Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3240925.3240978acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Design and Evaluation of Two Robotic Furnishings Partnering with Each Other and Their Users to Enable Independent Living

Published: 21 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We introduce a pair of domestic, robotic furnishings aimed at improving the ability of people to live and work independently. The robotic pair--a mobile, robot-cube and a continuum-robotic lamp-- work together with their human cohabitants to perform routine tasks of daily living enumerated in the 'CS-PFP10' protocol used by rehabilitation therapists to evaluate the capacity for independent living. The iterative design and basic behaviors of the robot pair are considered in this paper, as are results from a formative user evaluation involving older adults and a second study involving twelve clinical staff from a rehabilitation hospital. Finally, we offer recommendations that generalize to related efforts. As robots will inevitably become part of domestic routines, reporting on this robot pair serves as a design exemplar for future development of domestic robots that enable and dignify older individuals.

References

[1]
1995. Special Issue on Robots in Surgery. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 14 (1995).
[2]
AARP. {n. d.}. Aging in Place: A Survey of Livability and Practices, http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ppi/liv-com/ib190.pdf.
[3]
Jenay M Beer, Cory-Ann Smarr, Tiffany L Chen, Akanksha Prakash, Tracy L Mitzner, Charles C Kemp, and Wendy A Rogers. 2012. The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 335--342.
[4]
Sean Bell and Kavita Bala. 2015. Learning visual similarity for product design with convolutional neural networks. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 4 (2015), 98.
[5]
J.J. Callahan. 1992. Aging in place. Generations 2, 16 (1992), 5--6.
[6]
Neena L. Chappell and Zachary Zimmer. 1999. Receptivity to new technology among older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation 21 (1999), 222--230.
[7]
Elaine Cress. {n. d.}. Rehab Measures: Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance (CS-PFP), http://drelainecress.com/cs-pfp-test/.
[8]
Sara J Czaja and Starr Roxanne Hiltz. 2005. Digital aids for an aging society. Commun. ACM 48, 10 (2005), 43--44.
[9]
Carlos Henrique De Aguiar, Reza Fateminasab, Chase G Frazelle, Ryan Scott, Yixiao Wang, Michael B Wooten, Keith E Green, and Ian D Walker. 2016. The networked, robotic home+ furniture suite: A distributed, assistive technology facilitating aging in place. In Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1067--1072.
[10]
Brian Dellon and Yoky Matsuoka. 2007. Prosthetics, exoskeletons, and rehabilitation {grand challenges of robotics}. IEEE robotics & automation magazine 14, 1 (2007), 30--34.
[11]
Zhicong Deng, Martin Stommel, and Weiliang Xu. 2016. A Novel Soft Machine Table for Manipulation of Delicate Objects Inspired by Caterpillar Locomotion. IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 21, 3 (2016), 1702--1710.
[12]
David Fischinger, Peter Einramhof, Konstantinos Papoutsakis, WalterWohlkinger, Peter Mayer, Paul Panek, Stefan Hofmann, Tobias Koertner, Astrid Weiss, Antonis Argyros, et al. 2016. Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons learned. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 75 (2016), 60--78.
[13]
Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and autonomous systems 42, 3-4 (2003), 143--166.
[14]
Birgit Graf, Matthias Hans, and Rolf D Schraft. 2004. Care-O-bot II---Development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Autonomous robots 16, 2 (2004), 193--205.
[15]
Keith Evan Green. 2016. Architectural robotics: ecosystems of bits, bytes, and biology. MIT Press.
[16]
Erico Guizzo. 2014. So, where are my robot servants? IEEE Spectrum 51, 6 (2014), 74--79.
[17]
Starr Roxanne Hiltz and Sara J Czaja. 2006. Introduction to the special issue on information systems for an aging society. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 13, 3 (2006), 309--312.
[18]
Kevin Kelly. 1994. Out of control: The rise of neo-biological civilization. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
[19]
Ross A Knepper, Todd Layton, John Romanishin, and Daniela Rus. 2013. Ikeabot: An autonomous multi-robot coordinated furniture assembly system. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 855--862.
[20]
Larry Leifer. 1981. Rehabilitative robots. Robotics Age 3, 3 (1981), 4--15.
[21]
Steven Levy. 1993. Artificial life: A report from the frontier where computers meet biology. Random House Inc.
[22]
John Markoff. 2014. Brainy yes but far from handy. New York Times 1 (2014).
[23]
Jessica Merino, Anthony L Threatt, Ian D Walker, and Keith Evan Green. 2012. Forward kinematic model for continuum robotic surfaces. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 3453--3460.
[24]
W Mitchell. 1999. e-Topia: urban life, Jim but not as you know it. MIT Press Cambridge.
[25]
Elizabeth D Mynatt and Wendy A Rogers. 2001. Developing technology to support the functional independence of older adults. Ageing International 27, 1 (2001), 24--41.
[26]
Alan Newell. 2003. Inclusive design or assistive technology. In Inclusive Design. Springer, 172--181.
[27]
Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Usability engineering. Elsevier.
[28]
Kwang-Hyun Park, Zeungnam Bien, Ju-Jang Lee, Byung Kook Kim, Jong-Tae Lim, Jin-Oh Kim, Heyoung Lee, Dimitar H Stefanov, Dae-Jin Kim, Jin-Woo Jung, et al. 2007. Robotic smart house to assist people with movement disabilities. Autonomous Robots 22, 2 (2007), 183--198.
[29]
Joelle Pineau, Michael Montemerlo, Martha Pollack, Nicholas Roy, and Sebastian Thrun. 2003. Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results. Robotics and autonomous systems 42, 3-4 (2003), 271--281.
[30]
Ori Systems. {n. d.}. One Room, a Hundred Ways, https://orisystems.com/.
[31]
Anthony L. Threatt, Jessica Merino, Keith Evan Green, Ian D. Walker, Johnell O. Brooks, Sean Ficht, Robert Kriener, Mary Mossey, Alper Mutlu, Darshana Salvi, George Schafer, Pallavi Srikanth, Peng Xu, Joe Manganelli, and Paul Yanik. 2012. A vision of the patient room as an architectural-robotic ecosystem. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 3322--3323.
[32]
Anthony L. Threatt, Jessica Merino, Keith Evan Green, Ian D. Walker, Johnell O. Brooks, and Stan Healy. 2014. An assistive robotic table for older and post-stroke adults: results from participatory design and evaluation activities with clinical staff. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 673--682.
[33]
Shari Trewin, Diogo Marques, and Tiago João Vieira Guerreiro. 2015. Usage of Subjective Scales in Accessibility Research. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 59--67.
[34]
Sherry Turkle. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other.
[35]
Kazuyoshi Wada and Takanori Shibata. 2007. Living With Seal Robots---Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23, 5 (2007), 972--980.
[36]
I.D. Walker and K.E. Green. 2009. The Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, Chapter Continuum Robots, 1475--1485.
[37]
Vincent Wall, Raphael Deimel, and Oliver Brock. 2015. Selective stiffening of soft actuators based on jamming. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 252--257.
[38]
Val Wang. {n. d.}. Two wheeled Robotic Table Balances Drinks, Segway-Style, https://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-06/two-wheeled-robotic-table-balances-drinks-segway-style.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Reading or iPad Gaming? Investigating Socially Interactive Robotic Bookshelf Proactively Engages Children in Reading Physical Books2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309655(1459-1466)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Could Socially Interactive Architectural Robotics Promote Restorative Environments?International Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01040-x16:5(919-936)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
  • (2023)How Do We Want to Interact with Robotic Environments? User Preferences for Embodied Interactions from Pushbuttons to AIDisruptive Technologies: The Convergence of New Paradigms in Architecture10.1007/978-3-031-14160-7_3(25-44)Online publication date: 3-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PervasiveHealth '18: Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
May 2018
413 pages
ISBN:9781450364508
DOI:10.1145/3240925
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • EAI: The European Alliance for Innovation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Acceptability
  2. Design
  3. Enabling Technology
  4. Home-Based Lifestyle Support
  5. Rehabilitation
  6. Robotic Furniture
  7. Usability

