Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3167918.3167960acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesaus-cswConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A semantic system for answering questions in neuroinformatics

Published: 29 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Neuroinformatics is an important area of study in biomedical science and health informatics. Scientists in neuroscience tend to ask questions that are complicated, time consuming to answer and need multiple tasks in order to get to the result. In this paper, we introduce and report an ontology-based system for answering neuroscience questions automatically. The system uses a combination of ontologies such as NIFSTD and NeuroFMA, a template-based question translation method that translates questions to SparQL codes and MRI outputes (annotations) in order to classify and answer questions. It also uses an ontology-based query expansion module.
The outcomes show the ontology-based question classification achieves 87.5% correct classification on the data set and the system can successfully answer 78.13% of questions. This research also uses machine learning techniques such as Naïve-Bayes, KNN, SVM and Random Forest to classify questions which respectively result in 54.54%, 68.18%, 72.72% and 77.27% correct classification.

References

[1]
Huda Akil, Maryann E Martone, and David C Van Essen. 2011. Challenges and opportunities in mining neuroscience data. science 331, 6018 (2011), 708--712.
[2]
Ali Mohamed Nabil Allam and Mohamed Hassan Haggag. 2012. The question answering systems: A survey. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Information Sciences (IJRRIS) 2, 3 (2012).
[3]
Giorgio A Ascoli. 2012. Twenty questions for neuroscience metadata. (2012).
[4]
Sofia J Athenikos and Hyoil Han. 2010. Biomedical question answering: A survey. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 99, 1 (2010), 1--24.
[5]
Margaret Chan. 2010. Mental health and development: targeting people with mental health conditions as a vulnerable group. World Health Organization (2010).
[6]
Mathieu d'Aquin and Enrico Motta. 2011. Watson, more than a semantic web search engine. Semantic Web 2, 1 (2011), 55--63.
[7]
Heiko Dietze and Michael Schroeder. 2009. GoWeb: a semantic search engine for the life science web. BMC bioinformatics 10, 10 (2009), S7.
[8]
Li Ding, Tim Finin, Anupam Joshi, Rong Pan, R Scott Cost, Yun Peng, Pavan Reddivari, Vishal Doshi, and Joel Sachs. 2004. Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 652--659.
[9]
Andreas Doms and Michael Schroeder. 2005. Go : exploring with the gene ontology. Nucleic acids research 33, suppl_2 (2005), W783--W786.
[10]
Bruce Fischl. 2012. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 2 (2012), 774--781.
[11]
Paul Fontelo, Fang Liu, and Michael Ackerman. 2005. ask MEDLINE: a free-text, natural language query tool for MEDLINE/ . BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 5, 1 (2005), 5.
[12]
Eibe Frank, Mark Hall, Geoffrey Holmes, Richard Kirkby, Bernhard Pfahringer, Ian H Witten, and Len Trigg. 2009. Weka-a machine learning workbench for data mining. In Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. Springer, 1269--1277.
[13]
J Grethe, A Gupta, A Bandrowski, F Imam, J Cachat, G Shepherd, P Miller, L Marenco, G Ascoli, P Sternberg, et al. 2011. The Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF): A Unified Semantic Framework and Portal for Discovery and Integration of Biomedical Data and Resources on the Web. In Front. Neuroinform. Conference Abstract: 4th INCF Congress of Neuroinformatics. fninf, Vol. 99.
[14]
Thomas R Gruber. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition 5, 2 (1993), 199--220.
[15]
Amarnath Gupta, Christopher Condit, and Xufei Qian. 2010. BioDB: An ontology-enhanced information system for heterogeneous biological information. Data & Knowledge Engineering 69, 11 (2010), 1084--1102.
[16]
Ian Horrocks. 2013. What Are Ontologies Good For? In Evolution of Semantic Systems. Springer, 175--188.
[17]
Fahim T Imam, Stephen D Larson, Jeffrey S Grethe, Amarnath Gupta, Anita Bandrowski, and Maryann E Martone. 2011. NIFSTD and NeuroLex: Comprehensive Neuroscience Ontology Development Based on Multiple Biomedical Ontologies and Community Involvement. In ICBO.
[18]
Sebastian Köhler, Sandra C Doelken, Ana Rath, Ségolène Aymé, and Peter N Robinson. 2012. Ontological phenotype standards for neurogenetics. Human mutation 33, 9 (2012), 1333--1339.
[19]
Ilianna Kollia, Birte Glimm, and Ian Horrocks. 2011. SPARQL query answering over OWL ontologies. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications (2011), 382--396.
[20]
Vanessa Lopez, Michele Pasin, and Enrico Motta. 2005. Aqualog: An ontology-portable question answering system for the semantic web. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications (2005), 135--166.
[21]
Vanessa Lopez, Victoria Uren, Enrico Motta, and Michele Pasin. 2007. AquaLog: An ontology-driven question answering system for organizational semantic intranets. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5, 2 (2007), 72--105.
