Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3188745.3188836acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Shape of diffusion and size of monochromatic region of a two-dimensional spin system

Published: 20 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We consider an agent-based distributed algorithm with exponentially distributed waiting times in which agents with binary states interact locally over a geometric graph, and based on this interaction and on the value of a common intolerance threshold τ, decide whether to change their states. This model is equivalent to an Asynchronous Cellular Automaton (ACA) with extended Moore neighborhoods, a zero-temperature Ising model with Glauber dynamics, or a Schelling model of self-organized segregation in an open system, and has applications in the analysis of social and biological networks, and spin glasses systems.
We prove a shape theorem for the spread of the “affected” nodes during the process dynamics and show that in the steady state, for τ ∈ (τ*,1−τ*) ∖ {1/2}, where τ* ≈ 0.488, the size of the “mono-chromatic region” at the end of the process is at least exponential in the size of the local neighborhood of interaction with probability approaching one as N grows. Combined with previous results on the expected size of the monochromatic region that provide a matching upper bound, this implies that in the steady state the size of the monochromatic region of any agent is exponential with high probability for the mentioned interval of τ. The shape theorem is based on a novel concentration inequality for the spreading time, and provides a precise geometrical description of the process dynamics. The result on the size of the monochromatic region considerably extends our understanding of the steady state. Showing convergence with high probability, it rules out the possibility that only a small fraction of the nodes are eventually contained in large monochromatic regions, which was left open by previous works.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (1c-3.mp4)

