Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Price Shock Detection With an Influence-Based Model of Social Attention

Published: 29 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in exploring the impact of human behavior on financial market dynamics. One of the important related questions is whether attention from society can lead to significant stock price movements or even abnormal returns. To answer the question, we develop a new measurement of social attention, named periodic cumulative degree of social attention, by simultaneously considering the individual influence and the information propagation in social networks. Based on the vast social network data, we evaluate the new attention measurement by testing its significance in explaining future abnormal returns. In addition, we test the forecasting ability of social attention for stock price shocks, defined by the cumulative abnormal returns. Our results provide significant evidence to support the intercorrelated relationship between the social attention and future abnormal returns. The outperformance of the new approach in predicting price shocks is also confirmed by comparison with several benchmark methods.

References

[1]
Anup Agrawal, Jeffrey F. Jaffe, and Gershon N. Mandelker. 1992. The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Finance 47, 4, 1605--162.
[2]
Daniel Andrei and Michael Hasler. 2014. Investor attention and stock market volatility. Review of Financial Studies 28, 1, 33--72.
[3]
Werner Antweiler and Murray Z. Frank. 2004. Is all that talk just noise? The information content of Internet stock message boards. Journal of Finance 59, 3, 1259--1294.
[4]
Ray Ball and Philip Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6, 2, 159--178.
[5]
Alon Brav, Christopher Geczy, and Paul A. Gompers. 2000. Is the abnormal return following equity issuances anomalous? Journal of Financial Economics 56, 2, 209--249.
[6]
Jie Cai, Ralph A. Walkling, and Ke Yang. 2016. The price of street friends: Social networks, informed trading, and shareholder costs. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 51, 3, 801--837.
[7]
Hailiang Chen, Prabuddha De, Yu Hu, and Byoung-Hyoun Hwang. 2014. Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Review of Financial Studies 27, 5, 1367--1403.
[8]
Hao Chen, Keli Xiao, Jinwen Sun, and Song Wu. 2017. A double-layer neural network framework for high-frequency forecasting. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 7, 4, 11.
[9]
Zhi Da, Joseph Engelberg, and Pengjie Gao. 2011. In search of attention. Journal of Finance 66, 5, 1461--1499.
[10]
Peter Lloyd Davies and Michael Canes. 1978. Stock prices and the publication of second-hand information. Journal of Business 51, 1, 43--56.
[11]
Michael S. Drake, Jared Jennings, Darren T. Roulstone, and Jacob R. Thornock. 2016. The comovement of investor attention. Management Science. Available at http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2477?journalCode=mnsc.
[12]
Olubunmi Faleye, Tunde Kovacs, and Anand Venkateswaran. 2014. Do better-connected CEOs innovate more? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 49, 5--6, 1201--1225.
[13]
Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 1, 3--56.
[14]
Jacob Goldenberg, Barak Libai, and Eitan Muller. 2001. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters 12, 3, 211--223.
[15]
Mark Granovetter. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83, 6, 1420--1443.
[16]
Bernd Hayo and Ali M. Kutan. 2005. The impact of news, oil prices, and global market developments on Russian financial markets. Economics of Transition 13, 2, 373--393.
[17]
David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg, and Éva Tardos. 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York, NY, 137--146.
[18]
Jennifer L. Koski, Edward M. Rice, and Ali Tarhouni. 2004. Noise trading and volatility: Evidence from day trading and message boards. SSRN. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=533943.
[19]
Albert S. Kyle. 1985. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 53, 6, 1315--1335.
[20]
Victor Lavrenko, Matt Schmill, Dawn Lawrie, Paul Ogilvie, David Jensen, and James Allan. 2000. Mining of concurrent text and time series. In Proceedings of the KDD 2000 Workshop on Text Mining, Vol. 2000. 37--44.
[21]
Alvin Chung Man Leung, Ashish Agarwal, Prabhudev Konana, and Alok Kumar. 2016. Network analysis of search dynamics: The case of stock habitats. Management Science. Available at http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2470?journalCode=mnsc.
[22]
Qi Liu, Biao Xiang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Enhong Chen, Hui Xiong, Yi Zheng, and Yu Yang. 2017. An influence propagation view of PageRank. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 11, 3, 30.
[23]
Xueming Luo, Jie Zhang, and Wenjing Duan. 2013. Social media and firm equity value. Information Systems Research 24, 1, 146--163.
[24]
Shiguang Ma. 2004. The Efficiency of China’s Stock Market. Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
[25]
Sanjiv Sabherwal, Salil K. Sarkar, and Ying Zhang. 2008. Online talk: Does it matter? Managerial Finance 34, 6, 423--436.
[26]
Robert P. Schumaker and Hsinchun Chen. 2009. Textual analysis of stock market prediction using breaking financial news: The AZFin text system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 27, 2, 12.
[27]
William F. Sharpe. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19, 3, 425--442.
[28]
David Simon and Rawley Heimer. 2012. Facebook Finance: How Social Interaction Propagates Active Investing. Working Paper No. 15-22. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
[29]
Timm O. Sprenger, Andranik Tumasjan, Philipp G. Sandner, and Isabell M. Welpe. 2014. Tweets and trades: The information content of stock microblogs. European Financial Management 20, 5, 926--957.
[30]
Chih-Fong Tsai and Zen-Yu Quan. 2014. Stock prediction by searching for similarities in candlestick charts. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 5, 2, 9.
[31]
Biao Xiang, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Hui Xiong, Yi Zheng, and Yu Yang. 2013. PageRank with priors: An influence propagation perspective. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’13). 2740--2746.
[32]
Steve Y. Yang, Sheung Yin Kevin Mo, and Anqi Liu. 2015. Twitter financial community sentiment and its predictive relationship to stock market movement. Quantitative Finance 15, 10, 1637--1656.
[33]
Li Zhang, Keli Xiao, Qi Liu, Yefan Tao, and Yuefan Deng. 2015. Modeling social attention for stock analysis: An influence propagation perspective. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’15). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 609--618.
[34]
Li Zhang, Liang Zhang, Keli Xiao, and Qi Liu. 2016. Forecasting price shocks with social attention and sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM’16). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 559--566.
[35]
David Zimbra, Hsinchun Chen, and Robert F. Lusch. 2015. Stakeholder analyses of firm-related Web forums: Applications in stock return prediction. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 6, 1, 2.
[36]
C. F. Tsai and Z. Y. Quan. 2014. Stock prediction by searching for similarities in candlestick charts. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS). 5, 2, 9.
[37]
M. C. Lin, A. J. Lee, R. T. Kao, and K. T. Chen. 2011. Stock price movement prediction using representative prototypes of financial reports. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS). 2, 3, 19.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Stock Shocks Modelling and Forecasting2023 IEEE 43rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW)10.1109/ICDCSW60045.2023.00014(67-72)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2023
  • (2023)A multi-agent model of urban microgrids: Assessing the effects of energy-market shocks using real-world dataApplied Energy10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121180343(121180)Online publication date: Aug-2023
  • (2022)Dynamic road crime risk prediction with urban open dataFrontiers of Computer Science: Selected Publications from Chinese Universities10.1007/s11704-021-0136-z16:1Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 9, Issue 1
March 2018
89 pages
ISSN:2158-656X
EISSN:2158-6578
DOI:10.1145/3146385
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 September 2017
Accepted: 01 August 2017
Revised: 01 March 2017
Received: 01 June 2016
Published in TMIS Volume 9, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Social network
  2. abnormal return
  3. influence propagation
  4. price shock
  5. social attention
  6. the Chinese stock market