[22]
Hans-Michael Müller, Arun Rangarajan, Tracy K Teal, and Paul W Sternberg. 2008. Textpresso for neuroscience: searching the full text of thousands of neuroscience research papers. Neuroinformatics 6, 3 (2008), 195--204.
[23]
B Nolan Nichols, Jose LV Mejino Jr, and James F Brinkley. 2011. The Foundational Model of Neuroanatomy Ontology: An Ontology Framework to Support Neuroanatomical Data Integration. In ICBO.
[24]
B Nolan Nichols, Daniel L Rubin, James F Brinkley, Jessica A Turner, Jose LV Mejino, Landon T Detwiler, Maryann E Martone, and Trond T Nilsen. 2014. Neuroanatomical domain of the foundational model of anatomy ontology. Journal of biomedical semantics 5, 1 (2014), 1.
[25]
Shiyan Ou, Constantin Orasan, Dalila Mekhaldi, and Laura Hasler. 2008. Automatic Question Pattern Generation for Ontology-based Question Answering. In FLAIRS Conference. 183--188.
[26]
I Burak Ozyurt, David B Keator, Dingying Wei, Christine Fennema-Notestine, Karen R Pease, Jeremy Bockholt, and Jeffrey S Grethe. 2010. Federated web-accessible clinical data management within an extensible neuroimaging database. Neuroinformatics 8, 4 (2010), 231--249.
[27]
Cornelius Rosse and José LV Mejino. 2003. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. Journal of biomedical informatics 36, 6 (2003), 478--500.
[28]
Nayat Sanchez-Pi, Luis Martí, and Ana Cristina Bicharra Garcia. 2016. Improving ontology-based text classification: An occupational health and security application. Journal of Applied Logic 17 (2016), 48--58.
[29]
Rudi Studer, V Richard Benjamins, and Dieter Fensel. 1998. Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data & knowledge engineering 25, 1-2 (1998), 161--197.
[30]
Lynda Temal, Michel Dojat, Gilles Kassel, and Bernard Gibaud. 2008. Towards an ontology for sharing medical images and regions of interest in neuroimaging. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41, 5 (2008), 766--778.
[31]
David Tomás and José L Vicedo. 2013. Minimally supervised question classification on fine-grained taxonomies. Knowledge and information systems 36, 2 (2013), 303--334.
[32]
George Tsatsaronis, Georgios Balikas, Prodromos Malakasiotis, Ioannis Partalas, Matthias Zschunke, Michael R Alvers, Dirk Weissenborn, Anastasia Krithara, Sergios Petridis, Dimitris Polychronopoulos, et al. 2015. An overview of the bioasq large-scale biomedical semantic indexing and question answering competition. BMC bioinformatics 16, 1 (2015), 138.
[33]
Giovanni Tummarello, Renaud Delbru, and Eyal Oren. 2007. Sindice. com: Weaving the open linked data. In The Semantic Web. Springer, 552--565.
[34]
Jessica A Turner, Jose LV Mejino, James F Brinkley, Landon T Detwiler, Hyo Jong Lee, Maryann E Martone, and Daniel L Rubin. 2010. Application of neuroanatomical ontologies for neuroimaging data annotation. Frontiers in neuroinformatics 4 (2010).
[35]
Christina Unger, Lorenz Bühmann, Jens Lehmann, A-C Ngonga Ngomo, Daniel Gerber, and Philipp Cimiano. 2012. Sparql template-based question answering. In Proceedings of WWW.
[36]
Alper Kursat Uysal and Serkan Gunal. 2014. The impact of preprocessing on text classification. Information Processing & Management 50, 1 (2014), 104--112.
[37]
Merriam Webster. 2006. Merriam-Webster online dictionary. (2006).

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Analysing, Representing and Classifying Neuroscience Questions Using OntologiesBrain Informatics10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_24(257-266)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Resolving Neuroscience Questions Using Ontologies and TemplatesBrain Informatics10.1007/978-3-030-59277-6_13(141-150)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ACSW '18: Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference
January 2018
404 pages
ISBN:9781450354363
DOI:10.1145/3167918
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • CORE: Computing Research and Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 January 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. neuroimaging
  2. neuroinformatics
  3. ontology
  4. question answering
  5. question classification

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ACSW 2018
Sponsor:
  • CORE
ACSW 2018: Australasian Computer Science Week 2018
January 29 - February 2, 2018
Queensland, Brisband, Australia

Acceptance Rates

ACSW '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 96 submissions, 51%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 204 of 424 submissions, 48%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Analysing, Representing and Classifying Neuroscience Questions Using OntologiesBrain Informatics10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_24(257-266)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Resolving Neuroscience Questions Using Ontologies and TemplatesBrain Informatics10.1007/978-3-030-59277-6_13(141-150)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media