]

Sean P. Goggins, Christopher Mascaro, and Giuseppe Valetto. 2013a. Group informatics: a methodological approach and ontology for sociotechnical group research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64, 3 (March 2013), 516--539.

[30]

Carl Gutwin, Reagan Penner, and Kevin Schneider. 2004. Group awareness in distributed software development. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '04). ACM, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 72--81.

Digital Library

[31]

Christine A. Halverson, Jason B. Ellis, Catalina Danis, and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2006. Designing task visualizations to support the coordination of work in software development. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--48.

Digital Library

[32]

Mona Haraty, Joanna McGrenere, and Andrea Bunt. 2017. Online customization sharing ecosystems: components, roles, and motivations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2359--2371.

Digital Library

[33]

James Howison and Kevin Crowston. 2014. Collaboration through open superposition: a theory of the open source way. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 38, 1 (March 2014), 29--50. https://misq.org/collaboration-through-open-superposition.html

Digital Library

[34]

James Howison and James D. Herbsleb. 2013. Incentives and integration in scientific software production. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 459--470.

Digital Library

[35]

Christopher M. Kelty. 2008. Two bits: The cultural significance of free software .Duke University Press, Durham.

Digital Library

[36]

Christopher M. Kelty. 2013. There is no free software. Journal of Peer Production, Vol. 1, 3 (2013). http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-3-free-software-epistemics/debate/there-is-no-free-software/

[37]

Kurt Luther and Amy Bruckman. 2008. Leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 343--352.

Digital Library

[38]

Marg Lynn. 1996. Negotiating practice theory (or, I've got the theory, you've got the practice). In The Reflective Researcher: Social Workers' Theories of Practice Research, Jan Fook (Ed.). Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia, 140--150.

[39]

Jennifer Marlow and Laura Dabbish. 2013. Activity traces and signals in software developer recruitment and hiring. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 145--156.

Digital Library

[40]

Jennifer Marlow and Laura A. Dabbish. 2015. The effects of visualizing activity history on attitudes and behaviors in a peer production context. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 757--764.

Digital Library

[41]

Nora McDonald and Sean Goggins. 2013. Performance and participation in open source software on GitHub. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 139--144.

Digital Library

[42]

Amanda McPherson, Brian Proffitt, and Ron Hale-Evans. 2008. Estimating the total cost of a linux distribution. https://www.linux.com/publications/estimating-total-cost-linux-distribution

[43]

Tom Mens, Maálick Claes, Philippe Grosjean, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2014. Studying evolving software ecosystems based on ecological models. In Evolving Software Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 297--326.

[44]

Steve Morgan. 2018. 2018 cybersecurity market report. https://cybersecurityventures.com/cybersecurity-market-report/

[45]

Siobhán O'Mahony and Fabrizio Ferraro. 2007. The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, 5 (2007), 1079--1106.

[46]

Karl R. Popper. 1969. Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge 3rd ed. (revised) ed.). Routledge & K. Paul, London.

[47]

Malvika Rao, Georg J.P. Link, Don Marti, Andy Leak, and Rich Bodo. 2018. A trading market to incentivize secure software. In 17th Annual Workshop on the Economics of Information Security (WEIS) Proceedings. Innsbruck, Austria. https://weis2018.econinfosec.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/09/WEIS_2018_paper_27.pdf

[48]

D. Riehle, P. Riemer, C. Kolassa, and M. Schmidt. 2014. Paid vs. volunteer work in open source. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on. 3286--3295.

Digital Library

[49]

Sally. 2017. Apache Struts statement on Equifax security breach. https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache-struts-statement-on-equifax

[50]

Walt Scacchi. 2007. Free/open source software development: recent research results and emerging opportunities. In Proceeding ESEC-FSE companion '07 . ACM Press, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 459--468.

Digital Library

[51]

Jodi Schneider, Krystian Samp, Alexandre Passant, and Stefan Decker. 2013. Arguments about deletion: how experience improves the acceptability of arguments in ad-hoc online task groups. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1069--1080.

Digital Library

[52]

Charles M. Schweik and Robert C. English. 2012. Internet success: A study of open-source software commons .MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Digital Library

[53]

Vandana Singh and Michael B. Twidale. 2008. The confusion of crowds: non-dyadic help interactions. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 699--702.

Digital Library

[54]

James P. Spradley. 1980. Participant observation .Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

[55]

Will Steffen, Wendy Broadgate, Lisa Deutsch, Owen Gaffney, and Cornelia Ludwig. 2015. The trajectory of the anthropocene: the great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, Vol. 2, 1 (April 2015), 81--98.

[56]

Igor Steinmacher, Tayana Conte, Marco Aurélio Gerosa, and David Redmiles. 2015. Social barriers faced by newcomers placing their first contribution in open source software projects. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1379--1392.

Digital Library

[57]

Chandrasekar Subramaniam, Ravi Sen, and Matthew L. Nelson. 2009. Determinants of open source software project success: a longitudinal study. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 46, 2 (Jan. 2009), 576--585.

Digital Library

[58]

John van Maanen. 1988. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography .The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

[59]

Bogdan Vasilescu, Alexander Serebrenik, Prem Devanbu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2014. How social Q&A sites are changing knowledge sharing in open source software communities. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 342--354.

