Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3098279.3098554acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Influence of letter size on word reading performance during walking

Published: 04 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Mobile devices like smartphones facilitate parallel activities of IT-interaction and other tasks. Especially smartphone usage during walking can often be observed. This can lead to distracted walking which frequently results in serious consequences for the user and others. As people will probably go on using mobile devices in this way, e.g., for navigation, we have to provide interaction interfaces which are adapted to the special needs of secondary usage while walking. One way to adapt apps to walking is to reduce time for content perception. A substantial part of content is given in written language, and therefore, reading is of high importance. Based on this, we pursued the reduction of reading time on a mobile device during walking.
We conducted a study which provides information about the minimum acceptable letter sizes for reading single words while walking. We carried out an experiment in which we combined short presentation times of commonly used words with different letter sizes and analyzed the outcome by means of psychometric functions. We administered these functions for the independent variables presentation time, walking speed vs. standing and length of words (number of letters) and analyzed the outcome statistically in respect to the minimal visual angle. We found highly significant influences of all three conditions on the legibility of the words. We recommend the adaptation of applications for walking according to our findings.

References

[1]
Ipsos: Distracted Walking Study. 2015. Topline Summary Findings. http://www.anationinmotion.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/AAOS-Distracted-Walking-Topline-11-30-15.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2016.
[2]
J.L. Nasar and D. Troyer. 2013. Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis & Prevention.
[3]
J. Perry, J. Burnfield, and L. Cabico. 201. Gait analysis. Normal and pathological function. Slack Inc., Thorofare, NJ.
[4]
T. Pozzo, A. Berthoz, and L. Lefort. 1990. Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans. Exp Brain Res.
[5]
G.E. Grossman, R.J. Leigh, E.N. Bruce, W.P. Huebner, and D.J. Lanska. 1989. Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion. J Neurophysiol 62(1), 264--272.
[6]
J.W. Miller, and E.J. Ludvigh. 1962. The effect of dynamic visual acuity. Survey of Ophthalmology(1), 83--116.
[7]
B. Brown. 1972. Dynamic visual acuity, eye movements and peripheral acuity for moving targets. Vision research 12(2), 305--321.
[8]
A. Burg. 1966. Visual acuity as measured by dynamic and static tests: a comparative evaluation. J Appl Psychol 50(6), 460--466.
[9]
E.J. Hillmann and J.J. Bloomberg. 1999. Dynamic visual acuity while walking in normals and labyrinthe-deficient patiens. Journal of Vestibular Research(9), 49--57.
[10]
B.T. Peters and J.J. Bloomberg. 2005. Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets. Acta Otolaryngol.
[11]
ISO 8596. 2009. Ophthalmic optics - Visual acuity testing - Standard optotype and its presentation. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
[12]
J. Conradi and T. Alexander. 2014. Analysis of Visual Performance during the Use of Mobile Devices While Walking. In: Hutchison, D., Kanade, T., Kittler, J., Kleinberg, J.M., Kobsa, A., Mattern, F., Mitchell, J.C., Naor, M., Nierstrasz, O., Pandu Rangan, C., Steffen, B., Terzopoulos, D., Tygar, D., Weikum, G., Harris, D. (eds.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, vol. 8532. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 133--142. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
[13]
M.A. Tinker and D.G. Paterson. 1929. Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading. III. Length of line. Journal of Applied Psychology.
[14]
S.L. Smith. 1979. Letter Size and Legibility. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
[15]
J. Banerjee, D. Majumdar, M.S. Pal, and D. Majumdar. 2011. Readability, Subjective Preference and Mental Workload Studies on Young Indian Adults for Selection of Optimum Font Type and Size during Onscreen Reading. Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences 4(2), 131--143.
[16]
M. Bernard and M. Mills. 2000. So, what size and type of font should I use on my website. Usability news(2.2), 1--5.
[17]
C.A. Sanchez and J.Z. Goolsbee. 2010. Character size and reading to remember from small displays. Computers & Education.
[18]
I. Darroch, J. Goodman, S. Brewster, and P. Gray. 2005. The Effect of Age and Font Size on Reading Text on Handheld Computers. In: Costabile, M., Paterno, F. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2005, vol. 3585. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 253--266. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[19]
K. Babaria, A.S. Giacoppo, and U. Kuter. 2001, Single Item Search and Selection in Handheld Devices: a Pilot Study on the Effects of Font Size and Menu Design. http://www.cs.umd.edu/class/fall2001/cmsc838s/rust.doc. Accessed 27 November 2015
[20]
A.W. Inhoff and K. Rayner. 1996. Das Blickverhalten beim Lesen. In: Guenther, H., Ludwig, O. (eds.) Schrift und Schriftlichkeit (Writing and Its Use). Ein Interdisziplinaeres Handbuch Internationaler Forschung - An Interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research. Walter De Gruyter Inc, Berlin, New York.
[21]
K. Forster. 1970. Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics.
[22]
D. Yu, S.-H. Cheung, G.E. Legge, and S.T. Chung. 2007. Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of vision.
[23]
B.G. Tabachnick and L.S. Fidell. 2007: Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston
[24]
ISO 9241-303. 2011. Ergonomics of human-system interaction -- Part 303: Requirements for electronic visual displays. ISO, Geneva.
[25]
DeReWo. 2007. Korpusbasierten Wortgrundformenliste DeReWo v-30000g-2007-12-31-0.1, mit Benutzudokumentation. http://www1.ids-mannheim.de/kl/projekte/methoden/derewo.html. Accessed 2 November 2015.
[26]
D. Yu, H. Park, D. Gerold, G.E. Legge. 2010. Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. Journal of vision.
[27]
P. T. Smith. 1996. Research Methods in the Psychology of Reading. In H. Guenther & O. Ludwig (Eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit (Writing and Its Use). Ein Interdisziplinaeres Handbuch Internationaler Forschung - An Interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research (pp. 932-942). Berlin, New York: Walter De Gruyter Inc.
[28]
H. Levitt. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49(2), 2.
[29]
M. A. Tinker. 1963. Legibility of Print. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
[30]
M. Liebig. 2008. Browser-Typografie. Boizenburg: Hülsbusch.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Research on Chinese Font Size of Automobile Central Control Interface DrivingHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-35908-8_15(210-223)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2021)Design Patterns and Trade‐Offs in Responsive Visualization for CommunicationComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1432140:3(459-470)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2021
  • (2020)The Effect of Context on Small Screen and Wearable Device Users’ Performance - A Systematic ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/338637053:3(1-44)Online publication date: 28-May-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MobileHCI '17: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
September 2017
874 pages
ISBN:9781450350754
DOI:10.1145/3098279
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 September 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. distracted walking
  2. interface design
  3. letter size
  4. mobile devices
  5. reading
  6. words

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MobileHCI '17
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

MobileHCI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 224 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Research on Chinese Font Size of Automobile Central Control Interface DrivingHCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems10.1007/978-3-031-35908-8_15(210-223)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2021)Design Patterns and Trade‐Offs in Responsive Visualization for CommunicationComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1432140:3(459-470)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2021
  • (2020)The Effect of Context on Small Screen and Wearable Device Users’ Performance - A Systematic ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/338637053:3(1-44)Online publication date: 28-May-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media