Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154925acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The toronto rehab stroke pose dataset to detect compensation during stroke rehabilitation therapy

Published: 23 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Stroke often leads to upper limb movement impairments. To accommodate new constraints, movement patterns are sometimes altered by stroke survivors to use stronger or unaffected joints and muscles. If used during rehabilitation exercises, however, such compensatory motions may result in ineffective outcomes. A system that can automatically detect compensatory motions would be useful in coaching stroke survivors to use proper positioning. Towards the development of such an automated tool, we present a dataset of clinically relevant motions during robotic rehabilitation exercises. The dataset is captured with a Microsoft Kinect sensor and contains two groups of participants -- 10 healthy and 9 stroke survivors - performing a series of seated motions using an upper-limb rehabilitation robot. Healthy participants performed additional sets of scripted motions to simulate common post-stroke compensatory movements. The dataset also includes common clinical assessment scores. Compensatory motions of both healthy and stroke participants were annotated by two experts and are included in the dataset. We also present a preliminary evaluation of the dataset in terms of its sensitivity and specificity in detecting compensatory movements for selected tasks. This dataset is valuable because it includes clinically relevant motions in a clinical setting using a cost-effective, portable, and convenient sensor.

References

[1]
Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S. and Steglind, S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine, 7, 1 (1974), 13--31.
[2]
Gowland, C., Stratford, P., Ward, M., Moreland, J., Torresin, W., VanHullenaar, S., Sanford, J., Barreca, S., Vanspall, B. and Plews, N. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessement. Stroke, 24, 1 (1993), 58--63.
[3]
Fasoli, S. E., Krebs, H. I., Stein, J., Frontera, W. R. and Hogan, N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 84, 4 (2003), 477--482.
[4]
Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kugler, J. and Elsner, B. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. The Cochrane Library (2015).
[5]
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J. and Krebs, H. I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (2007).
[6]
Takeuchi, N. and Izumi, S.-I. Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity. Stroke research and treatment, 2013 (2013).
[7]
Taati, B., Wang, R., Huq, R., Snoek, J. and Mihailidis, A. Vision-based posture assessment to detect and categorize compensation during robotic rehabilitation therapy. IEEE, City, 2012.
[8]
Sigal, L., Balan, A. O. and Black, M. J. Humaneva: Synchronized video and motion capture dataset and baseline algorithm for evaluation of articulated human motion. International journal of computer vision, 87, 1--2 (2010), 4.
[9]
MoCap, C. The data used in this project was obtained from mocap. cs. cmu. edu. the database was created with funding from nsf eia-0196217. City, 2003.
[10]
Müller, M., Röder, T., Clausen, M., Eberhardt, B., Krüger, B. and Weber, A. Documentation mocap database hdm05 (2007).
[11]
Hagler, S., Austin, D., Hayes, T. L., Kaye, J. and Pavel, M. Unobtrusive and ubiquitous in-home monitoring: A methodology for continuous assessment of gait velocity in elders. IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering, 57, 4 (2010), 813--820.
[12]
Yoo, J.-H. and Nixon, M. S. Automated markerless analysis of human gait motion for recognition and classification. Etri Journal, 33, 2 (2011), 259--266.
[13]
Clark, R. A., Pua, Y.-H., Fortin, K., Ritchie, C., Webster, K. E., Denehy, L. and Bryant, A. L. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait & posture, 36, 3 (2012), 372--377.
[14]
Stone, E. and Skubic, M. Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 3, 4 (2011), 349--361.
[15]
Yang, Y., Pu, F., Li, Y., Li, S., Fan, Y. and Li, D. Reliability and validity of Kinect RGB-D sensor for assessing standing balance. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14, 5 (2014), 1633--1638.
[16]
Dolatabadi, E., Taati, B. and Mihailidis, A. Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for Windows v2 for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters. Medical Engineering & Physics, 38, 9 (2016), 952--958.
[17]
Xia, L., Chen, C.-C. and Aggarwal, J. View invariant human action recognition using histograms of 3d joints. IEEE, City, 2012.
[18]
Koppula, H. S., Gupta, R. and Saxena, A. Learning human activities and object affordances from rgb-d videos. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 32, 8 (2013), 951--970.
[19]
Leightley, D., Yap, M. H., Coulson, J., Barnouin, Y. and McPhee, J. S. Benchmarking human motion analysis using Kinect One: an open source dataset. IEEE, City, 2015.
[20]
Podsiadlo, D. and Richardson, S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American geriatrics Society, 39, 2 (1991), 142--148.
[21]
Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E. M., Ferrucci, L., Glynn, R. J., Berkman, L. F., Blazer, D. G., Scherr, P. A. and Wallace, R. B. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. Journal of gerontology, 49, 2 (1994), M85--M94.
[22]
Lu, E. C., Wang, R., Huq, R., Gardner, D., Karam, P., Zabjek, K., Hébert, D., Boger, J. and Mihailidis, A. Development of a robotic device for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: A user-centered design approach. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 2, 4 (2011), 176--184.
[23]
Parra-Dominguez, G. S., Taati, B. and Mihailidis, A. 3D human motion analysis to detect abnormal events on stairs. IEEE, City, 2012.
[24]
Dolatabadi, E., Taati, B. and Mihailidis, A. Vision-based approach for long-term mobility monitoring: Single case study following total hip replacement. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 51, 7 (2014).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Application of Artificial Neuromolecular System in Robotic Arm Control to Assist Progressive Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Stroke PatientsActuators10.3390/act1309036213:9(362)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Virtual Analysis for Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationThe Open Biomedical Engineering Journal10.2174/011874120730516124042211360418:1Online publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2024)A Medical Low-Back Pain Physical Rehabilitation Database for Human Body Movement Analysis2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)10.1109/IJCNN60899.2024.10650036(1-8)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
May 2017
503 pages
ISBN:9781450363631
DOI:10.1145/3154862
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 May 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Kinect
  2. automated coaching
  3. benchmarking
  4. compensatory movements
  5. stroke rehabilitation
  6. upper body motion

