Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2914920.2915014acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesperdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic projection positioning based on surface suitability

Published: 20 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Projectors most likely will be embedded into the next generation of mobile devices, and thus projecting pictures and videos into the physical world will be an important use case. However, the projection positioning in the real world is challenged by surface reflections or objects in the environment. As adjusting the projected image manually is cumbersome, in this work, we introduce a camera-based algorithm to measure the projection suitability of arbitrary surfaces by using three classifiers that can be derived automatically and in real-time from a camera image. Through a user study, in that participants rated the projection quality of different surfaces, we developed guidelines to indicate suitable projection spots using the three classifiers. As a proof of concept, we implemented a mobile prototype applying the proposed guidelines. This prototype automatically scales and places projected content at the position in everyday environments that promises the best projection quality.

References

[1]
Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. 2006. Surf: Speeded up robust features. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2006. Springer, 404--417.
[2]
Paul Beardsley, Jeroen Van Baar, Ramesh Raskar, and Clifton Forlines. 2005. Interaction using a handheld projector. Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 1 (2005), 39--43.
[3]
Oliver Bimber, Daisuke Iwai, Gordon Wetzstein, and Anselm Grundhöfer. 2008. The visual computing of projector-camera systems. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 classes. ACM, 84.
[4]
Sebastian Büttner, Oliver Sand, and Carsten Röcker. 2015. Extending the Design Space in Industrial Manufacturing Through Mobile Projection. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. ACM, 1130--1133.
[5]
Andreas Butz, Michael Schneider, and Mira Spassova. 2004. Searchlight--a lightweight search function for pervasive environments. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 351--356.
[6]
John Canny. 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. PAMI 6 (1986), 679--698.
[7]
Markus Funk, Sven Mayer, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015a. Using In-Situ Projection to Support Cognitively Impaired Workers at the Workplace. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. ACM, 185--192.
[8]
Markus Funk, Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Sven Mayer, Lars Lischke, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015b. Pick from here!: an interactive mobile cart using in-situ projection for order picking. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 601--609.
[9]
Jan Gugenheimer, Pascal Knierim, Julian Seifert, and Enrico Rukzio. 2014. Ubibeam: An interactive projector-camera system for domestic deployment. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, 305--310.
[10]
Chris Harrison, Hrvoje Benko, and Andrew D Wilson. 2011. OmniTouch: wearable multitouch interaction everywhere. In Proc UIST'11. ACM, 441--450.
[11]
Brett Jones, Rajinder Sodhi, Michael Murdock, Ravish Mehra, Hrvoje Benko, Andrew Wilson, Eyal Ofek, Blair MacIntyre, Nikunj Raghuvanshi, and Lior Shapira. 2014. Roomalive: Magical experiences enabled by scalable, adaptive projector-camera units. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 637--644.
[12]
Brett R Jones, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D Wilson. 2013. IllumiRoom: peripheral projected illusions for interactive experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 869--878.
[13]
Markus Löchtefeld, Sven Gehring, Johannes Schöning, and Antonio Krüger. 2010. Shelftorchlight: Augmenting a shelf using a camera projector unit. In Conference on Pervasive Computing, Vol. 10. Citeseer.
[14]
Claudio Pinhanez. 2001. The everywhere displays projector: A device to create ubiquitous graphical interfaces. In Ubicomp'2001. Springer, 315--331.
[15]
Enrico Rukzio, Paul Holleis, and Hans Gellersen. 2012. Personal projectors for pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 11, 2 (2012), 30--37.
[16]
Johannes Schöning, Markus Löchtefeld, Michael Rohs, and Antonio Krüger. 2010. Projector Phones: a new class of interfaces for augmented reality. IJMHCI 2, 3 (2010), 1--14.
[17]
Andrew D Wilson. 2004. TouchLight: an imaging touch screen and display for gesture-based interaction. In Proc. ICMI'04. ACM, 69--76.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Legibility Estimation for Projected AR Contents2020 IEEE 9th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE50665.2020.9291705(615-616)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2020
  • (2018)Enhancing User Experiences of Mobile-Based Augmented Reality via Spatial Augmented RealityAdvances in Multimedia10.1155/2018/81947262018Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018

Index Terms

  1. Automatic projection positioning based on surface suitability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PerDis '16: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays
    June 2016
    266 pages
    ISBN:9781450343664
    DOI:10.1145/2914920
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adaptive ui
    2. camera-projector system
    3. projector phones

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    PerDis '16

    Acceptance Rates

    PerDis '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 47 submissions, 60%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 213 of 384 submissions, 55%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Legibility Estimation for Projected AR Contents2020 IEEE 9th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE50665.2020.9291705(615-616)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2020
    • (2018)Enhancing User Experiences of Mobile-Based Augmented Reality via Spatial Augmented RealityAdvances in Multimedia10.1155/2018/81947262018Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media