Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3240323.3240401acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Learning within-session budgets from browsing trajectories

Published: 27 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Building price- and budget-aware recommender systems is critical in settings where one wishes to produce recommendations that balance users' preferences (what they like) with a model of purchase likelihood (what they will buy). A trivial solution consists of learning global budget terms for each user based on their past expenditure. To more accurately model user budgets, we also consider a user's within-session budget, which may deviate from their global budget depending on their shopping context. In this paper, we find that users implicitly reveal their session-specific budgets through the sequence of items they browse within that session. Specifically, we find that some users "browse down," by purchasing the cheapest item among alternatives under consideration, others "browse up" (selecting the most expensive), and others ultimately purchase items around the middle. Surprisingly, this mixture of behaviors is difficult to observe globally, as individual users tend to belong firmly to one of the three segments. To model this behavior, we develop an interpretable budget model that combines a clustering component to detect different user segments, with a model of segment-specific purchase profiles. We apply our model on a dataset of browsing and purchasing sessions from Etsy, a large e-commerce website focused on handmade and vintage goods, where it outperforms strong baselines and existing production systems.

References

[1]
Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2016. An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace. In WWW.
[2]
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In KDD.
[3]
David M. Blei Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Susan Athey. 2017. SHOPPER: A Probabilistic Model of Consumer Choice with Substitutes and Complements. In Arxiv.
[4]
Yong Ge, Qi Liu, Hui Xiong, Alexander Tuzhilin, and Jian Chen. 2011. Cost-aware Travel Tour Recommendation. In KDD.
[5]
Yunhui Guo, Congfu Xu, Hanzhang Song, and Xin Wang. 2017. Understanding Users' Budgets for Recommendation with Hierarchical Poisson Factorization. In IJCAI.
[6]
Gawesh Jawaheer, Martin Szomszor, and Patty Kostkova. 2010. Comparison of implicit and explicit feedback from an online music recommendation service. In HetRec.
[7]
Gawesh Jawaheer, Peter Weller, and Patty Kostkova. 2014. Modeling user preferences in recommender systems: A classification framework for explicit and implicit user feedback. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (2014).
[8]
Yuanchun Jiang and Yezheng Liu. 2012. Optimization of online promotion: a profit-maximizing model integrating price discount and product recommendation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 11, 05 (2012), 961--982.
[9]
Yuanchun Jiang, Jennifer Shang, Yezheng Liu, and Jerrold May. 2015. Redesigning promotion strategy for e-commerce competitiveness through pricing and recommendation. International Journal of Production Economics 167 (2015), 257--270.
[10]
Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer (2009).
[11]
Nathan N Liu, Evan W Xiang, Min Zhao, and Qiang Yang. 2010. Unifying explicit and implicit feedback for collaborative filtering. In CIKM.
[12]
Weike Pan, Nathan N Liu, Evan W Xiang, and Qiang Yang. 2011. Transfer learning to predict missing ratings via heterogeneous user feedbacks. In IJCAI.
[13]
Denis Parra and Xavier Amatriain. 2011. Walk the talk: Analyzing the Relation between Implicit and Explicit Feedback for Preference Elicitation. In UMAP.
[14]
Denis Parra, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Xavier Amatriain, and Idil Yavuz. 2011. Implicit feedback recommendation via implicit-to-explicit ordinal logistic regression mapping. In CARS.
[15]
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (2011), 2825--2830.
[16]
Steffen Rendle. 2012. Factorization machines with libfm. TIST 3, 3 (2012), 57.
[17]
S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In UAI.
[18]
J Ben Schafer, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. 1999. Recommender systems in e-commerce. In EC.
[19]
Trinh Xuan Tuan and Tu Minh Phuong. 2017. 3D Convolutional Networks for Session-based Recommendation with Content Features. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 138--146.
[20]
Panniello Umberto. 2015. Developing a Price-Sensitive Recommender System to Improve Accuracy and Business Performance of Ecommerce Applications. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies 6, 1 (2015), 1.
[21]
M. Wan, D. Wang, M. Goldman, M. Taddy, J. Rao, J. Liu, D. Lymberopoulos, and J. McAuley. 2017. Modeling consumer preferences and price sensitivities from large-scale grocery shopping transaction logs. In World Wide Web.
[22]
Qi Zhao, Yi Zhang, Daniel Friedman, and Fangfang Tan. 2015. E-commerce Recommendation with Personalized Promotion. In Recsys.
[23]
Meizi Zhou, Zhuoye Ding, Jiliang Tang, and Dawei Yin. 2018. Micro behaviors: A new perspective in e-commerce recommender systems. In WSDM. ACM.

Index Terms

  1. Learning within-session budgets from browsing trajectories

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      RecSys '18: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      September 2018
      600 pages
      ISBN:9781450359016
      DOI:10.1145/3240323
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 27 September 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Conference

      RecSys '18
      Sponsor:
      RecSys '18: Twelfth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      October 2, 2018
      British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

      Acceptance Rates

      RecSys '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 32 of 181 submissions, 18%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 243
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media