Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E. and Virza, M. Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. In Proceedings of IEEE SP 2014, 459--474.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Biryukov, A. and Khovratovich, D. Equihash: Asymmetric proof-of-work based on the Generalized Birthday Problem. In Proceedings of NDSS 2016.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[4]

Biryukov, A. and Khovratovich, D. and Pustogarov, I. Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network. In Proceedings of ACM CCS 2014, 15--29.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Biryukov, A. and Pustogarov, I. Bitcoin over Tor isn't a Good Idea. In Proceedings of IEEE SP, 2015, 122--134.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Bissias, G.D., Ozisik, A.P., Levine, B.N. and Liberatore, M. Sybil-resistant mixing for Bitcoin. In Proceedings of WPES, 2014, 149--158.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Bonneau, J., Miller, A., Clark, J., Narayanan, A., Kroll, J.A. and Felten, E.W. SoK: Research perspectives and challenges for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. In Proceedings of IEEE SP, 2015, 104--121.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Bonneau, J., Narayanan, A., Miller, A., Clark, J., Kroll, J.A. and Felten, E.W. Mixcoin: Anonymity for Bitcoin with accountable mixes. In Proceedings of FC, 2014, 486--504.

Google Scholar

[9]

Camenisch, J. and Lysyanskaya, A. Dynamic accumulators and application to efficient revocation of anonymous credentials. In Proceedings of CRYPTO, 2002, 61--76.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Canetti, R. Universally composable security: A new paradigm for cryptographic protocols. In Proceedings of FOCS, 2001, 136--145.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

Chaum, D. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In Proceedings of CRYPTO '82, 199-203.

Google Scholar

[12]

Fujisaki, E. and Suzuki, K. Traceable ring signature. In Proceedings of PKC, 2007, 181--200.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

Gennaro, R., Gentry, C., Parno, B. and Raykova, M. Quadratic span programs and succinct NIZKs without PCPs. In Proceedings of EUROCRYPT, 2013, 626--645.

Google Scholar

[14]

Gentry, C. and Wichs, D. Separating succinct non-interactive arguments from all falsifiable assumptions. In Proceedings of STOC, 2011, 99--108.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

Green, M.D. and Miers, I. Bolt: Anonymous payment channels for decentralized currencies. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2016, 701.

Google Scholar

[16]

Heilman, E., Baldimtsi, F., Alshenibr, L., Scafuro, A. and Goldberg, S. TumbleBit: An untrusted tumbler for Bitcoin-compatible anonymous payments. In Proceedings of NDSS, 2017.

Google Scholar

[17]

Hileman, G. and Rauchs, M. Global cryptocurrency benchmarking study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study, 2017.

Google Scholar

[18]

Juels A., Kosba, A. E., and Shi, E. The ring of Gyges: Investigating the future of criminal smart contracts. In Proceedings of ACM CCS, 2016, 283--295.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[19]

Kosba, A.E., Miller, A., Shi, E, Wen, Z., and Papamanthou, C. Hawk: The blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. In Proceedings of IEEE SP, 2016, 839--858.

Google Scholar

[20]

Maxwell, G. CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world. bitcointalk.org, Aug. 2013.

Google Scholar

[21]

Maxwell, G. CoinSwap: Transaction graph disjoint trustless trading. bitcointalk.org, Oct. 2013.

Google Scholar

[22]

Meiklejohn, S. and Orlandi, C. Privacy-enhancing overlays in Bitcoin. In Proceedings of FC Workshops, BITCOIN, WAHC, and Wearable, 2015, 127--141.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[23]

Meiklejohn, S., Pomarole, M., Jordan, G., Levchenko, K., McCoy, D., Voelker, G. M., and Savage, S. A fistful of Bitcoins: Characterizing payments among men with no names. In Proceedings of IMC, 2013, 127--140.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

Merkle, R.C. A certified digital signature. In Proceedings of CRYPTO '89, 218--238.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

Miers, I., Garman, C., Green, M., and Rubin, A.D. Zerocoin: Anonymous distributed e-cash from Bitcoin. In Proceedings of IEEE SP, 2013, 397--411.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[26]

Moreno-Sanchez, P., Kate, A., Maffei, M., and Pecina, K. Privacy preserving payments in credit networks: Enabling trust with privacy in online marketplaces. In Proceedings of NDSS, 2015.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[27]

Möser, M. An Inquiry into Money Laundering Tools in the Bitcoin Ecosystem. In IEEE 2013 eCrime Researchers Summit.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[28]

Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, 2008; http://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.

Google Scholar

[29]

Noether, S., Mackenzie, A., and the Monero Research Lab. Ring confidential transactions. Ledger 1 (2016) 1--18.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[30]

Reid, F. and Harrigan, M. An analysis of anonymity in the Bitcoin system. In Proceedings of IEEE PASSAT and SocialCom, 2011, 1318--1326.

Google Scholar

[31]

Ron, D. and Shamir, A. Quantitative analysis of the full Bitcoin transaction graph. In Proceedings of FC 2013, 6--24.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[32]

Ruffing, T. and Moreno-Sanchez, P. Mixing confidential transactions: Comprehensive transaction privacy for bitcoin. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2017, 238.