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

PervasiveHealth '17

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)74
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Application of Artificial Neuromolecular System in Robotic Arm Control to Assist Progressive Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Stroke PatientsActuators10.3390/act1309036213:9(362)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Virtual Analysis for Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationThe Open Biomedical Engineering Journal10.2174/011874120730516124042211360418:1Online publication date: 16-May-2024
  • (2024)A Medical Low-Back Pain Physical Rehabilitation Database for Human Body Movement Analysis2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)10.1109/IJCNN60899.2024.10650036(1-8)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Accurate Body Pose Matching for Individuals with Stroke using Siamese Networks2024 IEEE/ACM Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE)10.1109/CHASE60773.2024.00030(177-181)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
  • (2024)An efficient and lightweight multiperson activity recognition framework for robot-assisted healthcare applicationsExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122482241(122482)Online publication date: May-2024
  • (2024)Promoting fairness in activity recognition algorithms for patient’s monitoring and evaluation systems in healthcareComputers in Biology and Medicine10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108826179(108826)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • (2024)Modeling rehabilitation dataset to implement effective AI assistive systemsDiscover Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s44163-024-00130-74:1Online publication date: 28-May-2024
  • (2023)UCO Physical Rehabilitation: New Dataset and Study of Human Pose Estimation Methods on Physical Rehabilitation ExercisesSensors10.3390/s2321886223:21(8862)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Online detection of compensatory strategies in human movement with supervised classification: a pilot studyFrontiers in Neurorobotics10.3389/fnbot.2023.115582617Online publication date: 14-Jul-2023
  • (2023)AI-Driven Stroke Rehabilitation Systems and Assessment: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering10.1109/TNSRE.2022.321908531(192-207)Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media