Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
column

Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback

Published: 02 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

This paper examines the reliability of implicit feedback generated from clickthrough data in WWW search. Analyzing the users' decision process using eyetracking and comparing implicit feedback against manual relevance judgments, we conclude that clicks are informative but biased. While this makes the interpretation of clicks as absolute relevance judgments difficult, we show that relative preferences derived from clicks are reasonably accurate on average.

References

[1]
R. Almeida and V. Almeida. A community-aware search engine. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2004.
[2]
B. Bartell, G. Cottrell, and R. Belew. Automatic combination of multiple ranked retrieval systems. In Annual ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pages 173--181, 1994.
[3]
R. Belew. Finding Out About. Cambridge, 2000.
[4]
J. Boyan, D. Freitag, and T. Joachims. A machine learning architecture for optimizing web search engines. In AAAI Workshop on Internet Based Information Systems, pages 1--8, August 1996.
[5]
A. Broder. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum, 36(2):3--10, 2002.
[6]
M. Claypool, P. Le, M. Waseda, and D. Brown. Implicit interest indicators. In International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), pages 33--40, 2001.
[7]
W. Cohen, R. Shapire, and Y. Singer. Learning to order things. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10:243--270, 1999.
[8]
S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve the search experiences. In Talk presented at SIGIR03 Workshop on Implicit Measures of User Interests and Preferences, 2003.
[9]
N. Fuhr. Optimum polynomial retrieval functions based on the probability ranking principle. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 7(3):183--204, 1989.
[10]
J. Goldberg, M. Stimson, M. Lewenstein, M. Scott, and A. Wichansky. Eye-tracking in web search tasks: design implications. In Proceedings of the Eye tracking Research and Applications Symposium (ETRA), pages 51--58, 2002.
[11]
L. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2004.
[12]
T. Halverson and A. Hornof. Link colors guide a search. In ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI), 2004.
[13]
S. Holland, M. Ester, and W. Kieling. Preference mining: A novel approach on mining user preferences for personalized applications. In Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD), pages 204--216, 2003.
[14]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2002.
[15]
M. Just and P. Carpenter. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87:329--354, 1980.
[16]
D. Kelly and N. Belkin. Display time as implicit feedback: Understanding task effects. In ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pages 377--384, 2004.
[17]
D. Kemp and K. Ramamohanarao. Long-term learning for web search engines. In European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD), pages 263--274, 2002.
[18]
K. Kloeckner, N. Wirschum, and A. Jameson. Depth- and breadth-first processing of search result lists. In ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 2004.
[19]
C. Lankford. Gazetracker: software designed to facilitate eye movement analysis. In Proceedings of Eye Tracking Research & Applications, pages 51--55, 2000.
[20]
M. Morita and Y. Shinoda. Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pages 272--281, 1994.
[21]
B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, G. Gay, L. Granka, M. Feusner, and J. Newman. The determinants of web page viewing behavior: An eye tracking study. In S. Spencer, editor, Proceedings of Eye Tracking Research & Applications. ACM, New York, 2004.
[22]
F. Radlinski and T. Joachims. Query chains: Learning to rank from implicit feedback. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2005.
[23]
K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 124:372--252, 1998.
[24]
E. Russo and F. LeClerc. An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2):274--290, 1994.
[25]
J. Salogarvi, I. Kojo, S. Jaana, and S. Kaski. Can relevance be inferred from eye movements in information retrieval? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps, pages 261--266, 2003.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating the Usability of mHealth Apps: An Evaluation Model Based on Task Analysis Methods and Eye Movement DataHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1213131012:13(1310)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Influence of hate speech about refugees in search algorithms on political attitudes: An online experimentNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448241244735Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Information about Tummy Time in infants available on the InternetHealth Education Journal10.1177/0017896924124104383:3(293-308)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM SIGIR Forum
      ACM SIGIR Forum  Volume 51, Issue 1
      June 2017
      73 pages
      ISSN:0163-5840
      DOI:10.1145/3130332
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 August 2017
      Published in SIGIR Volume 51, Issue 1

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Clickthrough
      2. Eyetracking
      3. Implicit Feedback
      4. WWWSearch

      Qualifiers

      • Column

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)115
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
      Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Evaluating the Usability of mHealth Apps: An Evaluation Model Based on Task Analysis Methods and Eye Movement DataHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1213131012:13(1310)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Influence of hate speech about refugees in search algorithms on political attitudes: An online experimentNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448241244735Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Information about Tummy Time in infants available on the InternetHealth Education Journal10.1177/0017896924124104383:3(293-308)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2024
      • (2024)A Recommendation Approach Based on Heterogeneous Network and Dynamic Knowledge GraphInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems10.1155/2024/41694022024Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
      • (2024)Online and Offline Evaluation in Search ClarificationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/368178643:1(1-30)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
      • (2024)ReCRec: Reasoning the Causes of Implicit Feedback for Debiased RecommendationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/367227542:6(1-26)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Utility-Oriented Reranking with Counterfactual ContextACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/367100418:8(1-22)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Non-autoregressive Generative Models for Reranking RecommendationProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671645(5625-5634)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Balancing Act: Boosting Strategies for Informed Search on Controversial TopicsProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638329(254-265)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Disentangling Web Search on Debated Topics: A User-Centered ExplorationProceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3627043.3659559(24-35)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media