Google Scholar

[33]

Ruffing, T., Moreno-Sanchez, P., and Kate, A. CoinShuffle: Practical decentralized coin mixing for Bitcoin. In Proceedings of ESORICS, 2014.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[34]

Ruffing, T., Moreno-Sanchez, P., and Kate, A. P2P mixing and unlinkable Bitcoin transactions. In Proceedings of NDSS, 2017.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[35]

Sahai, A. Non-malleable non-interactive zero knowledge and adaptive chosen ciphertext security. In Proceedings of FOCS '99, 543--553.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[36]

Sweeney, L. k-Anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. Intern. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10, 5 (2002), 557--570.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[37]

Valenta, L. and Rowan, B. Blindcoin: Blinded, accountable mixes for Bitcoin. In Proceedings of the 2015 FC International Workshops, BITCOIN, WAHC, and Wearable, 112--126.

Google Scholar

[38]

van Saberhagen, N. CryptoNote v 2.0; https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf.

Google Scholar

[39]

Ziegeldorf, J. H., Grossmann, F., Henze, M., Inden, N., and Wehrle, K. CoinParty: Secure multi-party mixing of Bitcoins. CODASPY (2015), 75--86.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Liang WLiu YYang CXie SLi KSusilo W(2024)On Identity, Transaction, and Smart Contract Privacy on Permissioned and Permissionless Blockchain: A Comprehensive SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/367616456:12(1-35)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676164
Werth OCardona DTorno ABreitner MMuntermann J(2023)What determines FinTech success?—A taxonomy-based analysis of FinTech success factorsElectronic Markets10.1007/s12525-023-00626-733:1Online publication date: 19-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00626-7
Kolachala KSimsek EAbabneh MVishwanathan R(2021)SoK: Money Laundering in CryptocurrenciesProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security10.1145/3465481.3465774(1-10)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3465481.3465774
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Privacy in decentralized cryptocurrencies

Recommendations

Toward Privacy and Regulation in Blockchain-Based Cryptocurrencies
Privacy is supreme in cryptocurrencies since most users do not want to reveal their identities or the transaction amount in financial transactions. Nevertheless, achieving privacy in blockchain-based cryptocurrencies remains challenging since blockchain ...
Understanding Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Digital Cryptocurrencies
Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing
Abstract
Asset security and transaction efficiency have always been concerned, so that digital cryptocurrencies based on blockchain are increasingly favored. In the transaction, it is necessary to effectively protect private information such as identity ...
Cryptocurrencies: Transparency Versus Privacy [Cybertrust]

Reports on cryptocurrencies and examined issues and concerns of privacy and information security. Cryptocurrencies can have significant privacy costs. A motivated adversary has available a range of actions to identify the actual user associated with a ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Communications of the ACM Volume 61, Issue 6

June 2018

97 pages

ISSN:0001-0782

EISSN:1557-7317

DOI:10.1145/3229066

Editor:
Andrew A. Chien
Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 May 2018

Published in CACM Volume 61, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Review-article
Popular
Refereed

Funding Sources

U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
2017-2018 Rothschild Postdoctoral Fellowship
NSF
Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA)

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

17
Total Citations
View Citations
9,266
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)558
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34

Reflects downloads up to 14 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Liang WLiu YYang CXie SLi KSusilo W(2024)On Identity, Transaction, and Smart Contract Privacy on Permissioned and Permissionless Blockchain: A Comprehensive SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/367616456:12(1-35)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676164
Werth OCardona DTorno ABreitner MMuntermann J(2023)What determines FinTech success?—A taxonomy-based analysis of FinTech success factorsElectronic Markets10.1007/s12525-023-00626-733:1Online publication date: 19-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00626-7
Kolachala KSimsek EAbabneh MVishwanathan R(2021)SoK: Money Laundering in CryptocurrenciesProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security10.1145/3465481.3465774(1-10)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3465481.3465774
Chen XCheng WOuellet MLi YMaimon DWu Y(2021)Identifying Darknet Vendor Wallets by Matching Feedback Reviews with Bitcoin Transactions2021 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW53433.2021.00102(788-797)Online publication date: Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW53433.2021.00102
Yi HLi YWang MYan ZNie Z(2021)An Efficient Blockchain Consensus Algorithm Based on Post-Quantum Threshold SignatureBig Data Research10.1016/j.bdr.2021.10026826:COnline publication date: 15-Nov-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.bdr.2021.100268
Chen YFeng QLuo MLi LHe D(2021)An Identity-Based Blind Signature and Its Application for Privacy Preservation in BitcoinApplied Cryptography in Computer and Communications10.1007/978-3-030-80851-8_2(10-24)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80851-8_2
Renwick RGleasure R(2020)Those who control the code control the rules: How different perspectives of privacy are being written into the code of blockchain systemsJournal of Information Technology10.1177/026839622094440636:1(16-38)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220944406
Partala JNguyen TPirttikangas S(2020)Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge for Blockchain: A SurveyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30460258(227945-227961)Online publication date: 2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046025
Bhushan BSharma N(2020)Transaction Privacy Preservations for Blockchain TechnologyInternational Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications10.1007/978-981-15-5148-2_34(377-393)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5148-2_34
Shibuya KShibuya K(2020)Identity ProtectionDigital Transformation of Identity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-981-15-2248-2_5(73-88)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2248-2_5
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Toward Privacy and Regulation in Blockchain-Based Cryptocurrencies

Understanding Privacy-Preserving Techniques in Digital Cryptocurrencies

Cryptocurrencies: Transparency Versus Privacy [Cybertrust]

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations