Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3015166.3015178acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicspsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Novel Training Sample Selection Methods for SR-STAP

Published: 21 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Space-time adaptive processing based on clutter sparse recovery (SR-STAP) method has attracted considerable attention due to its superiority in severe heterogeneous environments. To ensure good clutter suppression performance, training samples should share similar clutter statistic property with the tested sample. This paper proposes two training sample selection methods for SR-STAP which adopt geometrical distances including Euclidean distance and Riemannian distance to measure the clutter similarity. The interference covariance matrices in these distances are estimated using the sparse recovery theory so as to take the clutter sparse property into consideration. Samples whose distances are smallest are selected as appropriate training samples. Numerical results based on publicly available Mountain Top measured data validate the effectiveness of these proposed methods.

References

[1]
Ward, J. 1994. Space-time adaptive processing for airborne radar, MIT Lincoln Laboratory.
[2]
Klemm, R. 2004. Principles of Space-Time Adaptive Processing, London, UK: The Institution of Electrical Engineers.
[3]
Reed, I.S., Mallett, J.D., and Brennan, L.E. 1974. Rapid convergence rate in adaptive arrays. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 853--863.
[4]
Melvin, W.L. 2000. Space-time adaptive radar performance in heterogeneous clutter. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 621--633.
[5]
Sun, K., Zhang, H., Li, G., Meng, H., and Wang, X. 2009. A novel STAP algorithm using sparse recovery technique. In proceedings of IGASS: 336--339.
[6]
Yang, Z., Li, X., Wang, H., and Jiang, W. 2013. On clutter sparsity analysis in space-time adaptive processing airborne radar. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 1214--1218.
[7]
Sen, S. 2013. OFDM radar space-time adaptive processing by exploiting spatio-temporal sparsity. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 118--130.
[8]
Needell, D., and Tropp, J. A. 2008. CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples. Applied Computational Harmonic Analysis, 301--321.
[9]
Tropp, J. A. and Gilbert, A. C. 2007. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 4655--4666.
[10]
Beck, A., and Teboulle, M. 2009. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 183--202.
[11]
Wu, Y., Wang, T., Wu, J., and Duan, J. 2015. Training sample selection for space-time adaptive processing in heterogeneous environments. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 691--695.
[12]
Titi, G.W., and Marshall, D.F. 1996. The ARPA/NAVY Mountaintop Program: adaptive signal processing for airborne early warning radar. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Atlanta, Georgia, 1996) 1165--1168.

Cited By

View all
  1. Novel Training Sample Selection Methods for SR-STAP

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICSPS 2016: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Signal Processing Systems
    November 2016
    235 pages
    ISBN:9781450347907
    DOI:10.1145/3015166
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 November 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Euclidean distance
    2. Riemannian distance
    3. SR-STAP
    4. Training sample selection
    5. sparse recovery

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICSPS 2016

    Acceptance Rates

    ICSPS 2016 Paper Acceptance Rate 46 of 83 submissions, 55%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 46 of 83 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media