Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3151470.3151471acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesclihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

UUX-Posts: a tool for extracting and classifying postings related to the use of a system

Published: 08 November 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Systems Evaluation through user narratives has been a recent evaluation technique and has seen valuable results on a usability and user experience about the system. In previous work, we have researched as a user writes detailed comments about the system itself where it is online and use us to evaluate the system. However, the process of collecting and sorting user posts has become a laborious process. In this way, this article presents the UUX-Posts - A tool for extracting and classifying posts about the uses of a certain system by its users. This work contributes to UUX tests, which aim to identify Usability and UX problems by analyzing user opinions (by text).

References

[1]
Ariello, G. E.; Kaestner, C. A. A. Tratamento de textos e algoritmos sobre grafos para a análise de redes sociais. In: Seminário de Iniciação Científica e Tecnológica da UTFPR, Curitiba, 2017.
[2]
Bargas-avila, Javier A.; Hornbæk, Kasper. Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In CHI 2011, Vancouver, p. 2689--2698, 2011.
[3]
Benamara, F., Cesarano, C., Picariello, A. and Reforgiato, D. 2007. Sentiment analysis: adjectives and adverbs are better than adjectives alone. In ICWMS 2007, Boulder, CO USA, p. 1--7, 2007.
[4]
Bevan, N. 2009. What is the difference between the purpose of usability and user experience evaluation methods? In UXEM'09, INTERACT 2009, Uppsala, Sweden, p. 24--28, 2009.
[5]
Diakopoulos, N.; Naaman, M.; Kivran-Swaine, F. Diamonds in the Rough: Social Media Visual Analytics for Journalistic Inquiry. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, October 24-29, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2010
[6]
Elmasri, R; Navathe, S., B. Fundamentals of database systems. 6a Ed., 2011.
[7]
Freitas, L.; Silva, T.; Mendes,. M. Avaliação do Spotify -- uma experiência de avaliação textual utilizando a metodologia MALTU. In IHC 2016, São Paulo, Brazil (2016)
[8]
Gaizauskas, R. e Wilks, Y. Information extraction: beyond document retrieval. In Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, vol.3, no.2, 17--60, 1998.
[9]
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N. 2006. User experience - a research agenda, Behaviour & Information Technology. In Behaviour & Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Group content, p. 91--97, 2011.
[10]
Hedegaard, S.; Simonsen, J. G. Extracting Usability and User Experience Information from Online User Reviews. In: CHI: Changing Perspectives, Paris, 2013.
[11]
Imran et al. Extracting Information Nuggets from Disaster-Related Messages in Social Media. In: International ISCRAM Conference, 10, Baden-Baden, 2013.
[12]
ISO DIS 9241 - 210:2008. Ergonomics of human system interaction - Part 210: Human -centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407).
[13]
Ketola, Pekka; Roto, Virpi. Exploring user experience measurement needs. 5th COST294-MAUSE Open Workshop on Valid Useful User Experience Measurement, 2008.
[14]
Korhonen, Hannu; Arrasvuori, Juha; Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, Kaisa. Let users tell the story. In CHI 2010, The ACM Press, Atlanta, p. 4051--4056, 2010.
[15]
Mendes, M. S.: MALTU - Model for evaluation of interaction in social systems from the Users Textual Language. 200 f. Thesis (PhD in computer science) -- Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, CE -- Brazil (2015)
[16]
Mendes, M., Furtado, E., Castro, M. F.: Do users write about the system in use? An investigation from messages in Natural Language on Twitter. In 7th Euro American Association on Telematics and Information Systems (2014)
[17]
Mendes, M. S.; Furtado, E. S.; Castro, M. F. Do users write about the system in use? An investigation from messages in Natural Language on Twitter. 7th Euro American Association on Telematics and Information Systems (EATIS 2014), Valparaiso, Chile (2014)
[18]
Silva, T.; Freitas, L.; Mendes,. M. Além das avaliações tradicionais: a visão dos usuários nas lojas de aplicativos. In IHC 2017, Joinville, Brazil (2017)
[19]
Mendes, M. S.; Furtado, E. S.; Furtado, V.; Castro, M. F. Investigating Usability and User Experience from the user postings in Social Systems. In HCI International, (2015)
[20]
Mendes, M., Furtado, E., Theophilo, F., Castro, M. F.: A Study about the usability evaluation of Social Systems from messages in Natural Language. In CLIHC 2013 (2013).
[21]
Olsson, T.; Salo, M. Narratives of satisfying and unsatisfying experiences of current mobile augmented reality applications. In CHI 2012, The ACM Press, p. 2779--2788, 2012.
[22]
Partala, T.; Kallinen, A. Understanding the most satisfying and unsatisfying user experiences: Emotions, psychological needs, and context. In Interacting with Computers 24, p. 25--34, 2012
[23]
Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp,H. 2002. Interaction design:Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley.
[24]
Taboada, M.; Brooke, J.; Tofiloski, M.; Voll, K.; Stede, M. Lexicon-basedmethods for sentiment analysis. In Association for Computational Linguistics, v. 37, n. 2, 2011.
[25]
Tuch, A. N., Trusell, R. N., And Hornbæk, K.: Analyzing Users' Narratives to Understand Experience with Interactive Products. In CHI 2013, The ACM Press, p. 2079--2088, 2013.
[26]
Lima, A. M. S., Silva, P. B. S., Cruz, L. A., Mendes, M. S. Investigating the polarity of user postings in a Social System. HCII 2017.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Professionals' Perceptions of the Interaction between User Experience and Machine LearningProceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems10.1145/3658271.3658341(1-9)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • (2020)ML for UX? - An Inventory and Predictions on the Use of Machine Learning Techniques for UX ResearchProceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society10.1145/3419249.3420163(1-11)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2020
  • (2020)An Analysis of UX Based on Users’ Emotional Intention and Values, Both Expressed Through Twitter PostsSoftware Ecosystems, Sustainability and Human Values in the Social Web10.1007/978-3-030-46130-0_5(79-98)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. UUX-Posts: a tool for extracting and classifying postings related to the use of a system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CLIHC '17: Proceedings of the 8th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 2017
    136 pages
    ISBN:9781450354295
    DOI:10.1145/3151470
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 November 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Extraction of Postings
    2. Postings Related to the Use (PRUs)
    3. Social Systems
    4. Textual evaluation
    5. Usability
    6. User eXperience

