Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3160504.3160544acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Here's What I Can Do: Chatbots' Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users

Published: 23 October 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Chatbots have been around since the 1960's, but recently they have risen in popularity especially due to new compatibility with social networks and messenger applications. Chatbots are different from traditional user interfaces, for they unveil themselves to the user one sentence at a time. Because of that, users may struggle to interact with them and to understand what they can do. Hence, it is important to support designers in deciding how to convey chatbots' features to users, as this might determine whether the user continues to chat or not. As a first step in this direction, in this paper our goal is to analyze the communicative strategies that have been used by popular chatbots to convey their features to users. To perform this analysis we use the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM). As a result we identify and discuss the different strategies used by the analyzed chatbots to present their features to users. We also discuss the challenges and limitations of using SIM on such interfaces.

References

[1]
Luis F. H. Bento, Raquel O. Prates, and Luiz Chaimowicz. 2009. Using Semiotic Inspection Method to Evaluate a Human-Robot Interface. In 2009 Latin American Web Congress. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 77--84.
[2]
Daniel G. Bobrow. 1964. Natural Language Input for a Computer Problem Solving System. Technical Report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[3]
Heloisa Candello and Claudio Pinhanez. 2016. Designing Conversational Interfaces. In Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais - IHC 2016 (15 ed.). Vol. Parte C - Livro dos Tutoriais. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
[4]
Heloisa Candello, Claudio Pinhanez, and Flavio Figueiredo. 2017. Typefaces and the Perception of Humanness in Natural Language Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3476--3487.
[5]
Luiz P. D. Corrêa, Flávio R. S. Coutinho, Raquel O. Prates, and Luiz Chaimowicz. 2012. Uso Do MIS Para Avaliar Signos Sonoros: Quando Um Problema De Comunicabilidade Se Torna Um Problema De Acessibilidade. In Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '12). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 47--56. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2393536.2393543
[6]
Soraia de S. Reis and Raquel O. Prates. 2011. Applicability of the Semiotic Inspection Method: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 177--186. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2254436.2254468
[7]
Clarisse S. de Souza. 2005. The Semiotic Engineering of Human-computer Interaction. MIT Press.
[8]
Clarisse S. de Souza, Carla F. Leitão, Raquel O. Prates, and Elton J. da Silva. 2006. The Semiotic Inspection Method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 148--157.
[9]
Clarisse S. de Souza and Carla F. Leitão. 2009. Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA, USA. 1--122 pages.
[10]
Clarisse S. de Souza, Carla F. Leitão, Raquel O. Prates, Sílvia A. Bim, and Elton J. da Silva. 2010. Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1-2 (Jan. 2010), 22--40.
[11]
Jiepu Jiang, Ahmed H. Awadallah, Rosie Jones, Umut Ozertem, Imed Zitouni, Ranjitha G. Kulkarni, and Omar Z. Khan. 2015. Automatic Online Evaluation of Intelligent Assistants. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 506--516.
[12]
Michael McTear, Zoraida Callejas, and David Griol. 2016. Evaluating the Conversational Interface. In The Conversational Interface. Springer International Publishing, 379--402.
[13]
Nicole M. Radziwill and Morgan C. Benton. 2017. Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents. arXiv:1704.04579 {cs} (April 2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04579
[14]
Francisco A. M. Valério, Tatiane G. Guimarães, and Raquel O. Prates. 2016. Strategies for Encouraging Sharing in Social Networks for Professionals. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems (IHC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 54:1--54:4.
[15]
Marilyn A. Walker, Diane J. Litman, Candace A. Kamm, and Alicia Abella. 1997. PARADISE: A Framework for Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Agents. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL '97). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 271--280.
[16]
Joseph Weizenbaum. 1966. ELIZA --- A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine. Commun. ACM 9, 1 (Jan. 1966), 36--45.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Lessons Learned from Modeling the Interaction with Conversational AgentsInteraction Design and Architecture(s)10.55612/s-5002-055-007(139-173)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Chatbot usability scale: Adaptation to turkish and validation/reliability analysisi-manager's Journal of Educational Technology10.26634/jet.20.1.1975820:1(11)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Fake it and Let Them Make it: Combining Wizard-of-Oz and Rapid Prototyping Tools for a Holistic Co-Design of Conversational User InterfacesProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202310.1145/3603555.3608549(482-486)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Here's What I Can Do: Chatbots' Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IHC '17: Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    October 2017
    622 pages
    ISBN:9781450363778
    DOI:10.1145/3160504
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    • UDESC: Santa Catarina State University
    • Springer
    • SBC: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação
    • ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
    • UFSCar: Federal University of São Carlos
    • CAPES: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
    • UFPR: Universidade Federal do Paraná
    • CNPq: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecn
    • CGIBR: Comite Gestor da Internet no Brazil
    • OU: The Open University

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 October 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Chatbot
    2. Conversational Interfaces
    3. Evaluation
    4. Semiotic Engineering
    5. Semiotic Inspection Method

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    IHC 2017

    Acceptance Rates

    IHC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 66 of 184 submissions, 36%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)57
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Lessons Learned from Modeling the Interaction with Conversational AgentsInteraction Design and Architecture(s)10.55612/s-5002-055-007(139-173)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Chatbot usability scale: Adaptation to turkish and validation/reliability analysisi-manager's Journal of Educational Technology10.26634/jet.20.1.1975820:1(11)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Fake it and Let Them Make it: Combining Wizard-of-Oz and Rapid Prototyping Tools for a Holistic Co-Design of Conversational User InterfacesProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202310.1145/3603555.3608549(482-486)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2023
    • (2022)Extended UTAUT model to analyze the acceptance of virtual assistant’s recommendations using interactive visualisationsProceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3531073.3531129(1-5)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Exploring challenges for Conversational Web Browsing with Blind and Visually Impaired UsersExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491101.3519832(1-7)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
    • (2022)A Conversation-Driven Approach for Chatbot ManagementIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.314332310(8474-8486)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)A Framework and Content Analysis of Social Cues in the Introductions of Customer Service ChatbotsChatbot Research and Design10.1007/978-3-031-25581-6_8(118-133)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Interacting with the News Through Voice User InterfacesChatbot Research and Design10.1007/978-3-031-25581-6_2(18-33)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2022
    • (2021)Building game-playing chatbots using IBM watson assistantProceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering10.5555/3507788.3507840(282-283)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2021
    • (2021)Time to Get Conversational: Assessment of the Potential of Conversational User Interfaces for Mobile BankingProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202110.1145/3473856.3473872(34-43)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media