research-article

Live Participation: Augmenting Events with Audience-Performer Interaction Systems

Authors:

Matti Nelimarkka,

Kai Kuikkaniemi,

Antti Salovaara,

Giulio JacucciAuthors Info & Claims

DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

Pages 509 - 520

https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901862

Published: 04 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Tools for supporting performer-audience interaction have been gaining increasing interest in HCI community recently. They encompass a wide range of systems from simple polls to live tweeting and backchannel chats. However, a lack of unifying conceptual framework hampers their efficient development and deployment in events. In this paper, we develop a notion of live participation and present a live participation system that aims to capture performer-audience interaction systems' salient design-relevant characteristics. With user studies, we identify central characteristics of live participation (RQ1) and explore the diversity of types of live participation situations (RQ2). The identified concepts-extended performance, integration work, and episodes-provide the groundwork for further design of live participation systems and more engaging audience interactions.

References

[1]

Salvatore Andolina, Khalil Klouche, Diogo Cabral, Tuukka Ruotsalo, and Giulio Jacucci. 2015. InspirationWall: Supporting Idea Generation Through Automatic Information Exploration. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM Press, 103--106.

Digital Library

[2]

Philip Auslander. 2012. Digital Liveness: a Historico-Philosophical Perspective. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art 34, 3 (2012), 3--11.

[3]

Ian D. Beatty, William J. Gerace, and Robert J. Dufresne. 2006. Designing Effective Questions for Classroom Response System Teaching. American Journal of Physics 74, 1 (2006), 31--39.

[4]

Tony Bergstrom, Andrew Harris, and Karrie Karahalios. 2011. Encouraging Initiative in the Classroom with Anonymous Feedback. In Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 627--642. //dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23774-4{_}49

Digital Library

[5]

Lorena Blasco-Arcas, Isabel Buil, Blanca Hernández-Ortega, and F. Javier Sese. 2013. Using Clickers in Class. The Role of Interactivity, Active Collaborative Learning and Engagement in Learning Performance. Computers and Education 62 (2013), 102--110.

[6]

danah m. boyd. 2009. Spectacle at Web2.0 Expo... from my perspective. Available online at http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2009/11/24/spectacle_at_we.html. (2009).

[7]

Jane E. Caldwell. 2007. Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips. CBE Life Sciences Education 6, 1 (2007), 9--20.

[8]

Alan Dix, Jennifer G. Sheridan, Stuart Reeves, and Steve Benford. 2006. Formalising Performative Interaction. In Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification. 15--25.

Digital Library

[9]

Marian Dörk, Daniel Gruen, Carey Williamson, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2010. A Visual Backchannel for Large-Scale Events. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (2010), 1129--1138.

Digital Library

[10]

Honglu Du, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2012. Communication Patterns for a Classroom Public Digital Backchannel. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM international Conference on Design of Communication. ACM Press, 127.

Digital Library

[11]

Honglu Du, Mary Beth Rosson, John M. Carroll, and Craig Ganoe. 2009. I felt like a contributing member of the class. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM Press, 233.

Digital Library

[12]

Carmen Fies and Jill Marshall. 2006. Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15, 1 (2006), 101--109.

[13]

Donald Getz. 1991. Festivals, special events, and tourism. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

[14]

Donald Getz. 2012. Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events. Routledge.

[15]

Joe J. Goldblatt. 1990. Special Events: The Art and Science of Celebration. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

[16]

Colin M. Hall. 1992. Hallmark Tourist Events: Impacts, Management and Planning. Belhaven Press.

[17]

Drew Harry, Eric Gordon, and Chris Schmandt. 2012. Setting the Stage for Interaction: A Tablet Application to Augment. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, 1071--1081.

Digital Library

[18]

Drew Harry, Joshua Green, and Judith Donath. 2009. backchan.nl. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, 1361--1370.

Digital Library

[19]

Giulio Jacucci. 2015. Interaction as Performance: Performative Strategies in Designing Interactive Experiences. In Ubiquitous Computing, Complexity, and Culture, Ulrik Ekman, Jay David Bolter, Lily Diaz, Morten Sondergaard, and Maria Engberg (Eds.). Routledge, New York.

[20]

Brigitte Jordan and Austin Henderson. 1995. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1 1995), 39--103.

[21]

Eugene Judson and Daiyo Sawada. 2002. Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21, 2 (2002), 167--181.