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CLIHC '17
    CLIHC '17: 8th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    November 8 - 10, 2017
    Antigua Guatemala, Guatemala

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 14 of 42 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Professionals' Perceptions of the Interaction between User Experience and Machine LearningProceedings of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems10.1145/3658271.3658341(1-9)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
    • (2020)ML for UX? - An Inventory and Predictions on the Use of Machine Learning Techniques for UX ResearchProceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society10.1145/3419249.3420163(1-11)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2020
    • (2020)An Analysis of UX Based on Users’ Emotional Intention and Values, Both Expressed Through Twitter PostsSoftware Ecosystems, Sustainability and Human Values in the Social Web10.1007/978-3-030-46130-0_5(79-98)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Temporal analysis of posts related to useProceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3357155.3358482(1-10)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2019
    • (2019)Enrichment of dictionaries to improve the automatic classification of feelings in postings related to the use of systemsProceedings of the XV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems10.1145/3330204.3330219(1-8)Online publication date: 20-May-2019
    • (2019)Which Instrument Should I Use? Supporting Decision-Making About the Evaluation of User ExperienceDesign, User Experience, and Usability. Practice and Case Studies10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_4(49-67)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
    • (2018)An Experience of Textual Evaluation Using the MALTU MethodologySocial Computing and Social Media. Technologies and Analytics10.1007/978-3-319-91485-5_18(236-246)Online publication date: 31-May-2018
    • (2017)Beyond traditional evaluationsProceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3160504.3160548(1-10)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media