Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2934872.2959083acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Free access

Towards Transiently Secure Updates in Asynchronous SDNs

Published: 22 August 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Software-Defined Networks (SDNs) promise to overcome the often complex and error-prone operation of tradi- tional computer networks, by enabling programmabil- ity, automation and verifiability. Yet, SDNs also in- troduce new challenges, for example due to the asyn- chronous communication channel between the logically centralized control platform and the switches in the data plane. In particular, the asynchronous commu- nication of network update commands (e.g., OpenFlow FlowMod messages) may lead to transient inconsisten- cies, such as loops or bypassed waypoints (e.g., fire- walls). One approach to ensure transient consistency even in asynchronous environments is to employ smart scheduling algorithms: algorithms which update subsets of switches in each communication round only, where each subset in itself guarantees consistency. In this demo, we show how to change routing policies in a transiently consistent manner. We demonstrate two al- gorithms, namely, Wayup [5] and Peacock [4], which partition the network updates sent from SDN controller towards OpenFlow software switches into multiple rounds as per respective algorithms. Later, the barrier mes- sages are utilized to ensure reliable network updates.

References

[1]
S. Dudycz, A. Ludwig, and S. Schmid. Can$'$t touch this: Consistent network updates for multiple policies. In IEEE/IFIP DSN, 2016.
[2]
M. Kuzniar, P. Peresini, and D. Kostic. What you need to know about sdn flow tables. In PAM, 2015.
[3]
A. Ludwig, S. Dudycz, M. Rost, and S. Schmid. Transiently secure network updates. In ACM SIGMETRICS, 2016.
[4]
A. Ludwig, J. Marcinkowski, and S. Schmid. Scheduling loop-free network updates: It$'$s good to relax! In ACM PODC, 2015.
[5]
A. Ludwig, M. Rost, D. Foucard, and S. Schmid. Good network updates for bad packets. In ACM HotNets, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Measuring the Consistency Between Data and Control Plane in SDNIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2022.319369831:2(511-525)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2021)No-hopProceedings of the Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems10.1145/3493425.3502757(80-87)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2021
  • (2018)Measuring the Control-Data Plane Consistency in Software Defined Networking2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)10.1109/ICC.2018.8422613(1-7)Online publication date: May-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Towards Transiently Secure Updates in Asynchronous SDNs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCOMM '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference
      August 2016
      645 pages
      ISBN:9781450341936
      DOI:10.1145/2934872
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 August 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Mininet
      2. SDN

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      SIGCOMM '16
      Sponsor:
      SIGCOMM '16: ACM SIGCOMM 2016 Conference
      August 22 - 26, 2016
      Florianopolis, Brazil

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCOMM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 231 submissions, 17%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 462 of 3,389 submissions, 14%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Measuring the Consistency Between Data and Control Plane in SDNIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2022.319369831:2(511-525)Online publication date: Apr-2023
      • (2021)No-hopProceedings of the Symposium on Architectures for Networking and Communications Systems10.1145/3493425.3502757(80-87)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2021
      • (2018)Measuring the Control-Data Plane Consistency in Software Defined Networking2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)10.1109/ICC.2018.8422613(1-7)Online publication date: May-2018
      • (2017)Proactive-routing path update in Software Defined Networks(SDN)2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control (I2C2)10.1109/I2C2.2017.8321969(1-3)Online publication date: Jun-2017
      • (undefined)Navigating the Landscape of Programmable Networks: Looking beyond the Regulatory Status QuoSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.3427455

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media