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Collaborative Innovation Center for Economics Crime Investigation and Prevention Technology, Jiangxi, China
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS
  • Jiangxi Social Science Planning Project, China

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Stock Shocks Modelling and Forecasting2023 IEEE 43rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW)10.1109/ICDCSW60045.2023.00014(67-72)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2023
  • (2023)A multi-agent model of urban microgrids: Assessing the effects of energy-market shocks using real-world dataApplied Energy10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121180343(121180)Online publication date: Aug-2023
  • (2022)Dynamic road crime risk prediction with urban open dataFrontiers of Computer Science: Selected Publications from Chinese Universities10.1007/s11704-021-0136-z16:1Online publication date: 1-Feb-2022
  • (2020)Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multiple-Choice Oriented Machine ComprehensionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/337212011:3(1-20)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2020
  • (2020)Multi-User Mobile Sequential Recommendation for Route OptimizationACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/336004814:5(1-28)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
  • (2020) Maximum a Posteriori Estimation for Information Source Detection IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems10.1109/TSMC.2018.281141050:6(2242-2256)Online publication date: Jun-2020
  • (2020)WITHDRAWN: Corporate financial risk prediction based on embedded system and deep learningMicroprocessors and Microsystems10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103405(103405)Online publication date: Nov-2020
  • (2019)Catching Them Red-HandedACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/332552210:2(1-26)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2019
  • (2019)A Penny Is Worth a Thousand? Investigating the Relationship Between Social Media and Penny StocksACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/33097049:4(1-35)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2019
  • (2019)MCNEProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining10.1145/3292500.3330931(1064-1072)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media