Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3035918.3064038acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Distance Oracle on Terrain Surface

Published: 09 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Due to the advance of the geo-spatial positioning and the computer graphics technology, digital terrain data become more and more popular nowadays. Query processing on terrain data has attracted considerable attention from both the academic community and the industry community. One fundamental and important query is the shortest distance query and many other applications such as proximity queries (including nearest neighbor queries and range queries), 3D object feature vector construction and 3D object data mining are built based on the result of the shortest distance query. In this paper, we study the shortest distance query which is to find the shortest distance between a point-of-interest and another point-of-interest on the surface of the terrain due to a variety of applications. As observed by existing studies, computing the exact shortest distance is very expensive. Some existing studies proposed ε-approximate distance oracles where ε is a non-negative real number and is an error parameter. However, the best-known algorithm has a large oracle construction time, a large oracle size and a large distance query time. Motivated by this, we propose a novel ε-approximate distance oracle called the Space Efficient distance oracle (SE) which has a small oracle construction time, a small oracle size and a small distance query time due to its compactness storing concise information about pairwise distances between any two points-of-interest. Our experimental results show that the oracle construction time, the oracle size and the distance query time of SE are up to two orders of magnitude, up to 3 orders of magnitude and up to 5 orders of magnitude faster than the best-known algorithm.