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

PervasiveHealth '18

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Reading or iPad Gaming? Investigating Socially Interactive Robotic Bookshelf Proactively Engages Children in Reading Physical Books2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309655(1459-1466)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Could Socially Interactive Architectural Robotics Promote Restorative Environments?International Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-01040-x16:5(919-936)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2023
  • (2023)How Do We Want to Interact with Robotic Environments? User Preferences for Embodied Interactions from Pushbuttons to AIDisruptive Technologies: The Convergence of New Paradigms in Architecture10.1007/978-3-031-14160-7_3(25-44)Online publication date: 3-May-2023
  • (2022)Examining Identity as a Variable of Health Technology Research for Older Adults: A Systematic ReviewProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517621(1-24)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Application of Robotics to Domestic and Environmental Cleanup TasksIntelligent Computing10.1007/978-3-030-80119-9_42(657-665)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2021
  • (2019)A system for bedside assistance that integrates a robotic bed and a mobile manipulatorPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.022185414:10(e0221854)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019
  • (2019)Strange PlacesProceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3294109.3300998(173-180)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Robots in the Home: A Novel Suite of Interactive Devices for Assisting with Disease Prevention and Meal Preparation2019 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)10.1109/GHTC46095.2019.9033064(1-4)Online publication date: Oct-2019
  • (2019)Design and Characterization of a Novel, Continuum-Robot Surface for the Human Environment2019 IEEE 15th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)10.1109/COASE.2019.8842988(1169-1174)Online publication date: Aug-2019

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media