[22]

Robin H. Kay and Ann LeSage. 2009. Examining the Benefits and Challenges of Using Audience Response Systems: A Review of the Literature. Computers & Education 53, 3 (2009), 819--827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001

Digital Library

[23]

Christopher Kelty, Aaron Panofsky, Morgan Currie, Roderic Crooks, Seth Erickson, Patricia Garcia, Michael Wartenbe, and Stacy Wood. 2015. Seven Dimensions of Contemporary Participation Disentangled. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 3 (2015), 474--488.

Digital Library

[24]

David M. Lane and Rober S. Atlas. 1996. The Networked Classroom. In The meeting of Computers and Psychology. http://ctl.sri.com/publications/ displayPublication.jsp?ID=321

[25]

Anders Olof Larsson. 2013. Tweeting the Viewer -- Use of Twitter in a Talk Show Context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57, 2 (4 2013), 135--152.

[26]

Eun-Ju Lee. 2012. That's Not the Way It Is: How User-Generated Comments on the News Affect Perceived Media Bias. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18, 1 (10 2012), 32--45. //dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x

Digital Library

[27]

Misa T. Maruyama, Scott P. Robertson, Sara K. Douglas, Bryan C. Semaan, and Heather A. Faucett. 2014. Hybrid Media Consumption. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM Press, 1422--1432.

Digital Library

[28]

Joseph F. McCarthy and danah m. boyd. 2005. Digital Backchannels in Shared Physical Spaces. In 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 1641.

Digital Library

[29]

Kimra McPherson, Kai Huotari, Yo-Shang F. Cheng, David Humphrey, Coye Chesire, and Andrew L. Brooks. 2012. Glitter: a Mixed-Methods Study of Twitter Use During Glee Broadcasts. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion. 167--170. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2141569

Digital Library

[30]

Matti Nelimarkka, Kai Kuikkaniemi, and Giulio Jacucci. 2014. A Field Trial of an Anonymous Backchannel Among Primary School Pupils. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM Press, 238--242.

Digital Library

[31]

Jay F. Nunamaker, Robert O. Briggs, Daniel D. Mittleman, Douglas R. Vogel, and Balthazard A. Pierre. 1996. Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings. Journal of Management Information Systems 13, 3 (12 1996), 163--207. //dx.doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518138

Digital Library

[32]

Stuart Reeves. 2011. Designing Interfaces in Public Settings: Understanding the Role of the Spectator in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer.

Digital Library

[33]

Stuart Reeves, Steve Benford, Claire O'Malley, and Mike Fraser. 2005. Designing the spectator experience. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 741.

Digital Library

[34]

Jun Rekimoto, Yuji Ayatsuka, Hitoraka Uoi, and Toshifumi Arai. 1998. Adding Another Communication Channel to Reality. In Conference summary on Human factors in Computing Systems 1998. ACM Press, 271--272.

Digital Library

[35]

Richard Schechner. 2013. Performance studies: An introduction. Routledge.

[36]

Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1, 1--2 (1992), 7--40.

[37]

Jennifer G. Sheridan, Alan Dix, Simon Lock, and Alice Bayliss. 2005. Understanding Interaction in Ubiquitous Guerrilla Performances in Playful Arenas. In Proceedings of HCI 2004: People and Computers XVIII -- Design for Life. 3--17.

[38]

David Silverman. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research. A practical handbook. SAGE Publications.

[39]

Jocelyn Spence, Stuart Andrews, and David M. Frohlich. 2012. Now, Where Was I? Negotiating Time in Digitally Augmented Autobiographical Performance. Journal of Media Practice 13, 3 (9 2012), 269--284.

[40]

Jocelyn Spence, David Frohlich, and Stuart Andrews. 2013. Performative Experience Design: Where Autobiographical Performance and HumanComputer Interaction Meet. Digital Creativity 24, 2 (2013), 96--110.

[41]

Erik Stolterman and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. Concept-Driven Interaction Design Research. Human-Computer Interaction 25, 2 (2010), 95--118.

[42]

Anselm Strauss. 1985. Work and the Division of Labor. The Sociological Quarterly 26, 1 (1985), 1--19.

[43]

Anselm Leonard Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Vol. 15. Sage Newbury Park, CA.

[44]

Julie R. Williamson, Lone Koefoed Hansen, Giulio Jacucci, Ann Light, and Stuart Reeves. 2014. Understanding Performative Interactions in Public Settings. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 7 (2014), 1545--1549.