Digital Library

[60]

Eric von Hippel and Georg von Krogh. 2003. Open source software and the 'private-collective' innovation model: issues for organization science. Organization Science, Vol. 14, 2 (2003), 209 -- 223.

Digital Library

[61]

Georg von Krogh, Stefan Haefliger, Sebastian Spaeth, and Martin W. Wallin. 2012. Carrots and rainbows: motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, 2 (June 2012), 649--676. http://misq.org/carrots-and-rainbows-motivation-and-social-practice-in-open-source-software-development.html

Digital Library

[62]

Georg Von Krogh and Eric Von Hippel. 2006. The promise of research on open source software. Management Science, Vol. 52, 7 (2006), 975--983. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20110574

Digital Library

[63]

Yi Wang and David Redmiles. 2016. The diffusion of trust and cooperation in teams with individuals' variations on baseline trust. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 303--318.

Digital Library

[64]

Harry F. Wolcott. 2005. The art of fieldwork 2nd ed ed.). Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

[65]

Yutaka Yamauchi, Makoto Yokozawa, Takeshi Shinohara, and Toru Ishida. 2000. Collaboration with lean media: how open-source software succeeds. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 329--338.

Digital Library

[66]

Roshanak Zilouchian Moghaddam, Zane Nicholson, and Brian P. Bailey. 2015. Procid: bridging consensus building theory with the practice of distributed design discussions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 686--699.

Digital Library

Cited By

Cheng KZhou SOlechowski A(2024)"A Lot of Moving Parts": A Case Study of Open-Source Hardware Design Collaboration in the Thingiverse CommunityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870088:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687008
Chauhan ASarkar DAgrawaal TSoden R(2024)Value Tensions in OpenStreetMap: Openness, Membership, and Policy in Online CommunitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869198:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686919
Han YWang ZFeng YZhao ZWang Y(2024)Characterizing Developers' Linguistic Behaviors in Open Source Development across Their Social StatusesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373068:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637306
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Open source software licenses: Strong-copyleft, non-copyleft, or somewhere in between?

Studies on open source software (OSS) have shown that the license under which an OSS is released has an impact on the success or failure of the software. In this paper, we model the relationship between an OSS developer's utility, the effort that goes ...
From proprietary to open source-Growing an open source ecosystem

In today's business and software arena, Free/Libre/Open Source Software has emerged as a promising platform for software ecosystems. Following this trend, more and more companies are releasing their proprietary software as open source, forming a ...
How Successful Open Source Projects Work, and How and Why to Introduce Students to the Open Source World
CSEET '08: Proceedings of the 2008 21st Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training

Open source software is becoming a key driver of the software industry, with key industry players continuing to invest more heavily in open source projects. One of the limiting factors in the continued expansion of open source development is the lack of ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 2, Issue CSCW

November 2018

4104 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3290265

Editors:
Karrie Karahalios
University of Illinois & Adobe
,
Andrés Monroy-Hernández
Snap Inc.
,
Airi Lampinen
Stockholm University
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Vienna University of Technology

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2018

Published in PACMHCI Volume 2, Issue CSCW

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Mozilla
National Science Foundation
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

18
Total Citations
View Citations
1,954
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)291
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)41

Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Cheng KZhou SOlechowski A(2024)"A Lot of Moving Parts": A Case Study of Open-Source Hardware Design Collaboration in the Thingiverse CommunityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870088:CSCW2(1-29)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687008
Chauhan ASarkar DAgrawaal TSoden R(2024)Value Tensions in OpenStreetMap: Openness, Membership, and Policy in Online CommunitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869198:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686919
Han YWang ZFeng YZhao ZWang Y(2024)Characterizing Developers' Linguistic Behaviors in Open Source Development across Their Social StatusesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373068:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637306
Wilner TAdavi KMandava SBhimdiwala AFrluckaj HTurns JArif A(2024)From Concept to Community: Unpacking the Work of Designing Educational and Activist ToolkitsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642681(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642681
Wang YYue YWang WZhang G(2024)Uncovering Non-native Speakers’ Experiences in Global Software Development Teams——a Bourdieusian PerspectiveComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-024-09504-yOnline publication date: 7-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-024-09504-y
Lumbard KGermonprez MGoggins S(2023)An empirical investigation of social comparison and open source community healthInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1248534:2(499-532)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12485
Xia XZhao SZhang XLou ZWang WBi F(2023)Understanding the Archived Projects on GitHub2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)10.1109/SANER56733.2023.00012(13-24)Online publication date: Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER56733.2023.00012
Paxton AVaroquaux NHoldgraf CGeiger R(2022)Community, Time, and (Con)text: A Dynamical Systems Analysis of Online Communication and Community Health among Open‐Source Software CommunitiesCognitive Science10.1111/cogs.1313446:5Online publication date: 17-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13134
Samuel BBala HDaniel SRamesh V(2022)Deconstructing the Nature of Collaboration in Organizations Open Source Software Development: The Impact of Developer and Task CharacteristicsIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2021.310893548:10(3969-3987)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2021.3108935
Caldeira CR.B. de Souza CMachado LPerin MBjørn P(2022)Crisis Readiness: Revisiting the Distance Framework During the COVID-19 PandemicComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-022-09427-632:2(237-273)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10606-022-09427-6
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents