short-paper

Access to Massive Open Online Labs through a MOOC

Authors:

Wissam Halimi,

Christophe Salzmann,

Denis GilletAuthors Info & Claims

L@S '17: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale

Pages 331 - 334

https://doi.org/10.1145/3051457.3054017

Published: 12 April 2017 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Few MOOCs offer laboratory work as part of their educational material, yet it is known that hands-on sessions are important components of science and engineering education. Equally important is understanding how students are using labs as part of their learning activity outside the constraints of space and time. In this work we present the initial results of the usage of a remote lab provided as part of a Control Systems MOOC.

References

[1]

1. MJ. Callaghan, J. Harkin, TM. McGinnity, and LP. Maguire. 2004. Cost Effectiveness Issues in Remote Experimentation. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybemetlcs 5 (2004), 4700--4704.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[2]

Balakrishnan Dasarathy, Kevin Sullivan, Douglas C. Schmidt, Douglas H. Fisher, and Adam Porter. 2014. The Past, Present, and Future of MOOCs and Their Relevance to Software Engineering. FOSE 2014 Proceedings of the on Future of Software Engineering (2014), 212--224.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Erik Duval. 2011. Attention please!: learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In roceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM, 9--17.

Google Scholar

[4]

David Lowe. 2014. MOOLs: Massive Open Online Laboratories: An Analysis of Scale and Feasibility. 2014 11th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV) (2014), 1--6.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

Jeffrey V. Nickersona, James E. Corterb, Sven K. Eschea, and Constantin Chassapisa. 2005. A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education. Computers Education 49(2005), 708--725.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Christophe Salzmann, Denis Gillet, and Yves Piguet. 2016. MOOLs for MOOCs: A first edX scalable implementation. In Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), 2016 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 246--251.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Christophe Salzmann, Wissam Halimi, Denis Gillet, and Sten Govaerts. 2017. Deploying Large Scale Online Labs with Smart Devices. Cyber-Physical Laboratories in Engineering and Science Education (In Press) (2017).

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Romero Alonso RManzo Olivares PSepúlveda Cerón PMuñoz Rozas M(2022)Experiencias en formación virtual de ingeniería: una reseña bibliográfica sistematizadaRevista Educación en Ingeniería10.26507/rei.v17n34.123217:34(1-11)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v17n34.1232
Labrie AMok TTang ALui MOehlberg LPoretski L(2022)Toward Video-Conferencing Tools for Hands-On Activities in Online TeachingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34928296:GROUP(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3492829

Index Terms

Access to Massive Open Online Labs through a MOOC
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Web-based interaction

Recommendations

Supporting learners' self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses
Abstract
In MOOCs, learners are typically presented with great autonomy over their learning process. Therefore, learners should engage in self-regulated learning (SRL) in order to successfully study in a MOOC. Learners however often struggle to self-...
Highlights
- Learners struggle to regulate their learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs).
- A self-regulated learning (SRL) intervention was implemented in three MOOCs.
- Learners' SRL was measured with trace data variables.
- ...
Perception of MOOC Pedagogical Tools and Learners' Learning Styles in MOOC Blended Teaching: a Case Study
ICEBT '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-Technology

Rapid development has been achieved since the emergence of MOOC in 2008, but there are still many defects in the popularization of MOOC. Developing blended teaching by utilizing is considered to be one of effective means to overcome these shortcomings. ...
Understanding the Effect of In-Video Prompting on Learners and Instructors
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Online instructional videos are ubiquitous, but it is difficult for instructors to gauge learners' experience and their level of comprehension or confusion regarding the lecture video. Moreover, learners watching the videos may become disengaged or fail ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

L@S '17: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale

April 2017

352 pages

ISBN:9781450344500

DOI:10.1145/3051457

General Chair:
Claudia Urrea
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Justin Reich
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
,
Candace Thille
Stanford University, USA

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 April 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Short-paper

Conference

L@S 2017

Sponsor:

L@S 2017: Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale

April 20 - 21, 2017

Massachusetts, Cambridge, USA

Acceptance Rates

L@S '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 105 submissions, 13%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
203
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Romero Alonso RManzo Olivares PSepúlveda Cerón PMuñoz Rozas M(2022)Experiencias en formación virtual de ingeniería: una reseña bibliográfica sistematizadaRevista Educación en Ingeniería10.26507/rei.v17n34.123217:34(1-11)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2022
https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v17n34.1232
Labrie AMok TTang ALui MOehlberg LPoretski L(2022)Toward Video-Conferencing Tools for Hands-On Activities in Online TeachingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34928296:GROUP(1-22)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3492829

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Supporting learners' self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses

Perception of MOOC Pedagogical Tools and Learners' Learning Styles in MOOC Blended Teaching: a Case Study

Understanding the Effect of In-Video Prompting on Learners and Instructors