Digital Library

[45]

Sarita Yardi. 2006. The Role of the Backchannel in Collaborative Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences. 852--858. http: //dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1150034.1150158

Digital Library

Cited By

Greenhalgh CHazzard ABenford SCliffe LKelly E(2022)Crafting Trajectories of Smart Phone Use at the OperaACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/353100729:6(1-37)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3531007
Salovaara ANelimarkka MKuikkaniemi KJacucci G(2021)Augmenting the Performer–Audience Live Participation in Professional Event ProductionsProceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3464327.3464328(186-196)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3464327.3464328
Nelimarkka MSalovaara AJacucci G(2021)Exploring Norm Violations and Norm Management in Collocated Synchronous Communication: Dual-channel Communication as Hybrid Space with Spillover and AsymmetriesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34639335:GROUP(1-24)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3463933
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Live Participation: Augmenting Events with Audience-Performer Interaction Systems
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing

Recommendations

Augmenting the Performer–Audience Live Participation in Professional Event Productions
Academic Mindtrek '21: Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference

Event productions, such as corporate workshops, night galas, or networking events, can reach higher levels of participant experience and productiveness if performer–audience interactions are augmented with possibilities for live participation from ...
What Makes Live Events Engaging on Facebook Live, Periscope, and Snapchat
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Live streaming platforms bring events from all around the world to people's computing devices. We conducted a mixed methods study including interviews (N = 42) and a survey (N = 223) to understand how people currently experience events using Facebook ...
Proxemic Mobile Collocated Interactions
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Recent research on mobile collocated interactions has been looking at situations in which collocated users engage in collaborative activities using their mobile devices. However, existing practices fail to fully account for the culturally-dependent ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

June 2016

1374 pages

ISBN:9781450340311

DOI:10.1145/2901790

General Chair:
Marcus Foth
Queensland University of Technology
,
Program Chairs:
Wendy Ju
Stanford University
,
Ronald Schroeter
Queensland University of Technology
,
Stephen Viller
University of Queensland

Copyright © 2016 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 June 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Tekes

Conference

DIS '16

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

DIS '16: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2016

June 4 - 8, 2016

QLD, Brisbane, Australia

Acceptance Rates

DIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 418 submissions, 26%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
371
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)54
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 17 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Greenhalgh CHazzard ABenford SCliffe LKelly E(2022)Crafting Trajectories of Smart Phone Use at the OperaACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/353100729:6(1-37)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3531007
Salovaara ANelimarkka MKuikkaniemi KJacucci G(2021)Augmenting the Performer–Audience Live Participation in Professional Event ProductionsProceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3464327.3464328(186-196)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3464327.3464328
Nelimarkka MSalovaara AJacucci G(2021)Exploring Norm Violations and Norm Management in Collocated Synchronous Communication: Dual-channel Communication as Hybrid Space with Spillover and AsymmetriesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34639335:GROUP(1-24)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3463933
Gomes Gde Freitas RCastro TGadelha BSantos CBento Villela MGasparini IUchôa Conte T(2020)InteraHeuProceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3424953.3426541(1-6)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3424953.3426541
Martins GGomes GConceição JMarques LSilva DCastro TGadelha Bde Freitas RSantos CBento Villela MGasparini IUchôa Conte T(2020)Enhanced interactionProceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3424953.3426492(1-9)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3424953.3426492
Lehtiniemi THaapoja J(2019)Data agency at stake: MyData activism and alternative frames of equal participationNew Media & Society10.1177/146144481986195522:1(87-104)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819861955
Lee SWillette AKoutra DLasecki WDow SMaher MKerne ALatulipe C(2019)The Effect of Social Interaction on Facilitating Audience Participation in a Live Music PerformanceProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3325480.3325509(108-120)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3325480.3325509
Nelimarkka MJacucci GSalovaara ADow SO'Hara KBarkhuus LFischer JEvers VNaaman MFitzpatrick GKarahalios KLampinen AMonroy-Hernández A(2018)Hybrid EventsCompanion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3272973.3273011(455-462)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3272973.3273011
Nelimarkka MSalovaara ASemaan BJacucci GMark GFussell SLampe Cschraefel mHourcade JAppert CWigdor D(2017)Theory-Driven Collocated CMCProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025885(4534-4547)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3025453.3025885

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents