Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/3097286.3097290acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Study of Tweet Veracity to Separate Rumours from Counter-Rumours

Published: 28 July 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Rumours are known to propagate easily through computer-mediated communication channels such as Twitter. Their outbreak is often followed by the spread of 'counter-rumours', which are messages that debunk rumours. The probability of a tweet to be a counter-rumour is referred to as 'tweet veracity' in this paper. Since both rumours and counter-rumours are expected to contain claims of truth, the two might not be easily distinguishable. If Internet users fail to separate rumours from counter-rumours, the latter will not serve its purpose. Hence, this paper investigates the extent to which tweet veracity could be predicted by content as well as contributors' profile. The investigation focuses on the death hoax case of Singapore's first Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew on Twitter. A total of 1,000 tweets (500 rumours + 500 counter-rumours) are analyzed using binomial logistic regression. Results indicate that tweet veracity could be predicted by clarity, proper nouns, visual cues, references to credible sources, as well as contributors' duration of membership, and number of followers. The significance of these findings are highlighted.

References

[1]
Au-Yong, R. 2015. Fresh police report lodged against Amos Yee. The Straits Times (17 April 2015). Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/fresh-police-report-lodged-against-amos-yee
[2]
Bordia, P., DiFonzo, N., Haines, R., and Chaseling, E. 2005. Rumors denials as persuasive messages: Effects of personal relevance, source, and message characteristics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 35, 6 (Jun. 2005), 1301--1331.
[3]
Chan, F., and Sim, W. 2015. Police looking into hoax website that falsely announced death of Mr Lee Kuan Yew. The Straits Times (19 March 2015). Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/police-looking-into-hoax-website-that-falsely-announced-death-of-mr-lee-kuan-yew
[4]
Chang, T. K. 1999. Reporting public opinion in Singapore: Journalistic practices and policy implications. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 4, 1 (Jan. 1999), 11--28.
[5]
Cho, H., Chen, M., and Chung, S. 2010. Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61, 6 (Jun. 2010), 1198--1212.
[6]
Chua, A. Y. K., and Banerjee, S. 2016. Linguistic predictors of rumor veracity on the Internet. In Proceedings of the IAENG International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists: International Conference on Internet Computing and Web Services (Hong Kong, March 16-18, 2016). IAENG, Hong Kong, 387--391. Retrieved from http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2016/IMECS2016_pp387-391.pdf
[7]
Chua, A. Y. K., Banerjee, S., Guan, A. H., Xian, L. J., and Peng, P. 2016. Intention to trust and share health-related online rumors: Studying the role of risk propensity. In Proceedings of the IEEE SAI Computing Conference (London, UK, July 13-15, 2016). IEEE, New York, NY, 1136--1139.
[8]
Collier, C. W. 1992. Intellectual authority and institutional authority. Inquiry. 35, 2 (1992), 145--181.
[9]
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., and Cooper, H. 2003. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 1 (Jan. 2003), 74--118.
[10]
DiFonzo, N., and Bordia, P. 2007. Rumor Psychology: Social and Organizational Approaches. American Psychological Association, Washington, WA.
[11]
Doerr, B., Fouz, M., and Friedrich, T. 2011. Social networks spread rumors in sublogarithmic time. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (San Jose, California, USA, June 6-8, 2011). ACM, New York, NY, 21--30.
[12]
Doerr, B., Fouz, M., and Friedrich, T. 2012. Why rumors spread so quickly in social networks. Communications of the ACM. 55, 6 (Jun. 2012), 70--75.
[13]
Edy, J. A., and Risley-Baird, E. E. 2016. Rumor communities: The social dimensions of Internet political misperceptions. Social Science Quarterly. 97, 3 (Jun. 2016), 588--602.
[14]
George, C. 2007. Consolidating authoritarian rule: Calibrated coercion in Singapore. The Pacific Review. 20, 2 (May. 2007), 127--145.
[15]
Glazer, C. 2002. Playing nice with others: The communication of emotion in an online classroom. In Proceedings of the Annual Distance Education Conference (Austin, Texas, USA, January 2002). Retrieved from http://www.scholarlypursuits.com/dec_comm.pdf
[16]
Harrison, J. L. 2016. Trident Health boasts advanced care for women's breast health. Summerville Journal Scene (26 October 2016). Retrieved from http://www.journalscene.com/news/trident-health-boasts-advanced-care-for-women-s-breast-health/article_40ef3214-9480-11e6-a310-1fdd88a6912c.html
[17]
Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M., and Wu, F. 2008. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1313405
[18]
Kendra, J. M., and Wachtendorf, T. 2003. Elements of resilience after the world trade center disaster: Reconstituting New York city's emergency operations centre. Disasters. 27, 1 (Mar. 2003), 37--53.
[19]
Krippendorf, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction of its Methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[20]
Kwon, S., Cha, M., Jung, K., Chen, W., and Wang, Y. 2013. Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (Dallas, Texas, USA, December 7-10, 2013). IEEE, New York, NY, 1103--1108.
[21]
Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33, 1 (Mar. 1977), 159--174.
[22]
Liu, D., and Chen, X. 2011. Rumor propagation in online social networks like Twitter: A simulation study. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security (Shanghai, China, November 4-6, 2011). IEEE, New York, NY, 278--282.
[23]
Ma, W. W., and Chan, A. 2014. Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in Human Behavior. 39 (Oct. 2014), 51--58.
[24]
Matsumura, N., Miura, A., Komori, M., and Hiraishi, K. 2016. Media and sentiments in the Great East Japan Earthquake Related Tweets---Social media as 'Meta Media'. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (Laguna Hills, California, USA, February 4-6, 2016). IEEE, New York, NY, 465--470.
[25]
Oh, O., Agrawal, M., and Rao, H. R. 2013. Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. MIS Quarterly. 37, 2 (Jun. 2013), 407--426. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3100&context=misq
[26]
Ozturk, P., Li, H., and Sakamoto, Y. 2015. Combating rumor spread on social media: The effectiveness of refutation and warning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii, USA, January 5-8, 2015). IEEE, New York, NY, 2406--2414.
[27]
Press, S. J., and Wilson, S. 1978. Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 73, 364 (Dec. 1978), 699--705.
[28]
Rieh, S. Y. 2002. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53, 2 (2002), 145--161.
[29]
Tanaka, Y., Sakamoto, Y., and Matsuka, T. 2013. Toward a social-technological system that inactivates false rumors through the critical thinking of crowds. In Proceedings of the IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii, USA, January 7-10, 2013). IEEE, New York, NY, 649--658.
[30]
Underwood, R. L., and Klein, N. M. 2002. Packaging as brand communication: Effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and brand. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 10, 4 (2002), 58--68.
[31]
Yih, W. T., Goodman, J., Vanderwende, L., and Suzuki, H. 2007. Multi-document summarization by maximizing informative content-words. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Hyderabad, India, January 6-12, 2007), 1776--1782. Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/Papers/IJCAI/2007/IJCAI07-287
[32]
Yulianti, N. K. D., and Hum, S. S. M. 2016. The perfection of interpreting by non-linguist interpreters. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences. 3, 3 (Mar. 2016), 34--41.
[33]
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., and Li, H. 2015. Predictors of the authenticity of Internet health rumours. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 32, 3 (Aug. 2015), 195--205.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Emotional and Mental Nuances and Technological Approaches: Optimising Fact-Check Dissemination through Cognitive Reinforcement TechniqueElectronics10.3390/electronics1301024013:1(240)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2019)Understanding Online Falsehood From the Perspective of Social ProblemHandbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0.ch001(1-17)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2018)Rumors and rumor corrections on Twitter: Studying message characteristics and opinion leadership2018 4th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)10.1109/INFOMAN.2018.8392837(210-214)Online publication date: May-2018

Index Terms

  1. A Study of Tweet Veracity to Separate Rumours from Counter-Rumours

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    #SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society
    July 2017
    414 pages
    ISBN:9781450348478
    DOI:10.1145/3097286
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 July 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Counter-rumour
    2. Twitter
    3. information quality
    4. information veracity
    5. online rumour
    6. user-generated content

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    #SMSociety17

    Acceptance Rates

    #SMSociety17 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 142 submissions, 41%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 78 of 189 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Emotional and Mental Nuances and Technological Approaches: Optimising Fact-Check Dissemination through Cognitive Reinforcement TechniqueElectronics10.3390/electronics1301024013:1(240)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
    • (2019)Understanding Online Falsehood From the Perspective of Social ProblemHandbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0.ch001(1-17)Online publication date: 2019
    • (2018)Rumors and rumor corrections on Twitter: Studying message characteristics and opinion leadership2018 4th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM)10.1109/INFOMAN.2018.8392837(210-214)Online publication date: May-2018

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media