Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3190645.3190682acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterization of differentially private logistic regression

Published: 29 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present an approach that can help data owners select suitable values for the privacy parameter of a differentially private logistic regression (DPLR), whose main intention is to achieve a balance between privacy strength and classification accuracy. The proposed approach implements a supervised learning technique and a feature extraction technique to address this challenging problem and generate solutions. The supervised learning technique selects subspaces from a training data set and generates DPLR classifiers for a range of values of the privacy parameter. The feature extraction technique transforms an original subspace to a differentially private subspace by querying the original subspace multiple times using the DPLR model and the privacy parameter values that were selected by the supervised learning module. The proposed approach then employs a signal processing technique called signal-interference-ratio as a measure to quantify the privacy level of the differentially private subspaces; hence, allows data owner learn the privacy level that the DPLR models can provide for a given subspace and a given classification accuracy.

References

[1]
Yoshinori Aono, Takuya Hayashi, Le Trieu Phong, and Lihua Wang. 2016. Privacy-preserving logistic regression with distributed data sources via homomorphic encryption. IEICE TRANS. on Information and Systems 99, 8 (2016), 2079--2089.
[2]
Yoshinori Aono, Takuya Hayashi, Le Trieu Phong, and Lihua Wang. 2017. Input and Output Privacy-Preserving Linear Regression. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems 100, 10 (2017), 2339--2347.
[3]
Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32.
[4]
Jean-François Cardoso and Antoine Souloumiac. 1993. Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. In IEE proceedings F (radar and signal processing), Vol. 140. IET, 362--370.
[5]
Kamalika Chaudhuri and Claire Monteleoni. 2009. Privacy-preserving logistic regression. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 289--296.
[6]
Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, Kobbi Nissim, and Adam Smith. 2006. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In TCC, Vol. 3876. Springer, 265--284.
[7]
Justin Hsu, Marco Gaboardi, Andreas Haeberlen, Sanjeev Khanna, Arjun Narayan, Benjamin C Pierce, and Aaron Roth. 2014. Differential privacy: An economic method for choosing epsilon. In Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), 2014 IEEE 27th. IEEE, 398--410.
[8]
Zhanglong Ji and Charles Elkan. 2013. Differential privacy based on importance weighting. Machine learning 93, 1 (2013), 163--183.
[9]
Zhanglong Ji, Xiaoqian Jiang, Shuang Wang, Li Xiong, and Lucila Ohno-Machado. 2014. Differentially private distributed logistic regression using private and public data. BMC medical genomics 7, 1 (2014), S14.
[10]
Jari Miettinen, Klaus Nordhausen, and Sara Taskinen. 2017. Blind source separation based on joint diagonalization in R: The packages JADE and BSSasymp. Journal of Statistical Software 76 (2017).
[11]
Maurizio Naldi and Giuseppe D'Acquisto. 2015. Differential Privacy: An Estimation Theory-Based Method for Choosing Epsilon. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.00917 (2015).
[12]
Saeed Samet. 2015. Privacy-Preserving Logistic Regression. Journal of Advances in Information Technology Vol 6, 3 (2015).
[13]
Shan Suthaharan. 2015. Machine Learning Models and Algorithms for Big Data Classification: Thinking with Examples for Effective Learning. Springer 36 (2015).
[14]
Yyyyyy Xxxxx and Zzzzzzz Xxx. yyyy. It anonymizes this paper to support double-blind reviewing process of the conference. name of the conference (yyyy).
[15]
V Zarzoso and AK Nandi. 1999. Blind source separation. In Blind Estimation Using Higher-Order Statistics. Springer, 167--252.
[16]
Xu Dong Zhu, Hui Li, and Feng Hua Li. 2013. Privacy-preserving logistic regression outsourcing in cloud computing. International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing 4, 2--3 (2013), 144--150.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Privacy protection of medical data in social networkBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making10.1186/s12911-021-01645-021:S1Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2019)OPTIMIZATION OF SUPPLY AND SALES ACTIVITIES OF THE ENTERPRISE THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF LOGISTIC PRINCIPLESScience and Transport Progress10.15802/stp2018/153957(37-46)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ACMSE '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Southeast Conference
March 2018
246 pages
ISBN:9781450356961
DOI:10.1145/3190645
  • Conference Chair:
  • Ka-Wing Wong,
  • Program Chair:
  • Chi Shen,
  • Publications Chair:
  • Dana Brown
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 March 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. blind source separation
  2. classification
  3. differential privacy
  4. logistic regression
  5. random forest

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ACM SE '18
Sponsor:
ACM SE '18: Southeast Conference
March 29 - 31, 2018
Kentucky, Richmond

Acceptance Rates

ACMSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 34 of 41 submissions, 83%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 502 of 1,023 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Privacy protection of medical data in social networkBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making10.1186/s12911-021-01645-021:S1Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2019)OPTIMIZATION OF SUPPLY AND SALES ACTIVITIES OF THE ENTERPRISE THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF LOGISTIC PRINCIPLESScience and Transport Progress10.15802/stp2018/153957(37-46)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2019

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media