References

[1]
OSM Alves, Fabio P Machado, S Yu Popov, et al. 2002. The shape theorem for the frog model. The Annals of Applied Probability 12, 2 (2002), 533–546.
[2]
Richard Arratia. 1983. Site Recurrence for Annihilating Random Walks on Z d. Ann. Probab. 11, 3 (08 1983), 706–713.
[3]
George Barmpalias, Richard Elwes, and Andy Lewis-Pye. 2014. Digital morphogenesis via Schelling segregation. In Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on. IEEE, 156–165.
[4]
George Barmpalias, Richard Elwes, and Andy Lewis-Pye. 2015. Minority population in the one-dimensional Schelling model of segregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.02497 (2015).
[5]
George Barmpalias, Richard Elwes, and Andy Lewis-Pye. 2015. Tipping points in 1-dimensional Schelling models with switching agents. Journal of Statistical Physics 158, 4 (2015), 806–852.
[6]
George Barmpalias, Richard Elwes, and Andrew Lewis-Pye. 2016. Unperturbed Schelling Segregation in Two or Three Dimensions. Journal of Statistical Physics 164, 6 (01 Sep 2016), 1460–1487.
[7]
016- 1589- 6
[8]
Prateek Bhakta, Sarah Miracle, and Dana Randall. 2014. Clustering and mixing times for segregation models on Z d. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 327–340.
[9]
Christina Brandt, Nicole Immorlica, Gautam Kamath, and Robert Kleinberg. 2012.
[10]
An analysis of one-dimensional Schelling segregation. In Proceedings of the fortyfourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. ACM, 789–804.
[11]
Pietro Caputo and Fabio Martinelli. 2006. Phase ordering after a deep quench: the stochastic Ising and hard core gas models on a tree. Probability theory and related fields 136, 1 (2006), 37–80.
[12]
Claudio Castellano, Santo Fortunato, and Vittorio Loreto. 2009. Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of modern physics 81, 2 (2009), 591.
[13]
B Chopard and M Droz. 1998.
[14]
Cellular automata. Springer.
[15]
Moez Draief and Laurent Massouli. 2010.
[16]
Epidemics and rumours in complex networks. Cambridge University Press.
[17]
Alexander Drewitz, Balázs Ráth, and Artëm Sapozhnikov. 2014.
[18]
On chemical distances and shape theorems in percolation models with long-range correlations. J. Math. Phys. 55, 8 (2014), 083307.
[19]
David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. 2010.
[20]
Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
P. Erdos and P. Ney. 1974. Some problems on random intervals and annihilating particles. The Annals of Probability 2, 5 (1974), 828–839.
[22]
Luiz Renato Fontes, RH Schonmann, and Vladas Sidoravicius. 2002. Stretched exponential fixation in stochastic Ising models at zero temperature. Communications in mathematical physics 228, 3 (2002), 495–518.
[23]
Cees M Fortuin, Pieter W Kasteleyn, and Jean Ginibre. 1971. Correlation inequalities on some partially ordered sets. Communications in Mathematical Physics 22, 2 (1971), 89–103.
[24]
GR Grimmett. 1999. Percolation, second ed. Springer 321 (1999).
[25]
Herbert W Hethcote. 2000. The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM review 42, 4 (2000), 599–653.
[26]
Nicole Immorlica, Robert Kleinberg, Brendan Lucier, and Morteza Zadomighaddam. 2017. Exponential Segregation in a Two-dimensional Schelling Model with Tolerant Individuals. (2017), 984–993. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3039686.
[27]
[28]
Matthew O Jackson and Alison Watts. 2002.
[29]
On the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games. Games and Economic Behavior 41, 2 (2002), 265–291.
[30]
Yashodhan Kanoria, Andrea Montanari, et al. 2011. Majority dynamics on trees and the dynamic cavity method. The Annals of Applied Probability 21, 5 (2011), 1694–1748.
[31]
Harry Kesten. 1986. Aspects of first passage percolation. École d’Été de Probabilités de Saint Flour XIV-1984 (1986), 125–264.
[32]
Harry Kesten. 1993.
[33]
On the Speed of Convergence in First-Passage Percolation. Ann. Appl. Probab. 3, 2 (05 1993), 296–338. 1177005426
[34]
Jon Kleinberg. 2007. Cascading behavior in networks: Algorithmic and economic issues. Algorithmic game theory 24 (2007), 613–632.
[35]
Thomas Liggett. 2012.
[36]
Interacting particle systems. Vol. 276. Springer Science & Business Media.
[37]
Thomas M Liggett. 2013.
[38]
Stochastic interacting systems: contact, voter and exclusion processes. Vol. 324. Springer Science & Business Media.
[39]
Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns. 2003. Immigration, integration and ghetto formation. International Journal of Modern Physics C 14, 03 (2003), 311–320.
[40]
Markus M Mobius and TS Rosenblat. 2000. The formation of ghettos as a local interaction phenomenon. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University (2000).
[41]
Robert Morris. 2011.
[42]
Zero-temperature Glauber dynamics on Z d. Probability theory and related fields 149, 3-4 (2011), 417–434.
[43]
Hamed Omidvar and Massimo Franceschetti. 2017. Self-organized Segregation on the Grid. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 401–410. 1145/3087801.3087826
[44]
Hamed Omidvar and Massimo Franceschetti. 2018. Evolution and Steady State of a Long-Range Two-Dimensional Schelling-Type Spin System. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.00358 (2018).
[45]
Hamed Omidvar and Massimo Franceschetti. 2018. Self-organized Segregation on the Grid. Journal of Statistical Physics 170, 4 (2018), 748–783.
[46]
Thomas C Schelling. 1969. Models of Segregation. The American Economic Review 59, 2 (1969), 488–493.
[47]
Thomas C Schelling. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of mathematical sociology 1, 2 (1971), 143–186.
[48]
Christian Schulze. 2005. Potts-like model for ghetto formation in multi-cultural societies. International Journal of Modern Physics C 16, 03 (2005), 351–355.
[49]
Dietrich Stauffer and Sorin Solomon. 2007. Ising, Schelling and self-organising segregation. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 57, 4 (2007), 473–479.
[50]
Michel Talagrand. 1995. Concentration of measure and isoperimetric inequalities in product spaces. Publications Mathematiques de l’IHES 81, 1 (1995), 73–205.
[51]
Romain Tessera. 2017.
[52]
Speed of convergence in first passage percolation and geodesicity of the average distance. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré (2017).
[53]
H Peyton Young. 2001.
[54]
Individual strategy and social structure: An evolutionary theory of institutions. Princeton University Press.
[55]
Junfu Zhang. 2004.
[56]
A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 28, 3 (2004), 147–170.
[57]
Junfu Zhang. 2004. Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 54, 4 (2004), 533–550.
[58]
Junfu Zhang. 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)The Impact of Geometry on Monochrome Regions in the Flip Schelling ProcessComputational Geometry10.1016/j.comgeo.2022.101902(101902)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • (2022)Topological influence and locality in swap schelling gamesAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-022-09573-736:2Online publication date: 16-Aug-2022

Index Terms

  1. Shape of diffusion and size of monochromatic region of a two-dimensional spin system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC 2018: Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 2018
    1332 pages
    ISBN:9781450355599
    DOI:10.1145/3188745
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Agent-based Model
    2. Asynchronous Cellular Automata
    3. Distributed Algorithm
    4. Exponential Segregation
    5. First Passage Percolation
    6. Percolation Theory
    7. Self-organized Segregation
    8. Unperturbed Schelling Segregation
    9. Zero temperature Ising Model

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Army Research Office (ARO)

    Conference

    STOC '18
    Sponsor:
    STOC '18: Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 25 - 29, 2018
    CA, Los Angeles, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)The Impact of Geometry on Monochrome Regions in the Flip Schelling ProcessComputational Geometry10.1016/j.comgeo.2022.101902(101902)Online publication date: Jun-2022
    • (2022)Topological influence and locality in swap schelling gamesAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-022-09573-736:2Online publication date: 16-Aug-2022

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media