Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3266157.3266212acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiwoarConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Accelerometer-based Step Detection by using a Wheeled Walking Frame

Published: 20 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Step detection with accelerometers is a very common feature that smart wearables already include. However, when using a wheeled walking frame / rollator, current algorithms may be of limited use, since a different type of motion is being excreted. In this paper, we uncover these limitations of current wearables by a pilot study. Furthermore, we investigated an accelerometer-based step detection for using a wheeled walking frame, when mounting an accelerometer to the frame and at the user's wrist. Our findings include knowledge on signal propagation of each axis, knowledge on the required sensor quality and knowledge on the impact of different surfaces and floor types. In conclusion, we outline a new step detection algorithm based on accelerometer input data. Our algorithm can significantly empower future off-the-shelf wearables with the capability to sufficiently detect steps with elderly people using a wheeled walking frame. This can help to evaluate the state of health with regard to the human behavior and motor system and even to determine the progress of certain diseases.

References

[1]
&gesund, mHealth Pioneers GmbH, Berlin, Germany, URL: https://und-gesund.de/en
[2]
b-cared. Caregency GmbH. Vienna, Austria. URL: https://b-cared.com
[3]
Ballesteros, J., Urdiales, C., Martinez, A. B., & van Dieën, J. H. (2016). On Gait Analysis Estimation Errors Using Force Sensors on a Smart Rollator. In Sensors, 16(11), 1896. MDPI.
[4]
Boletsis, C., McCallum, S., & Landmark, B. F. (2015). The use of smartwatches for health monitoring in home-based dementia care. In International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. 15--26. Springer International Publishing.
[5]
Clarke, C. L., Taylor, J., Crighton, L. J., Goodbrand, J. A., McMurdo, M. E., & Witham, M. D. (2016). Validation of the AX3 triaxial accelerometer in older functionally impaired people. In Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 1--7. Springer International Publishing.
[6]
Collins, S. H., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2009). Dynamic arm swinging in human walking. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1673), 3679--3688.
[7]
Ehrler, F., Weber, C., & Lovis, C. (2016). Influence of Pedometer Position on Pedometer Accuracy at Various Walking Speeds: A Comparative Study. In Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(10), e268. JMIR Publications.
[8]
Feng, Y., Wong, C. K., Janeja, V., Kuber, R., & Mentis, H. M. (2017). Comparison of triaxial accelerometers step-count accuracy in slow walking conditions. In Gait & Posture, 53, 11--16. Elsevier.
[9]
Floegel, T. A., Florez-Pregonero, A., Hekler, E. B., & Buman, M. P. (2016). Validation of Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitors in Older Adults with Varied Ambulatory Abilities. In The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, glw098. Oxford Academic.
[10]
Living Safely. Blackham, UK. URL: http://www.livingsafely.com
[11]
Martins, M., Santos, C. P., Page, S., Saint-Bauzel, L., Pasqui, V., & Mézière, A. (2015). Realtime gait assessment with an active depth sensor placed in a walker. In IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). 690--695. IEEE.
[12]
Matthies, D.J.C., Haescher, M., Nanayakkara, S., G. Bieber. (2018). Step Detection for Rollator Users with Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI'18). ACM.
[13]
Melanson, E. L., Knoll, J. R., et. al. (2004). Commercially available pedometers: considerations for accurate step counting. In Preventive medicine, 39(2), 361--368.
[14]
Milenković, A., Otto, C., & Jovanov, E. (2006). Wireless sensor networks for personal health monitoring: Issues and an implementation. In Computer communications, 29(13), 2521--2533. Elsevier.
[15]
Mortazavi, B. J., Pourhomayoun, M., Alsheikh, G., Alshurafa, N., Lee, S. I., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2014). Determining the single best axis for exercise repetition recognition and counting on smartwatches. In 11th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. 33--38. IEEE.
[16]
Next Step Dynamics AB. Malmö, Sweden. URL: http://www.nextstepdynamics.com
[17]
Revolutionary Tracker. USA. URL: http://www.revolutionarytracker.com
[18]
Safe Link. Ottawa, USA. URL: http://safelinkgps.com
[19]
Schlesinger, S., Neuhaus, A., Thiele, A., Kippnich, M., Rashid, A., Griewing, B., & Daumer, M. (2011). Sind Mobilitätseinschränkungen bei Patienten mit Multipler Sklerose messbar? In Klinische Neurophysiologie, 42(01), 17--21. Thieme.
[20]
Shimmer (2016). Shimmer3 Wireless Sensor Platform (low noise acceleration sensor Kionix KXRB5-2042) URL: https://tinyurl.com/shimmer3
[21]
Susi, M., Renaudin, V., & Lachapelle, G. (2013). Motion mode recognition and step detection algorithms for mobile phone users. In Sensors, 13(2), 1539--1562. MDPI.
[22]
Trimpop, J., Schenk, H., Bieber, G., Lämmel, F., Burggraf, P. (2017). Smartwatch based Respiratory Rate and Breathing Pattern Recognition in an End-consumer Environment. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction in Rostock, Germany (iWOAR 2017). ACM.
[23]
Williams, K. L., Choy, N. L. L., & Brauer, S. G. (2016). Are Changes in Gait and Balance Across the Disease Step Rating Scale in Multiple Sclerosis Statistically Significant and Clinically Meaningful?. In Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 97(9), 1502--1508. Elsevier.
[24]
Vildjiounaite, E., Malm, E. J., Kaartinen, J., & Alahuhta, P. (2002). Location estimation indoors by means of small computing power devices, accelerometers, magnetic sensors, and map knowledge. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing (pp. 211--224). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[25]
Weinberg, H. (2002). Using the ADXL202 in pedometer and personal navigation applications. Analog Devices AN-602 application note, 2(2), 1--6.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Determination of the healing corridor of patients with knee arthroplasty by a motor-powered rollatorProceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3529190.3534730(390-395)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022
  • (2020)Enabling Older Adults’ Health Self-Management through Self-Report and Visualization—A Systematic Literature ReviewSensors10.3390/s2015434820:15(4348)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2020
  • (2020)ParaLabel: Autonomous Parameter Learning for Cross-Domain Step Counting in Wearable SensorsIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2020.300923120:23(13867-13879)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
iWOAR '18: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction
September 2018
148 pages
ISBN:9781450364874
DOI:10.1145/3266157
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

  • Fraunhofer IGD: Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGD
  • Rostock: University of Rostock

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 September 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Elderly People
  2. Rollator
  3. Smartwatch
  4. Spatial User Input
  5. Step Counting
  6. Step Detection
  7. Wheeled Walking Frame

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

iWOAR '18

Acceptance Rates

iWOAR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 28 submissions, 54%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 46 of 73 submissions, 63%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Determination of the healing corridor of patients with knee arthroplasty by a motor-powered rollatorProceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3529190.3534730(390-395)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2022
  • (2020)Enabling Older Adults’ Health Self-Management through Self-Report and Visualization—A Systematic Literature ReviewSensors10.3390/s2015434820:15(4348)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2020
  • (2020)ParaLabel: Autonomous Parameter Learning for Cross-Domain Step Counting in Wearable SensorsIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2020.300923120:23(13867-13879)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
  • (2019)RoRoProceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3316782.3322779(430-434)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2019
  • (2018)Step Detection for Rollator Users with SmartwatchesProceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3267782.3267784(163-167)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media