Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3125659.3125692acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the Likes and Dislikes of YouTube's Educational Videos: A Quantitative Study

Published: 27 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

As major product of information technology, YouTube is a ubiquitous source for education, also in the field of information technology. Learners, however, are facing the increasing problem of finding appropriate videos on YouTube efficiently. Users' rating in terms of Likes and Dislikes could provide a starting point. However, it is unclear what the number of Likes and Dislikes reveal about the video. This paper tries to create links between different video features and users' rating of YouTube's educational content. For this purpose, 300 educational videos were collected and analyzed and regression models were established that describe the number of Likes per view and the number of Dislikes per view as functions of different video features and production styles. Results show that the number of Likes per view can be predicted more reliably than the number of Dislikes per view. The number of Likes per view increases with higher video resolution and higher talking rate (words per second), and when the instructor or tutor speaks English as a native language. Videos using explanations on paper or whiteboard as well as videos that use more than one style attract more Likes per view. In contrast, the model that describes the number of Dislikes per view has a low adjusted R-squared and the contribution of its significant variables is rather difficult to interpret. This suggests that further research is required to understand users' behavior in terms of disliking an educational video.

References

[1]
Dorothy DeWitt, Norlidah Alias, Saedah Siraj, Mohd Yusaini Yaakub, Juhara Ayob, and Rosman Ishak. 2013. The potential of Youtube for teaching and learning in the performing arts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 103 (2013), 1118--1126.
[2]
Ian Duncan, Lee Yarwood-Ross, and Carol Haigh. 2013. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse education today Vol. 33, 12 (2013), 1576--1580.
[3]
Jonas Fischer, Jeroen Geurts, Victor Valderrabano, and Thomas Hügle. 2013. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology Vol. 19, 7 (2013), 373--376.
[4]
Philip J Guo, Juho Kim, and Rob Rubin. 2014. How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference. ACM, 41--50.
[5]
Peter Gustafsson. 2012. YouTube as an educational tool in physics teaching IOSTE XV International Symposium, Science & Technology Education for Development, Citizenship and Social Justice, La Medina-Yasmine Hammamet.
[6]
Anna Hansch, Katherine McConachie, Philipp Schmidt, Lisa Hillers, Christopher Newman, and T. Schildhauer. 2015. The Role of Video in Online Learning: Findings From the Field and Critical Reflections. (2015).
[7]
Paul Haridakis and Gary Hanson. 2009. Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol. 53, 2 (2009), 317--335.
[8]
Matthew Ho, Lynn Stothers, Darren Lazare, Brian Tsang, and Andrew Macnab. 2015. Evaluation of educational content of YouTube videos relating to neurogenic bladder and intermittent catheterization. Canadian Urological Association Journal Vol. 9, 9--10 (2015), 320.
[9]
Akram Abood Jaffar. 2012. YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education. Anatomical sciences education Vol. 5, 3 (2012), 158--164.
[10]
Insung Jung and Yekyung Lee. 2015. YouTube acceptance by university educators and students: a cross-cultural perspective. Innovations in education and teaching international, Vol. 52, 3 (2015), 243--253.
[11]
Brent Kelsen. 2009. Teaching EFL to the iGeneration: A survey of using YouTube as supplementary material with college EFL students in Taiwan. Call-EJ Online, Vol. 10, 2 (2009), 1--18.
[12]
M. Laeeq Khan. 2017. Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 66 (2017), 236--247.
[13]
Larry Lagerstrom, Petr Johanes, and Mr. Umnouy Ponsukcharoen. 2015. The Myth of the Six Minute Rule: Student Engagement with Online Videos. age Vol. 26 (2015), 1.
[14]
Katie Lai. 2013. How Are Our Undergraduates Using YouTube? A Survey on Music Students? Use of YouTube and the Library's Multimedia Collection. Music Reference Services Quarterly Vol. 16, 4 (2013), 199--217.
[15]
Wen Ying Lim, Yuin Xian Chew, Cyn Ye Chan, Shyir Khie Leow, Siti Badriyah Mohamad Rozlan, and William Junior Yong. 2016. Students' Acceptance of YouTube for Procedural Learning. Handbook of Research on Leveraging Consumer Psychology for Effective Customer Engagement (2016), 57.
[16]
Iain Pardoe. 2012. Applied regression modeling: a business approach. John Wiley & Sons.
[17]
Diane J Skiba. 2007. Nursing education 2.0: YouTube?. Nursing Education Perspectives Vol. 28, 2 (2007), 100--102.
[18]
Chareen Snelson, Kerry Rice, and Constance Wyzard. 2012. Research priorities for YouTube and video-sharing technologies: A Delphi study. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 43, 1 (2012), 119--129.
[19]
Petra ten Hove and Hans van der Meij 2015. Like It or Not. What Characterizes YouTube's More Popular Instructional Videos? Technical communication Vol. 62, 1 (2015), 48--62.
[20]
Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Ulrik Schroeder, and Marold Wosnitza. 2014. What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on. IEEE, 44--48.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Users’ experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory studyBMC Public Health10.1186/s12889-023-17585-524:1Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
  • (2022)Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic reviewBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z22:1Online publication date: 19-May-2022
  • (2022) Share , Comment , and Like on Facebook and Message Strategies of Non-Governmental organizations Sage Open10.1177/2158244022107987612:1Online publication date: 8-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGITE '17: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education
September 2017
202 pages
ISBN:9781450351003
DOI:10.1145/3125659
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 September 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. dislikes
  2. likes
  3. user behavior
  4. video features
  5. video production style

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGITE/RIIT 2017
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGITE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 58 submissions, 40%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 176 of 429 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 09 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Users’ experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory studyBMC Public Health10.1186/s12889-023-17585-524:1Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
  • (2022)Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic reviewBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z22:1Online publication date: 19-May-2022
  • (2022) Share , Comment , and Like on Facebook and Message Strategies of Non-Governmental organizations Sage Open10.1177/2158244022107987612:1Online publication date: 8-Mar-2022
  • (2020)SIGITE and SIGCSE SymposiumsProceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education10.1145/3368308.3415400(132-137)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media