References

[1]
A. Al-Badarneh, H. Najadat, and A. Alraziqi. A classifier to detect tumor disease in mri brain images. In ASONAM, 2012.
[2]
L. Aleksandrov, H. N. Djidjev, H. Guo, A. Maheshwari, D. Nussbaum, and J.-R. Sack. Algorithms for approximate shortest path queries on weighted polyhedral surfaces. In Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2010.
[3]
L. Aleksandrov, A. Maheshwari, and J.-R. Sack. Determining approximate shortest paths on weighted polyhedral surfaces. JACM, 2005.
[4]
A. Beygelzimer, S. Kakade, and J. Langford. Cover trees for nearest neighbor. In ICML, 2006.
[5]
P. B. Callahan and S. R. Kosaraju. A decomposition of multidimensional point sets with applications to k-nearest-neighbors and n-body potential fields. JACM, 1995.
[6]
J. Chen and Y. Han. Shortest paths on a polyhedron. In SOCG, 1990.
[7]
T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein. Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press and McGraw-Hill, 3rd edition, 2009.
[8]
K. Deng, H. T. Shen, K. Xu, and X. Lin. Surface k-nn query processing. In ICDE, 2006.
[9]
K. Deng and X. Zhou. Expansion-based algorithms for finding single pair shortest path on surface. In WWGIS. 2005.
[10]
K. Deng, X. Zhou, H. T. Shen, Q. Liu, K. Xu, and X. Lin. A multi-resolution surface distance model for k-nn query processing. VLDBJ, 2008.
[11]
B. G. Dickson and P. Beier. Quantifying the influence of topographic position on cougar (puma concolor) movement in southern california, usa. Journal of Zoology, 2007.
[12]
H. N. Djidjev and C. Sommer. Approximate distance queries for weighted polyhedral surfaces. In ESA. 2011.
[13]
M. Fan, H. Qiao, and B. Zhang. Intrinsic dimension estimation of manifolds by incising balls. Pattern Recognition, 2009.
[14]
J. Fischer and S. Har-Peled. Dynamic well-separated pair decomposition made easy. In CCCG, 2005.
[15]
F. Fodor. The densest packing of 12 congruent circles in a circle. Contributions to Algebra and Geometry, 2000.
[16]
J. Golay and M. Kanevski. A new estimator of intrinsic dimension based on the multipoint morisita index. Pattern Recognition, 2015.
[17]
S. A. Huettel, A. W. Song, and G. McCarthy. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. In Sinauer Associates, 2004.
[18]
T. Kanai and H. Suzuki. Approximate shortest path on a polyhedral surface based on selective refinement of the discrete graph and its applications. In GMPTA, 2000.
[19]
M. Kaul, R. C.-W. Wong, and C. S. Jensen. New lower and upper bounds for shortest distance queries on terrains. VLDB, 2015.
[20]
M. Kaul, R. C.-W. Wong, B. Yang, and C. S. Jensen. Finding shortest paths on terrains by killing two birds with one stone. VLDB, 2013.
[21]
B. Kégl. Intrinsic dimension estimation using packing numbers. In NIPS, 2002.
[22]
M. Kortgen, G. J. Park, M. Novotni, and R. Klei. 3d shape matching with 3d shape contexts. In CESCG, 2003.
[23]
J.-F. Lalonde, N. Vandapel, D. F. Huber, and M. Hebert. Natural terrain classification using three-dimensional ladar data for ground robot mobility. Journal of field robotics, 2006.
[24]
L. Liu and R. C.-W. Wong. Finding shortest path on land surface. In SIGMOD, 2011.
[25]
A. Mårell, J. P. Ball, and A. Hofgaard. Foraging and movement paths of female reindeer: insights from fractal analysis, correlated random walks, and lévy flights. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2002.
[26]
J. S. Mitchell, D. M. Mount, and C. H. Papadimitriou. The discrete geodesic problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 1987.
[27]
J. Sankaranarayanan and H. Samet. Distance oracles for spatial networks. In ICDE, 2009.
[28]
L. T. Sarjakoski, P. Kettunen, H.-M. Flink, M. Laakso, M. Rönneberg, and T. Sarjakoski. Analysis of verbal route descriptions and landmarks for hiking. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2012.
[29]
C. Shahabi, L.-A. Tang, and S. Xing. Indexing land surface for efficient knn query. VLDB, 2008.
[30]
J. Shotton, J. Winn, C. Rother, and A. Criminisi. Textonboost: Joint appearance, shape and context modeling for multi-class object recognition and segmentation. In ECCV, 2006.
[31]
F. Tauheed, L. Biveinis, T. Heinis, F. Schurmann, H. Markram, and A. Ailamaki. Accelerating range queries for brain simulations. In ICDE, 2012.
[32]
N. Vandapel, R. R. Donamukkala, and M. Hebert. Unmanned ground vehicle navigation using aerial ladar data. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2006.
[33]
V. J. Wei, R. C.-W. Wong, C. Long, and D. M. Mount. Distance oracle on terrain surface (technical report). In http://www.cse.ust.hk/~raywong/paper/distanceOracle-technical.pdf.
[34]
S.-Q. Xin and G.-J. Wang. Improving chen and han's algorithm on the discrete geodesic problem. ACM Trans. Graph., 2009.
[35]
S. Xing, C. Shahabi, and B. Pan. Continuous monitoring of nearest neighbors on land surface. In VLDB, 2009.
[36]
D. Yan, Z. Zhao, and W. Ng. Monochromatic and bichromatic reverse nearest neighbor queries on land surfaces. In CIKM, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Efficient Shortest Path Queries on 3D Weighted Terrain Surfaces for Moving Objects2024 25th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)10.1109/MDM61037.2024.00023(11-20)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • (2021)Path advisorProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3476311.347631914:12(2683-2686)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Spatial Skyline Queries on Triangulated Irregular NetworksProceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases10.1145/3469830.3470901(64-73)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGMOD '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data
May 2017
1810 pages
ISBN:9781450341974
DOI:10.1145/3035918
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 May 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. shortest distance queries
  2. spatial database
  3. terrain

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGMOD/PODS'17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Efficient Shortest Path Queries on 3D Weighted Terrain Surfaces for Moving Objects2024 25th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)10.1109/MDM61037.2024.00023(11-20)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • (2021)Path advisorProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3476311.347631914:12(2683-2686)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Spatial Skyline Queries on Triangulated Irregular NetworksProceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases10.1145/3469830.3470901(64-73)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2021

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media