Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2908812.2908881acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Noisy Optimization: Fast Convergence Rates with Comparison-Based Algorithms

Published: 20 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Derivative Free Optimization is known to be an efficient and robust method to tackle the black-box optimization problem. When it comes to noisy functions, classical comparison-based algorithms are slower than gradient-based algorithms. For quadratic functions, Evolutionary Algorithms without large mutations have a simple regret at best O(1/√N) when N is the number of function evaluations, whereas stochastic gradient descent can reach (tightly) a simple regret in O(1/N). It has been conjectured that gradient approximation by finite differences (hence, not a comparison-based method) is necessary for reaching such a O(1/N). We answer this conjecture in the negative, providing a comparison-based algorithm as good as gradient methods, i.e. reaching O(1/N) - under the condition, however, that the noise is Gaussian. Experimental results confirm the O(1/N) simple regret, i.e., squared rate compared to many published results at O(1/√N).

References

[1]
S. Astete-Morales, M.-L. Cauwet, and O. Teytaud. Evolution Strategies with Additive Noise: A Convergence Rate Lower Bound. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, page 9, Aberythswyth, United Kingdom, 2015.
[2]
H.-G. Beyer. Mutate Large, But Inherit Small! On the Analysis of Rescaled Mutations in (I, λ)-ES with Noisy Fitness Data. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 5, Heidelberg, 1998. Springer. in print.
[3]
H. F. Chen, T. E. Duncan, and B. Pasik-Duncan. A stochastic approximation algorithm with random differences. In Proceedings of the 13th IFAC World Congress, volume H, pages 493--496, 1996.
[4]
J. Decock and O. Teytaud. Noisy optimization complexity under locality assumption. In Proceedings of the twelfth workshop on Foundations of genetic algorithms XII, FOGA XII '13, pages 183--190, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[5]
V. Dupač. Notes on stochastic approximation methods. Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 08(1):139--149, 1958.
[6]
V. Fabian. Stochastic Approximation of Minima with Improved Asymptotic Speed. Annals of Mathematical statistics, 38:191--200, 1967.
[7]
K. G. Jamieson, R. Nowak, and B. Recht. Query complexity of derivative-free optimization. In F. Pereira, C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, pages 2672--2680. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012.
[8]
J. Kiefer, J. Wolfowitz, et al. Stochastic estimation of the maximum of a regression function. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3):462--466, 1952.
[9]
P. Rolet and O. Teytaud. Adaptive noisy optimization. In C. Di Chio, S. Cagnoni, C. Cotta, M. Ebner, A. EkÄąrt, A. Esparcia-Alcazar, C.-K. Goh, J. Merelo, F. Neri, M. PreuAY, J. Togelius, and G. Yannakakis, editors, Applications of Evolutionary Computation, volume 6024 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 592--601. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
[10]
O. Shamir. On the complexity of bandit and derivative-free stochastic convex optimization. In COLT 2013 - The 26th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, June 12-14, 2013, Princeton University, NJ, USA, pages 3--24, 2013.
[11]
M. Zedek. Continuity and location of zeroes of linear combinations of polynomials. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 16:78--84, 1965.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Consistent population controlProceedings of the 15th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms10.1145/3299904.3340312(116-123)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2019

Index Terms

  1. Noisy Optimization: Fast Convergence Rates with Comparison-Based Algorithms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '16: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016
    July 2016
    1196 pages
    ISBN:9781450342063
    DOI:10.1145/2908812
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 July 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. comparison-based algorithms
    2. noisy continuous optimization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    GECCO '16
    Sponsor:
    GECCO '16: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 20 - 24, 2016
    Colorado, Denver, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    GECCO '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 137 of 381 submissions, 36%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)Consistent population controlProceedings of the 15th ACM/SIGEVO Conference on Foundations of Genetic Algorithms10.1145/3299904.3340312(116-123)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2019

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media